What's new

Why is KSA hosting Pak, Turk and Egypt leaders in same week?

I think Iran might have been the main topic of discussion.

You are not this important, lol.

The main topic was/is obviously the MB and then regional events. Aside from increasing Saudi Arabian (potentially GCC)-Turkish relations on the economic front.

After all KSA and Turkey are the only G-20 major economies member states in the ME. A lot of unfulfilled potential in this department.
 
The US, Israel, China, all have significant amounts of nukes, power to deliver them and the ability to sustain a serious conflict, but never have I ever seen leaders of the most powerful countries talking about "wiping off their enemies from the map". And you think a country with this attitude (Iran that is), should have nukes?? No wonder the Israelis, the Saudis and everyone else is concerned about any deal with Iran on this.

Exactly. Iran is not capable of "wiping anyone off the map" even if it wanted to, so don't take the rhetoric too seriously. And don't put words in my mouth, I never said "Iran should have nukes" How did you even manage to reach that sort of conclusion from my previous post?

You are not this important, lol.

The main topic was/is obviously the MB and then regional events. Aside from increasing Saudi Arabian (potentially GCC)-Turkish relations on the economic front.

After all KSA and Turkey are the only G-20 major economies member states in the ME. A lot of unfulfilled potential in this department.

Ok bro, good to know.
 
Egypt, Turkiye, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. The Fantastic Four.


1zvwpaa.jpg


I think Iran might have been the main topic of discussion.

What's also interesting is PM Netanyahu came to US recently and talked to Congress about Iran's nuclear program.
 
What's also interesting is PM Netanyahu came to US recently and talked to Congress about Iran's nuclear program.

Makes sense, that's why Iran should not have exchanged Israel with Palestinians after the revolution. Iran will never be accepted as an Islamic country, it doesn't follow the "true" version of Islam, our place has been and will always be with Israel and US. Unfortunately foolish leaders of IRI don't understand that.
 
I think Iran might have been the main topic of discussion.
more precisely, the real topic is what to do against Iran. So, it's really ridiculous to invite Iran.

What would be each country's role?
Pakistan& Egypt >> Cannon fodder
Turkey>>Transferring fighters(terrorists or freedom fighters or oppositions or whatever term you guys call them in your dictionary) to Syria and providing logistics
KSA>>Finance and providing political support in West

2 points:
1. Such alliance would not last long for obvious reasons.
2. It's new to see Pakistan openly playing against Iran. Iran's reaction regarding India-Pak conflicts is what I am waiting to see in future.
 
Iran's reaction regarding India-Pak conflicts is what I am waiting to see in future.

Iran and his followers allegiance has always been with hindus, than anything else.... what has Iran done for kashmiris?
 
Iran and his followers allegiance has always been with hindus, than anything else.... what has Iran done for kashmiris?

Yeah, that's why Iran supplied arms for Pakistan in fights against India? You are another dumb I guess.
Anyway, I personally think that Iran was wrong in supporting Pakistan. India has a much bigger economy, and more potentials to become a global power.
 
KSA has some plans I think for Sunni world they are thinking of something new
 
Wait.....cleaning up the mess like what? Like the organizations you support, such as Hizbullah? Hamas? open air threats for the destruction of Israel, stopping the global trade through closing down the state of Homez? And you call these serious threats "cleaning up after others"??? And Iran supplying rockets and missiles to its brothers in Arms in Lebanon, Syria or Palestine aren't terrorist because they are Shiites??

Let's see, have I ever seen a more blatant threat from Saudi or Pakistani or Turkish leaders to another nation, like we'll wipe you off the map???

The US, Israel, China, all have significant amounts of nukes, power to deliver them and the ability to sustain a serious conflict, but never have I ever seen leaders of the most powerful countries talking about "wiping off their enemies from the map". And you think a country with this attitude (Iran that is), should have nukes?? No wonder the Israelis, the Saudis and everyone else is concerned about any deal with Iran on this.

You can NEVER allow a country with this behavior to have anything serious, let alone actual nukes. How about a HELL NO for a response?
You are right. Right now, there is 'NO' politics going on in Iran, and there has been none for a long time now.

They need to learn how to do politics. All they do is threatening left and right with nonsense, I don't even know why they do that..

I'd understand it if it were Israel or Russia, as such statements obviously work for their domestic politics just before the elections..

But Iran is like this 'ALWAYS', even though there is not really a real political atmosphere in the country in the first place.

So, either there is 'ALWAYS' general elections in Iran, which is not the case as the case is mostly the opposite, or Iran really doesn't know how to do politics.


They need mature and real politicians, and 'THEN' Iran would be able to be taken seriously in political scene.
 
You prove yourself right first. You presented an accusation, and the accuser is the one who provides proof not the defender. (Guys wait for the flood of "Experts Articles" and the such since they don't have anything else).

Why do I need some "expert" articles to prove myself? Your biggest allies have been saying it since day one.

Yeah, that's why Iran supplied arms for Pakistan in fights against India? You are another dumb I guess.
Anyway, I personally think that Iran was wrong in supporting Pakistan.
:lol:
It's called business. When war comes, a country will try to sell as many of its arms to the other countries to make a quick buck. Nothing to do with friendship. There are some exceptions.
And what are you talking about? The current government of Iran has barely helped Pakistanis in the wars against India. It was Reza Shah Pahlavi who was one aiding us during the wars against India and last time I checked, he was driven away by crackpot clerics.

We should not participate in any sunni or shia alliance.

This 100%. No more alliances with Iran or Saudi Arabia, the cancers of the Muslim world.
 
something is definitely cooking....nawaz sharif already visited KSA recently to meet with the new king salman. So for another non-planned sudden visit - means something must be going on. Just not sure what it is.

i hope it's related to Afghanistan and has nothing to do with Syria or Yemen.....those 2 countries and their internal affairs at this time are none of our concern, and should NOT be
 
You are not this important, lol.

The main topic was/is obviously the MB and then regional events. Aside from increasing Saudi Arabian (potentially GCC)-Turkish relations on the economic front.

After all KSA and Turkey are the only G-20 major economies member states in the ME. A lot of unfulfilled potential in this department.
Sorry, but we will surpass everyone else by far once the 'peace process' is settled, and we get to join the Schengen and EFTA :chilli:
 
Considering the on going conspiracies against the prominent Muslim countries, it's the need of time to sit together and draw a common plan to avert the incoming onslaught...

to do that, the OIC should organize a conference - in some neutral country.....the Saudis/Gulf arabs need to sit down with the Iranians and Syrians if the dialog is to have any meaning or substance
 
Tuesday - Nawaz Sharif
Actually, Nawaz Sharif is there to negotiate a deal for more killing off of Pakistani endangered species birds by wealthy Saudi Princes.

And perhaps a begging bowl for more free money in exchange for unconditional loyalty.
 
Back
Top Bottom