What's new

Why should Pakistan take back convicted British paedophiles?

Pakistan or any other country should take back such people unless the people in question gained their citizenship from being born into that country. i.e.People who gain citizenship through the naturalization process (and not by being born in that country), are given that citizenship on the conditionality they will be good citizens.

If Pakistan or any country refuses to take such criminals back, then all visas and legal immigration should be banned from being issued and accepted from that country. That will force the issue easily.
 
Pakistan or any other country should take back such people unless the people in question gained their citizenship from being born into that country. i.e.People who gain citizenship through the naturalization process (and not by being born in that country), are given that citizenship on the conditionality they will be good citizens.

If Pakistan or any country refuses to take such criminals back, then all visas and legal immigration should be banned from being issued and accepted from that country. That will force the issue easily.

they should get harshest punishment even if they return to their country of origin .
 
At no point did I say this is not disgusting and vile. I actually condemned it. But the fact is what i said is going on in every city in UK. The culprits are vile men and equally the failed parents. How is me merely pointing out what goes on make me complicit. What I said is what you hear is driven by a agenda. Non of the men involved are innocent but I don't like how one demograhic is pulled out and pasted on papers everyday while Leroy Black and Piotr walk around looking smug. Or Jimmy Saville buddies. Epstien did this for decades. Before this Roman Polanski got away scot free. Nobody said Jews are sex groomers?
Read this crap and you will see how pervasive sex abuse is in UK. It ran even right to the top of government.

Leon Brittan among senior Westminster figures named in new child abuse files
This article is more than 5 years old
Peter Morrison, Peter Hayman and William van Straubenzee also named in previously unreleased documents, which police will pass to ongoing inquiry
Leon Brittan

The papers pertaining to Leon Brittan were contained in a store of Cabinet Office papers at the National Archives, accumulated over several decades up to 2007. Photograph: John Stillwell/PA

Ben Quinn and Josh Halliday
Thu 23 Jul 2015 07.49 BST
First published on Wed 22 Jul 2015 21.19 BST


Government papers about the former home secretary Leon Brittan are among a fresh batch of documents which have come to light months after the conclusion of an official review into whether allegations of child abuse were covered up by the Home Office in the 1980s.
The documents also reveal that the then director general of MI5 corresponded with the Cabinet Secretary in 1986 about an unnamed MP who was alleged to have “a penchant for small boys” but accepted the politican’s word that he did not.

The letter from Sir Anthony Duff to Sir Robert Armstrong added: “At the present stage ... the risks of political embarrassment to the government is rather greater than the security danger.”
Making it clear that they are “concerned and disappointed” about not being told earlier about the documents, the authors of a report earlier this year into allegations historical child abuse by powerful figures cited the letter as a “striking example” of how crimes against children were not considered as seriously as they would today.
“The risk to children is not considered at all,” Peter Wanless, chief executive of the NSPCC, and barrister Richard Whittam, said in a supplement to their review, published online on Wednesday.
The Home Office said a fresh search of the archives had been carried out after a file emerged earlier this year that should have been submitted to Wanless and Whittam.
Previously unreleased files also concern figures including Margaret Thatcher’s parliamentary private secretary, the late Sir Peter Morrison, former diplomat Sir Peter Hayman and former minister Sir William van Straubenzee.
The papers pertaining to Brittan, which are among a number shown to police, are contained in a store of Cabinet Office papers at the National Archives, known as “the cabinet secretary’s miscellaneous papers” and will be passed to an ongoing independent inquiry into child abuse within state and non-state institutions led by Justice Lowell Goddard. The papers are described by the Cabinet Office as largely uncatalogued and unregistered, and were accumulated over several decades up to 2007. No further details have so far been revealed.

Wanless and Whittam called for a broader search of material at government departments after the Cabinet Office and Home Office informed them that further relevant material had been found.
The papers also contain material on allegations by a former British army intelligence agent, Colin Wallace, about the Kincora boys’ home in Northern Ireland, which has long been at the centre of abuse claims.
The Wanless review, published in November after the investigation of 114 missing Home Office files, could not rule out the possibility of files being destroyed as part of a coverup of child abuse allegations in the 1980s. But the inquiry concluded that record-keeping practices at the time meant it was not possible to reach a categorical decision either way.
In a joint letter written in June, Wanless and Whittam said the discovery illustrated the merit of a wide-ranging search “unconstrained by what the Home Office in particular might or might not have known, with departments paying particular attention to relevant material that is not registered. We anticipate that the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse chaired by Justice Goddard would expect no less”.
They revealed that the Cabinet Office permanent secretary, Richard Heaton, wrote to Wanless in May apologising for a “flaw in the way the Cabinet Office initially responded” to their request for documents, and confirming that three categories of papers have since been identified as potentially relevant.
“We are concerned and disappointed that the Cabinet Office was aware of the separate Cabinet Office store of assorted and unstructured papers, yet informed us that the searches covered all records and files held,” the note said.
The recently unearthed material does not suggest that documents relating to Sir Peter Hayman, a senior diplomat linked to a paedophile scandal, had been destroyed, the co-authors said. However, they added: “That said, it is essential that the public have confidence in the searches that were undertaken, not least because we had to rely on the efficiency and integrity of those who sought material on our behalf. The emergence of these papers only after our review had completed is not helpful in that regard.”
It has also emerged that the Home Office failed to review unregistered government documents held at the National Archives for the Wanless review. They were only searched later following a request from MP John Hemming and a national newspaper.
“Whilst it is important that these files have been identified, as they tell outside our terms of reference, it is not for us to examine them now. Their discovery reflects the known restricted nature of our review,” the co-authors said, adding that “a broader search of material” should now be undertaken.
In a written ministerial statement, May said: “The supplementary report concludes that the discovery of these papers shows the need for all departments to be able to search material both on and off record managements systems. This is particularly important given that the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse will be asking for departments to produce relevant documents in the near future.
“I have been clear that it is vital that the whole of government fully cooperates with the inquiry on its important work and ensures that departments have the systems and processes in place in order to do so.”


Topics


What about our paedophile aka Mullahs of Pakistani Madrassas?...Whom you will blame there? Parents, Culture, System, Mentality?.....
 
No Mate..it's about " People who live in glass houses, must not throw stones at others". Hope you understood.
By using this logic no one should ever be held accountable because who knows what skeletons prosecutors have buried in their closet.
 
This sort of thing is so common in UK that you could as easily start fishing for Indians and every week you would have mug shots of Indians on papers. By the way the biggest groomers are Blacks and East Europeans. They do it on industrial scale. These Pakistani idiots are lowly taxi driver who begins banging a local tramp, then desperate lala at the take away also begins banging her for donner kebab, then the shop keeper also begins banging for crisp packets etc. Then one day they all get pulled in when social workers ask the girl and she names lala, ali, mohammed etc. Next thing they are recorded as public enemy number one. Please do not think I saying there is justification to this. But fact is Lucy would have been selling her cherry anyway and will continue doing so. Reason being is she was probably abused by her step dad at 9, then got screwed by drunk uncle John at 10. By 13 her cherry was public property and she treated it as such.

Now think of the industrial groomers like Leroy Black with a gold tooth who uses pliers to pul his girls finger nails if they don't bring enough money to him. These girls are so terrified that they will never and I mean never tell even the police even if they offer them 24 hour protection. Or Piotr from Albania who will chop his girls with meat cleaver and has 30 nderage girls locked in houses being used 24/7. Non of this will ever make it to the courts and even if it does the girls will never talkto anybody.

Meantime lala is in proson for 15 years because one day he got a chance to polish his old wilted stick and was dumb enough to go ahead after all dozen others were being polished by Lucy.

your basic point is noted. it is not like the pakistani culprits were outed right away. some of the crimes against British Pakistani criminals date back to 1990s. They were convicted in 2012.

if the british learnt a lesson they would ban immigration of lower class pakistanis
This sort of thing is so common in UK that you could as easily start fishing for Indians and every week you would have mug shots of Indians on papers. By the way the biggest groomers are Blacks and East Europeans. They do it on industrial scale. These Pakistani idiots are lowly taxi driver who begins banging a local tramp, then desperate lala at the take away also begins banging her for donner kebab, then the shop keeper also begins banging for crisp packets etc. Then one day they all get pulled in when social workers ask the girl and she names lala, ali, mohammed etc. Next thing they are recorded as public enemy number one. Please do not think I saying there is justification to this. But fact is Lucy would have been selling her cherry anyway and will continue doing so. Reason being is she was probably abused by her step dad at 9, then got screwed by drunk uncle John at 10. By 13 her cherry was public property and she treated it as such.

Now think of the industrial groomers like Leroy Black with a gold tooth who uses pliers to pul his girls finger nails if they don't bring enough money to him. These girls are so terrified that they will never and I mean never tell even the police even if they offer them 24 hour protection. Or Piotr from Albania who will chop his girls with meat cleaver and has 30 nderage girls locked in houses being used 24/7. Non of this will ever make it to the courts and even if it does the girls will never talkto anybody.

Meantime lala is in proson for 15 years because one day he got a chance to polish his old wilted stick and was dumb enough to go ahead after all dozen others were being polished by Lucy.

@Indus Pakistan
let us be considerate towards the victims. the whole episode is sickening at multiple levels
 
This is a great thread....I did some coverage on it around 18 months back

 
What about our paedophile aka Mullahs of Pakistani Madrassas?...Whom you will blame there? Parents, Culture, System, Mentality?.....
While polishing gora Ls, you forgot you quoting a British Pakistani and the topic is pedophilia in UK and not your experiences with the local maulvi.
What about our paedophile aka Mullahs of Pakistani Madrassas?...Whom you will blame there? Parents, Culture, System, Mentality?.....
Also what's "ours"? You piss slurper. You ain't even Pakistani.. worry bout 60% children of your effan country's children who are victims of the abuse you trying to associate with Pakistani Culture. You dog raping piece of dung.
 
Last edited:
your basic point is noted. it is not like the pakistani culprits were outed right away. some of the crimes against British Pakistani criminals date back to 1990s. They were convicted in 2012.

if the british learnt a lesson they would ban immigration of lower class pakistanis


@Indus Pakistan
let us be considerate towards the victims. the whole episode is sickening at multiple levels
You stupid zionazi fk. All of these men were British born and represent .1% of the British pedophile gangs who are mostly white followed by blacks.
Also what is lower class Pakistanis? Who the hell are you? Prince Andrews f..toy,
See this is what I was talking about on other thread.. .. Always white knighting the white folks
Hari putars always has a mouthful.
 
While polishing gora Ls, you forgot you quoting a British Pakistani and the topic is pedophilia in UK and not your experiences with the local maulvi.

Also what's "ours"? You piss slurper. You ain't even Pakistani.. worry bout 60% children of your effan country's children who are victims of the abuse you trying to associate with Pakistani Culture. You dog raping piece of dung.

Mr. Desert Fighter.... I can imagine how well cultured your childhood had been and what kind of values you inherited. Please don't make it public.

and please Thank Allah that people like you with such language and thought process can be titled as "Elite" only in PDF. I would not even like to piss on you.
 
You stupid zionazi fk. All of these men were British born and represent .1% of the British pedophile gangs who are mostly white followed by blacks.
Also what is lower class Pakistanis? Who the hell are you? Prince Andrews f..toy,

if you want the right to immigrate you better shape up
 
Back
Top Bottom