As if something worthwhile is being talked about here on this very thread ? Ironic isn't it that we're all discussing to death how a piece of cloth epitomizes intellectually/civil slavery or emancipation and that we're all men who are vociferously vouching for or against a piece of clothing particular to women. One might be forgiven for thinking that in our zeal to have an opinion on things we vouch so ardently for things that are inherently trivial and yet are attached an sense of importance to them simply because someone somewhere thought that they couldn't control their emotions enough to either stand up for it or against it.
This is a non issue ! Its the same bs that we've been talking about for hundreds of years ! Let the women decide what they want...they are Muslims too, they have minds of their own too and one might even argue minds that are more focused and disciplined than many of their male counterparts. Let them decide on a personal level what they think is 'right', what are the 'limits' and what does one do if those limits are 'transgressed'.
Ideally there really shouldn't arise a time when we're talking about these things as if all the other problems facing the Muslim world have evaporated ! But if there needs to be a decision or a closure of sorts about this on a collective level then man hasn't come up with a better system of to determine what is 'right and wrong', 'reasonable and unreasonable' and 'acceptable and unacceptable' at a collective level then the 'democratic process'. However much dysfunctional it maybe...it remains, by far, the best system out there to answer these question. I don't for a second say that what is decided in a gathering is absolutely 'right', what was admonished was absolutely 'wrong' and that sense and reason prevailed for that is clearly not the case but the 'democratic process' brings with it three things that makes it the only viable option that we have - 1) the assumption that collective wisdom will prevail and that we will not agree in error. 2) because the will of the majority prevails it will have a deep sense of ownership across the society and also how more often than not because compromises and concessions are made to bring about a consensus of sorts, even significant numbers from the minority faction can be brought on board alongside the majority. And 3) what is the alternative ? Either God sends someone from up above to solve our problems as he/she sees it fit or we as individuals pick up clubs and machetes to enforce our opinion.
I firmly believe that these decisions pertaining to a hijab or something similar on an individualistic or collective level must come from the women themselves instead of men imposing their own will for it will never stick and the brewing resentment would be always there. Let the women decide and let us stand by to offer our support if need be.
Having said that I can't help but voice the absurdity of pegging women's emancipation or subjugation to a piece of clothing and then presenting it as an idea worth taking sides over. Our real issues are much more clear cut and in this context the issue isn't whether its a 'hijab' or a 'bikini' its 'letting the women decide themselves' instead of 'men imposing their view point'.