What's new

Why was Turkey the first Islamic country to recognize the state of Israel?

from his human side he was not even a dog.. he was insane and filthy dont make such leaders holy men they are dictators and enemies of islam



Can any leader today drive in the streets without heavy security guards ?
which leader provides their citizens with everything they needs such as healthcare free, food stock paid for, cars half paid, education free, apartments, money for having babies, manmade river project to make the desert bloom.
He got murdered for throwing out imf/Rothschild central bank= gold dinar for oil and for creation of united states of Africa. He biggest mistake was not having a heavy military deterrence.
 
.
Why? Is it difficult to learn? Can you post pictures of how it looks?

Integration a new whole writing system on everything at least takes a couple of decades. You need to make it step by step. The economic burden would be unnecassarily heavy. Adaptation process would be painful. On the other hand you need to update whole computer related systems. It would be good but we have no such luxury at the moment.
 
.
Greek script from King Antialcidas of Taxila - a ancient capital of various Gandhara kingdoms - Taxila today is on the suburb of Pakistan's capital Islamabad.

349px-Coin_of_Antialcidas.jpg



MIG0356-CNG82.791.jpg



http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/139


55397912633e5.jpg
 
.
You are proud of Arabic script as a Pakistani ??? Are you an Arab or Pakistani ?
Nice try though.

Our Urdu script worlks well with the Arabic/Persian script.

Are you European or Turkish, because you use the Latin Alphabet which even Japan doesn't use.

Don't be a hypocrite.

Grow up!

Yes we are happy with Ataturk, we love him. Adoption of Arabic, Persian, Latin, Cyrillic script is nothing new among Turks. I'd prefer old Turkic script but that is near impossible to implement so the easiest thing Latin will do.

Funny Pakistanis promote Arabic script but you don't understand three lines of the Quran. As if script is something holy lol

If you love Arabic so much go learn it and keep it to yourself.
Yes we are happy with Ataturk, we love him. Adoption of Arabic, Persian, Latin, Cyrillic script is nothing new among Turks. I'd prefer old Turkic script but that is near impossible to implement so the easiest thing Latin will do.

Funny Pakistanis promote Arabic script but you don't understand three lines of the Quran. As if script is something holy lol

If you love Arabic so much go learn it and keep it to yourself.

I am talking about the script, not the language of Arabic.

lol. You Turks use the Latin script. Are you French or Turkish.

Again grow up.

What is wrong with using the Persian script when our language works well with it.

Again don't be an idiot and argue with facts.
 
. .
The legacy of the credo of defeat and humiliation still plays out even while being in Canada. The contradictions are apparent.
Same with you buddy you are living in England.

Again don't be a hypocrite.

People can live anywhere where they need to live.

Sometimes you have to go to places where you don't want to go in order to get something in life (e.g. education, better oportunities, job prospects).

Your humiliation and hypocrisy is quite apparent as well.
 
.
To @xenon54 @KediKesenFare and other Turkish members. By now you will have observed a phenomenon here. A visceral hatred of Isreal and general antipathy toward the west. You guys will be rather bemused about this because the sources of this hatred have little or zero geographic contact with Israel and are rather distant from the West. Here I am thinking of Pakistanis and even more so Bangladeshis. The reason is simple.

These countries were enslaved by European powers and were defeated cultures. Militarily, economically and politically they were castrated in the 1800s and had to face the humiliation of being political slaves of Western imperial rulers.

Take for example early 1900s. Every single group of peoples that you see today being so animated by their hatred of the West [hatred of Israel is a more concentrated version] were flat out slaves of the same West they despise today. Only Muslim peoples that faced the West in early 1900s when they rest were all enslaved were the Turks and Persians.

Defeatist Credo

It's interesting that today Turks and Persians are most at ease with the West. I don;'t mean here the politics of the Turkish or Iranian state - but rather the average people. Turks and Iranians tend to be cool with the West from cultural point of view. The Iranians do show some ambivalence but that is because they did get humilitated by the West to a degree,

The result of the enslavement of the ancestors of Pakistanis, Bangladeshis etc carries a terrible toll today. The defeat and humiliation at the hands of Western imperial powers left a terrible scar. A legacy of defeatism. The burden of which we still carry today and it still resonates in our day to day thinking.

This scar of humiliation - don't forget for over a century British ruled our part of the world like masters and trampled on our people. This crushing humiliation led a to defeatist credo which was pretty much composed of hatred of everything European. This defeatist credo was reflected in hatred of everything Western - culture, morals etc. Thus for example aversion to Latin script. It is not the script that they are averse to so much as what the context of the script is - Western domination and enslavement because the Latin script used by their masters. The script is being crucified by association.


