Han Patriot
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2011
- Messages
- 13,535
- Reaction score
- -36
- Country
- Location
You need F-16 as a form of tribute to US. To be under the Empire's security umbrella, you need to pay protection fee.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is not a flame thread. There are valid doubts about technological capabilities of Indian organizations. Let there be debate.
We have a right to know because these organizations are using the name of our country on international platform and they are playing with our emotions by creating a sense of pride - real or false.
So why do we need F-16 planes when we have Tejas LCA?
I can think of TWO explanations.
Explanation 1:
It is reminiscent of past. You notice the pattern?
Faking a technological capability so that USA doesn't deny the genuine technology because we have pretended that we have that technology anyways. Indians did that with the computer technology. Faked building of supercomputer PARAM which paved way to Americans allowing the export of personal computers to India.
Abdul Kalam had said, "West offers technology only if the recipient country is on the verge of perfecting that technology." It should be added that there's no need to perfect the technology. Feigning the technological capability by bribing Western media houses would suffice.
Explanation 2:
Industrial espionage: Producing F-16s on Indian soil will facilitate the copying of Western technology. HAL and DRDO engineers disguised as workers and staff of TATA will take employment in the manufacturing units of Lockheed Martin located in India. These HAL and DRDO spies will make covert observations of production of F-16 planes. When they go home after working hours are over, they will document all the technology and production techniques learnt by spying in Lockheed Martin-TATA factories. Is this practice called as industrial espionage? Technology transfer in a cost effective but hook or crook way.
But it's all and in India except the engine, the radar, the weapons, the avionics, the airframe design and the tyres.LCA neither has the range or the payload or the proven capability along with weapon diversity.
But it's all and in India except the engine, the radar, the weapons, the avionics, the airframe design and the tyres.
You see you have answered sensibly and I can understand a country wanting to invest in its own industry. Pakistan has invested in jf17. We produce more than 50percent of the components but it's not our baby entirely and we don't claim that either. In India chest thumping has become a sport much like cricket but all empty claims. Glad people like you with reasoning existSo? We need a weapon that can go to war and achieve operational objectives, not just because we made it. The operational situation right now needs a medium weight category aircraft with range and payload for deep strike missions like SEAD and deploying PGM. LCA does not have the capability yet and wont have it till MK2 which I am strongly against. We need to invest more in medium weight category aircraft.
whats your contribution for jf17 ,kindly back yourself with the sourceYou see you have answered sensibly and I can understand a country wanting to invest in its own industry. Pakistan has invested in jf17. We produce more than 50percent of the components but it's not our baby entirely and we don't claim that either. In India chest thumping has become a sport much like cricket but all empty claims. Glad people like you with reasoning exist
just incase the teja lca has a diarrhoea.
View: Navy's rejection of Tejas is a lesson, failure of DRDO
Read more at:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
By Admiral Arun Prakash (retd.)
The peremptory rejection of the shipborne variant of the Tejas light combat aircraft (LCA) by the Indian Navy seems to have surprised most navy-watching analysts. Their confusion has been compounded by the near-simultaneous issuance of a global request for information (RFI) for procurement of "57 multirole fighters for its aircraft carriers" by Naval HQ.
One can deduce two compelling reasons for this, seemingly, radical v ..
Read more at:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
sorry does not allow me to copy and paste all of the info here you must click link.
ARE YOU SERIOUS FALSE FLAGGER!!!This is not a flame thread. There are valid doubts about technological capabilities of Indian organizations. Let there be debate.
We have a right to know because these organizations are using the name of our country on international platform and they are playing with our emotions by creating a sense of pride - real or false.
So why do we need F-16 planes when we have Tejas LCA?
I can think of TWO explanations.
Explanation 1:
It is reminiscent of past. You notice the pattern?
Faking a technological capability so that USA doesn't deny the genuine technology because we have pretended that we have that technology anyways. Indians did that with the computer technology. Faked building of supercomputer PARAM which paved way to Americans allowing the export of personal computers to India.
