What's new

WHY DOES PAKISTAN ACCUSE INDIAN SPIES OF TERRORISM?

Lol Unamed Col of ISI. Is that the best you can come up with? Even Ajmal kasab after intensive torture started saying mera bharat mahan. If you take his statement to a court it will take the accused one day to be declared innocent.
Nope, David Headly is what I came up with. Conveniently skipped the Mj Iqbal part.. but hey, you need to start denial somewhere, right? Just out of curiosity, what kind of evidence you are looking for before accepting pak agencies have hand in propagating terrorism in India?
 
.
Irony..... There used to be an epicentre......

:lol: look at the paid garbage write up and title. Accusing Indian spies of terrorism :lol: well no it is accusing Indian State of terrorism and rightly so.

India is involved in terrorism against Pakistan at State level
 
.
Nope, David Headly is what I came up with. Conveniently skipped the Mj Iqbal part.. but hey, you need to start denial somewhere, right? Just out of curiosity, what kind of evidence you are looking for before accepting pak agencies have hand in propagating terrorism in India?

If you know about espinoge activities then you would know that Major Iqbal doesnt exist. Iqbal is conivinient cover and popular name, So stop being foolish. Hence couple of emails dont prove as it could be any agency / individual trying to tarnish the name of ISI. Secondly time when Headly was caught US was pretty pissed at pakistan for not doing much so i wouldnt be surprised if they took a stooge to the stage to make indians happy. Also this prove my point

After Army’s Myanmar strike, Rathore tweets: ‘Message to Pak, #56inchrocks’ | The Indian Express
 
Last edited:
.
If you know about espinoge activities then you would know that Major Iqbal doesnt exist. Iqbal is conivinient cover and popular name, So stop being foolish. Hence couple of emails dont prove as it could be any agency / individual trying to tarnish the name of ISI. Secondly time when Headly was caught US was pretty pissed at pakistan for not doing much so i wouldnt be surprised if they took a stooge to the stage to make indians happy. Also this prove my point

After Army’s Myanmar strike, Rathore tweets: ‘Message to Pak, #56inchrocks’ | The Indian Express
So, how long and to what extent you can keep denying the facts? Emails are false, intercepts are false, people do not exist etc etc while not doing anything to investigate qny leads. Then ask for proof? It is like asking to describe color white while refusing to open your eyes and pretending to be a born blind...
 
.
So, how long and to what extent you can keep denying the facts? Emails are false, intercepts are false, people do not exist etc etc while not doing anything to investigate qny leads. Then ask for proof? It is like asking to describe color white while refusing to open your eyes and pretending to be a born blind...

It is easy to make stuff up like linking ISI with email which you probably read about in an indian news paper. Anyways whatever makes you happy but reality is that you people havnt got squat. If i take your word for it you are saying that saying ISI Major sent an email directly to his asset by mentioning that he is an ISI agent along with his name then i can only say all hail your intelligence level.
 
.
Indian Defence minister admitted indian support to terrorists , also Modi admitted past indian involvement with terrorists in East Pakistan , there is no accusation , this india admitting guilt
 
.
Well unless you know for a fact that he is not a Raw agent then he will remain a suspect. Secondly Pakistan recently gave proof of indian involvement both to US and India so i doubt anyone is innocent here. Most of the Indians here on PDF are hypocrites and duel faced. In one sentence you people gloat about involvement of Raw and in the next you try to portray yourself as some angels who never sinned in their life. Your own defence minister got pumped with adrenaline rush and started speaking about supporting terrorists so i doubt your statement merit any weight here.



US created terrorists to disintegrate countries latest in the long list of creation is ISIS. ISIS was brewed in order to tackle iran but like always $hit splattered on their own faces. Iran is supporting terror outfits like hammas and hizbullah. Afghanistan what can i say the name speaks for itslef.

UK and switzerland and even afghanistan with the help of indians is harbouring millitant leaders as well. MQM used Mohajir card and used it to create militant wing in karachi. Weapons were recovered from their head office entire media filmed that so dont know what are you trying to defend here. MQM is a lost cause with their leader facing money laundering and possibiliy murder charges in london.

The defense minister didn't name pakistan..its ironic that pakistan should feel that it's them that he is talking about..The guilt factor stepped in...as for what he said..terrorists will kill terrorists..assuming that it indeed is pakistan he is talking about then....kindly understand the context with which he says so..He has been a DM for a few months while mqm and ttp have been in pakistan for the last how many years?