Vicarious Living

Besides the defeatist credo there is another thread playing out. During the enslavement of our people [1850s onward] they found sanctuary from the terrible reality of being slaves of Western powers. To detach fom the terrible reality of being a crushed people ruled by few Western soldiers they began dreaming. Dreaming of the past golden age of Islam or began to dream of the great Ottoman Empire that was still though much weakened was still standing up against the West - the same West that had defeated and enslaved them. So they found a denominator that offered a release from their terrible reality. Since they were not Arabs or Turks they could not gain any comfort from the Ottoman Empire or the Ummayad Empire stressing ethnic identity merely exposed their enslavement. However by stressing the "Muslim" identity it enabled them to escape from their disgusting failure as a people. It amounted to stealing another peoples history.

Therefore they constructed a Muslim identity that deluded itself by living or thinking or acting as inheritors of the Ummayad or Ottoman Empires etc in the form of "Muslims". Thus people [Pakistanis, Banglas, Somalis, etc] who had nothing to do with those empire began living as vicarious khalifas - Ottoman, Ummayad, Rashidun etc. This offered a escape from the real reality of slavery and conquest by the West. Vicarious living provided a collective delusion out of humiliation.

Today we are victims of credo of defeatism which has been synthesised as Islam in the form you see in Pakistan etc. The reasons most of our Turkish members have difficulty in relating their easy going pragmatic Islam to the crude reactive Islam in members from South Asia is because the latter is the Islam mixed with the credo of defeatism.

That is why they get aghast at the thought of Latin script or anything to do with the West. For example in Pakistan our ancestors were using Greek script [from which Latin is derived[ as far back as 2,300 years ago. So it is not like Latin is entirely strange from our land. But the problem is Latin has become poisoned by the credo of defeatism. The Islam that you see being spouted from South Asia is nothing but credo of defeat and hate dressed with some rituals to give it the contours of Islam.

Building up on this credo of hate. You will notice that some of the most virulently anti-West Pakistanis or Banglas are those who actually live in the West. They are amongst the biggest dreamers of Muslim khalifas and look on at Ottoman Empire as if their great-grandads were sat in Topkapi Palace in Istanbul in 1900s. It is they who destest Ataturk for having gotten ride of "their" khalifa. The reason is again credo of hate and reaction. These individuals brought up in poor tough inner city areas of UK - children of migrants from regions that were defeated and colonized have struggled against racism from the wider white society. They have struggled to integrated. Partly because of their own fault but pattly because of racism.

This has reinforced the historical credo of hate and humiliation. Now added to the historcal humiliation of their forefathers they nurse the anger of being marginalized and being subjected to raciism. This has caused even more hate of the West and even stronger deataching from reality by retiring into the fantasy worlds of khalifas and Islamic empire where they imagine themselves to be the direct descendants of this historical supremacy.

I needed to explain this because Turks who have never been enslaved probably can't understand this complex history. I guess to a lesser degree the Eastern Europeans display something similar because they also were humiliated by the Turks. However unlike us the have found Western Europe/Russia as their saviour.

Therefore next time you see something innocent - maybe pair of trousers, skirt, shaving blade, simple Roman script etc. You see it as a neutral quantity. Our people see these as "loaded". Thus the bizzare reactions. The reaction against Israel is party fueled by their own conquest of their lands by the West. Israel is reminder to them of Western colonialism.

The day we can ovecome this legacy of defeat dressed as our Islam is the day we can move forward. Until then we are trapped in yessterday. That is why the Ottoman well is looked on as Turkish by you guys, the Ummayad well as Arab by guys like @Sharif al-Hijaz but our people insist on branding them as "Muslim" because that is the only way they can take a drink.

The only way Pakistanis can overcome from this colonial scar of being a vanquished people is by owning our own fantastic history going back to Harappa 7,000 BCE. That is why I have interest in history. The day our people fully own up our glorious history they won;t need to rely on milching other peoples history to overcome the shame of being subject peoples of the British Empire.

And the more our Turkish/Arab friends are blunt about this delusion of using "Muslim" tag to provide vicarious pride the faster our people will begin waking up from this delusion.
I agree with you completely. It's true that having being colonised and ruled by western powers countries like Pakistan, Bengladesh etc still have that defeatist mentality which affects their views, this coupled with religion (Islam) makes it even more obvious, reason they either look up to past Islamic/Muslim empires like Ottoman, Persian, Ummayad etc etc.
I think it's normal for them to feel that way, compared to Turkey who hasn't been colonised/subjugated and ruled by western powers in recent memory. So it's normal that a Turk won't have such ingrained enmity towards the West, neither will Turks look up to Arabs , Persians etc etc. Once a country has been colonised and subjugated in living memory , it will affect the way it's people view the world.
I believe it's for this reason you will hardly see a Turk who says he is Muslim first before Turk(or a Turk who puts religion before his country), meanwhile the same can't be said of many citizens from the South Asian Islamic countries you mentioned earlier. So I understand their way of thinking due to historical factors.
 