Abdul Kalam had said, "West offers technology only if the recipient country is on the verge of perfecting that technology." It should be added that there's no need to perfect the technology. Feigning the technological capability by bribing Western media houses would suffice.
You need F-16 as a form of tribute to US. To be under the Empire's security umbrella, you need to pay protection fee.
This is not a flame thread. There are valid doubts about technological capabilities of Indian organizations. Let there be debate.
We have a right to know because these organizations are using the name of our country on international platform and they are playing with our emotions by creating a sense of pride - real or false.
So why do we need F-16 planes when we have Tejas LCA?
I can think of TWO explanations.
Explanation 1:
It is reminiscent of past. You notice the pattern?
Faking a technological capability so that USA doesn't deny the genuine technology because we have pretended that we have that technology anyways. Indians did that with the computer technology. Faked building of supercomputer PARAM which paved way to Americans allowing the export of personal computers to India.
Abdul Kalam had said, "West offers technology only if the recipient country is on the verge of perfecting that technology." It should be added that there's no need to perfect the technology. Feigning the technological capability by bribing Western media houses would suffice.
Explanation 2:
Industrial espionage: Producing F-16s on Indian soil will facilitate the copying of Western technology. HAL and DRDO engineers disguised as workers and staff of TATA will take employment in the manufacturing units of Lockheed Martin located in India. These HAL and DRDO spies will make covert observations of production of F-16 planes. When they go home after working hours are over, they will document all the technology and production techniques learnt by spying in Lockheed Martin-TATA factories. Is this practice called as industrial espionage? Technology transfer in a cost effective but hook or crook way.
Faked building of supercomputer PARAM which paved way to Americans allowing the export of personal computers to India.
Explanation 2
Industrial espionage: Producing F-16s on Indian soil will facilitate the copying of Western technology. HAL and DRDO engineers disguised as workers and staff of TATA will take employment in the manufacturing units of Lockheed Martin located in India. These HAL and DRDO spies will make covert observations of production of F-16 planes. When they go home after working hours are over, they will document all the technology and production techniques learnt by spying in Lockheed Martin-TATA factories. Is this practice called as industrial espionage? Technology transfer in a cost effective but hook or crook way.
Can you afford F35? If you can afford and they are offering it, seriously why not F-35?
(why not F-35 then?)
Perhaps because F16 is bigger/heavier aircraft, that is capable of carrying twice the Tejas' ordnance load, over twice the Tejas' range?
Can you afford F35? If you can afford and they are offering it, seriously why not F-35?
Bro,ur country pakistan cant afford F35 false flagger
@SOUTHieThis is not a flame thread. There are valid doubts about technological capabilities of Indian organizations. Let there be debate.
We have a right to know because these organizations are using the name of our country on international platform and they are playing with our emotions by creating a sense of pride - real or false.
So why do we need F-16 planes when we have Tejas LCA?
I can think of TWO explanations.
Explanation 1:
It is reminiscent of past. You notice the pattern?
Faking a technological capability so that USA doesn't deny the genuine technology because we have pretended that we have that technology anyways. Indians did that with the computer technology. Faked building of supercomputer PARAM which paved way to Americans allowing the export of personal computers to India.
Abdul Kalam had said, "West offers technology only if the recipient country is on the verge of perfecting that technology." It should be added that there's no need to perfect the technology. Feigning the technological capability by bribing Western media houses would suffice.
Explanation 2:
Industrial espionage: Producing F-16s on Indian soil will facilitate the copying of Western technology. HAL and DRDO engineers disguised as workers and staff of TATA will take employment in the manufacturing units of Lockheed Martin located in India. These HAL and DRDO spies will make covert observations of production of F-16 planes. When they go home after working hours are over, they will document all the technology and production techniques learnt by spying in Lockheed Martin-TATA factories. Is this practice called as industrial espionage? Technology transfer in a cost effective but hook or crook way.