Leave 2030, Delhi would have 500 km+ metro & 3 RRTS lines by 2030...
Good for any developments in India.
BD is progressing well with the help of it's partners and so no need for butt-hurt people to comment when
it is not wanted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Leave 2030, Delhi would have 500 km+ metro & 3 RRTS lines by 2030...
Of course, as a suppa pawa citizen you can't accept anything better or bigger in Bangladesh than India. That's why first 3 points are false and the last 3 are true.
What the Indian fools here do not understand is that BD is a very densely populated country and so the extra cost compared to India does not matter as more people will be able to use the facilities. Cost per person is about the same.
So much butt-hurt that Japan and BD have linked up to build a world class Metro and transport system for Dhaka by 2035.
Lol its ur country men who started this comparison. Everyone here agrees that its a good project but BD ppl here are comparing it with indian metro systems and saying its better, and when presented facts that is not, you are coming up with rhetorics. There is no sense in comparing so guys just move on and don't compare urself with our systems which have been operating here for longer than even the time Dhaka metro idea has been around.Good for any developments in India.
BD is progressing well with the help of it's partners and so no need for butt-hurt people to comment when
it is not wanted.
I thought there were enough debates on this topic...
The cost per km of Indian metro rails here includes underground sections. Dhaka metro's line 6 is elevated & it should be compared to elevated lines only.
1. Mumbai metro, Delhi metro (older lines) stations are designed for eight coach rakes whereas Delhi metro phase III, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata etc are designed for six coach rakes. These aren't smaller than Dhaka metro.
2. Again no, see this news article about Dhaka metro rolling stock.
The cars will be 19·8 m long, 4·1 m high and 2950 mm wide
http://www.metro-report.com/news/si...a-dream-as-rolling-stock-contract-signed.html
Nearly all heavy/medium metro rail carriages in India have same width & are longer at 21.6-22.6 m. The Delhi & Hyderabad RS are wider at 3.2m.
3. I wouldn't comment as this is not a field I am interested in. I think @Chaosmaster have answered it correctly.
4. Agreed, but shouldn't that reflect on O&M cost rather than construction cost ?
5. Because we have enough expertise & we employ Indian consultants.
6. Indian made rolling stock is cheaper, but isn't as cheap as what is made out here.
Refer the above link which states that or Dhaka rolling stock where the average cost of a carriage comes to around ~$2.5 million. Compare that to this Kolkata metro contract where cost is around $1.6 million per carriage.
http://themetrorailguy.com/2017/06/22/kmrc-unveils-design-of-kolkata-metros-new-beml-trains/
So Japanese rolling stock wouldn't increase definitely will not increase cost as much as argued here.
BD is paragon of truth in the world hehe, world's most transparent and highest credibility, all thanks to the omega-3, marine protein and BBSSSSSSS
Nope, BD media is the god's honest truth bro. They have never ever been wrong on a single thing before lol....much less deliberately reported falsehoods..... BD is paragon of truth in the world hehe, world's most transparent and highest credibility, all thanks to the omega-3, marine protein and BBSSSSSSS @django @Game.Invade @Major Sam @Valar.
How does that make sense when the elevated one itself is much costlier than the underground one built in another country?Yes, underground lines are 3 times more costly as elevated ones. that's why BD line should be compared with only elevated line to make the comparison more fair.
View attachment 458996
https://www.dmtc.org.bd/photographs#!prettyPhoto[gallery216]/8/
Are you guys talking about this tin can???
Lol you are the one who is butthurt ... Under ground network is cheaper than yours...
Corruption coupled with incompetence, ignorant journalists and backing of people justifying this on baseless grounds can do wonders.How does that make sense when the elevated one itself is much costlier than the underground one built in another country?
Why is it so hard for people to get that building metros in Dhaka would cost much more than Indian cities? Dhaka is the densest city on earth, by a huge margin. Land is very costly and there's little to no space. You have to remove all the previous infrastructures, like electric cables, water pipeline and everything out of the way of where the metro line would be and re-wire or implement them in different places.
Why is it so hard for people to get that building metros in Dhaka would cost much more than Indian cities? Dhaka is the densest city on earth, by a huge margin. Land is very costly and there's little to no space. You have to remove all the previous infrastructures, like electric cables, water pipeline and everything out of the way of where the metro line would be and re-wire or implement them in different places. Also, this is the first one and is being done by foreign institute JICA and have to import a lot of things.
Have you? Dhaka has density of 44,500/km2 and second Mumbai has 31,700/km2 which is a gigantic difference. And as for the idiot that bought Delhi, 10th densest city has 9,600/km2 and your Delhi isn't even in the top 10.Ever heard of the city of Bombay?