.
Nice try though.

Our Urdu script worlks well with the Arabic/Persian script.

Are you European or Turkish, because you use the Latin Alphabet which even Japan doesn't use.

Don't be a hypocrite.

Grow up!

Hit a nerve ???

As for question; I'm Turkish, i'm not proud or ashamed over some letters that we use.
 
.
Hmmm.....it seems that Atatürk guy is indeed very controversial. I suppose if he was alive today and ruling Turkey, then he wouldn't have an easy ride and might even be isolated regionally, since many people in the region and the country itself would have considered him as being against Islam, in this regard the country would have been in political turmoil/internal instability due to this.
Are you ok?
If Ataturk was alive,these ''Islamists'' would never have gotten to where they are now.
Using religion and Israel to gain votes is what they thrive on,take that away and they are nothing.
Ataturk would have hanged a couple of them to show the rest to either get in line or hide wherever they would keep quiet.
He would have the easiest ride of all politicians(he was a military man),people vote for Erdogan because there is no alternative.
My advice to you: ''Dont believe everything people write on a forum,do your own research and find out whats real and/or made up/fake information.''
 
Last edited:
.
Nice try though.

Our Urdu script worlks well with the Arabic/Persian script.

Are you European or Turkish, because you use the Latin Alphabet which even Japan doesn't use.

Don't be a hypocrite.

Grow up!




I am talking about the script, not the language of Arabic.

lol. You Turks use the Latin script. Are you French or Turkish.

Again grow up.

What is wrong with using the Persian script when our language works well with it.

Again don't be an idiot and argue with facts.

I am a Turk, what are you is the question you should be asking especially when the script you use was enforced on you by your conquerors, the Turks / Mongols etc

Stop taking things out of your arse, who said anything about Persian / Arabic script being wrong? quote me or f off. Latin script works well with Turkish, do you have a problem with that? If you haven't realised you are communicating to the world using Latin script, not Persian or Arabic.
 
.
Hit a nerve ???

As for question; I'm Turkish, i'm not proud or ashamed over some letters that we use.
Not at all. You did not hit any nerve. I am Pakistani and i am proud of who we are.
 
. .
how was gaddafi a dog he made mistakes but tell me which leaders haven't. he provided for the population more than any other leader has done for their own country. for example housing, cars, education, healthcare, food, agriculture land/machines, he built the man made river project in the desert. his mistake trusting other sellout Zionist puppet arab countries, people around him were sellout jackals, he didnt built up military deterrence.

he paid for africa satelite which cut out british/usa firms which pist them off. he was going to unite africa as united state of africa, on gold and silver no more rothschild/imf bank.

The money from oil sales a percentage went straight into the bank accounts of the people.

which leader can drive his car down the road and be greeted only gaddafi. the rest need 100 guards around them etc.

You are right,Gaddafi was a true leader to his people,he did everything for his people and countries in need(Africa),i liked him alot and what some of my fellow Turkish members dont know is that he helped my country in times of need.
He was a true friend to my country and people.
http://www.ciftlikdergisi.com.tr/kaddafinin-ulkemize-yaptiklari-unutulmamali.html
Tell him to read the above.
Do you know what this government(Erdogan) did to Gaddafi?
A stab in the back is what he got from my country.

http://blog.milliyet.com.tr/kaddafi-libyasi-ve-kaddafi-nin-mektubu/Blog/?BlogNo=427596
Above is the letter he wrote to my country.
Its in Turkish,couldnt find any translation.
The only mistakes Gaddafi made were his foreign policy(US) and his support for some radical groups.
May he rest in peace in Cennet.
 
Last edited:
.
I am a Turk, what are you is the question you should be asking especially when the script you use was enforced on you by your conquerors, the Turks / Mongols etc
Stop taking things out of your arse, who said anything about Persian / Arabic script being wrong? quote me or f off. Latin script works well with Turkish, do you have a problem with that? If you haven't realised you are communicating to the world using Latin script, not Persian or Arabic.
Firstly it was an Uzbek (Babur) who conquered Pakistan. Secondly calm down. I do not care about Turkey. Turkish people can do what they think is right for themselves. Urdu works well with the Persian script.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom