You know you are in trouble when all you have are cute responses.
It's okay man, it's Internet Hindu nature to talk big but run when confronted.
So do India declare you Sikh? Actually , "Brainwashed" That same term they use for indian sikhs, during partition even muslim indian nationalists haven't supported us. but still we get it wat we wanted, Similarly those who have any sane vision for Sikhism will absolutly wants it to seperated and independent. you can't deny it cuz many of your sikh fellas having same vision, muslims indian nationalists were against us at then and are against us today. even our army before partition was a part of indian army, can you deny that fact, wats matters is ideology and vision whether you support them or not.even their strategic location suports them as well?
i again say that how common indian is responsible for dat...shoud i hate my frnds who hv nothing to do with 84? or common ppl...
...Abhi bhi 100000000000 of things we have to do...may be more..
No considering then India occupied Hyderabad illegally , the money should be transferred to their legal heirs .
Means that Interms of Hyderabad , it is also occupied forcefully by india, and their locals those wants independent status should have given a chance to chose watever they want?Well the difference is the duffers failed in Kashmir (and are complaining till now) while we won decisively in Hyderabad.
fcuk ...we never wanted to go with Pakistan . We wanted to remain as independent state . Werent you guys sat like cowards and watched when India attacked us ?
Well the difference is the duffers failed in Kashmir (and are complaining till now) while we won decisively in Hyderabad.
Thank you for making my point.
Indians like to say that Kashmir is theirs because the Hindu ruler gave it to them, but then they say that even tho the Nazim went with Pakistan, they had a right to invade it.
This is the hypocricy that is in the very blood of Indians.
Pakistanis on the other hand have a faith that tells us not to be hypocritical. So we don't make a fuss about Hyderabad because we know that it was a majority Hindu area and Pakistan was meant for Muslims. We do however make a fuss about Kashmir for that same reason.
Now lets look at the reality on the ground. India took Kashmir because they say that the Hindu leader gave it to them but then they Invaded Hyderabad even though it wanted to be with Pakistan.
Pakistan made no claim to Hyderabad because we knew the people did not want to part of Pakistan, but we did make a claim to Kashmir because those people did want to be part of Pakistan.
One of the two countries I describe has been hypocritical and inconsistent, I'll let you geniuses figure out which one.
Also, the Hindu leader of Kashmir was under compulsion. The Indians forced him to sign over Kashmir for their "aid"
Where as the Nazim signed over to Pakistan willingly with no compulsion.
I think it's cute that you think you can try and copy my post. But as we can see you just could not replicate an original. For that you need truth and talent on your side
