I guess you have no clue about actual discussion
according to Nawaz sharif he needed Ikama and requirement of iqama was to be working and receiving a salary so he appointed himself as chairman of his son company but did not received any income and it was just existed on paper and since he did not received any money then he did not declared it in nomination paper priot to 2013 election so that's why all this debate
I would have not mind the judgement of disqualification if it was based on corruption or money laundering charges after due process and trial rather than just him not being sadiq and not declaring those few lakhs which they claim that they did not received from company of his son. Its very weak legal argument to disqualify when you had plenty others serious charges