Ironic is that if Pakistan projects itself as the victim ..that is the first party..The so called terrorist..and the aggressor...the terrorist...Both happen to be pakistani. Please tell me which international terrorist is UK, Switzerland and India harboring?.
 
.
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&r...=qHDLUV2kwEMIENvUpIqv4w&bvm=bv.95277229,d.dGY

What lies behind Pakistani charges of Indian 'terrorism'

By M Ilyas KhanBBC News, Islamabad
  • 6 May 2015
  • From the sectionAsia
_82794581_82794575.jpg

Baloch separatists have been waging a bitter war against the Pakistani army for years (image from 2006)
Why would Pakistan's army accuse Indian intelligence of "whipping up terrorism" in Pakistan?

The accusation levelled at India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) came in astatement issued by the army's media wing. There was no mention of any specific incident, but privately military officials have been blaming India for involvement in a separatist insurgency in Pakistan's south-western province of Balochistan.

Many say it is probably the first time a Pakistani authority outside political or diplomatic spheres has publicly named an Indian institution in this manner.

They see this assertiveness as a sign of the Pakistani army's growing willingness to be seen to be dictating the country's foreign and national security policies.

It comes as the army tries to face the triple threat of the Pakistani Taliban, Baloch insurgents and a complicated mix of urban crime, ethnic, linguistic, religious, sectarian and political rivalries in the country's biggest city, Karachi.

It also indicates a toughening of Pakistan's position against India at a time when the Pakistani army is emerging as one of the chief guarantors of peace in Afghanistan, in partnership with China.

Any failure to deliver on this score is likely to weaken Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, an apparent ally of Pakistan, and strengthen pro-India forces in Kabul.

Conversely, any arm-twisting by the military to force the Afghan Taliban to the dialogue table may antagonise them and thereby deprive Islamabad of a proxy to check the spread of Indian influence in Afghanistan.

_81419305_81419304.jpg

Abdul Qadeer Baloch campaigns for the families of those who have disappeared in conflicts
Pakistan has long accused India of fuelling insurgency in Balochistan. Officials say Indian spies are operating through a network of Indian missions dotting southern and eastern Afghanistan, where most Baloch insurgents are also based.

The military believes India also has involvement in Karachi, Pakistan's largest and most volatile city. This suggestion comes from a recent claim by a senior police officer - believed to be the mouthpiece of the military - that RAW helped a Karachi-based party.

Observers say the Pakistani army has been soft-pedalling in the fight against the Afghan Taliban as well as anti-India militant groups based in Pakistan, but it has come down hard on Baloch insurgents and political activists.

Over the years, hundreds of Baloch activists have gone missing, most of them turning up dead on the streets or across the vast wilderness of the province. Locals blame all these disappearances and killings on the army and its surrogate groups, a charge the army denies.

More recently, however, it has moved more openly to curb movement and debate by Baloch rights activists.

In March, authorities at Karachi airport stopped three Baloch activists from proceeding to New York to participate in a seminar on human rights violations in Balochistan and Sindh province.

One of them was Mama Qadeer, a 70-year-old Baloch rights activist who shot to fame when he walked 3,000km (1,860 miles) from Quetta to Islamabad last year to protest over killings in Balochistan.

In April, two men introducing themselves as ISI operatives handed a written "order" to the management of Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), asking it to cancel a talk which featured Mama Qadeer.

_82794574_bf4cbd3a-0177-4957-821b-c31946f86352.jpg

The murder of Sabeen Mehmud provoked outrage from civil society
While LUMS gave in, on 25 April a similar talk went ahead at The Second Floor (T2F), a tea house-cum-book store in Karachi, despite what some activists claim were "warnings" not to hold the event.

Within an hour, the moderator of that talk and head of T2F, Sabeen Mehmud, 40, was shot dead by unknown gunmen while driving home in her car.

The incident sparked protests across the country, with civil society groups and several newspaper columnists accusing the ISI directly or more subtly for the murder.

The pressure grew so much that the army had to issue a separate statement condemning Ms Mehmud's murder, apparently to distance itself from the incident.

Many believe the army's latest statement about RAW may be equally meant to deflect this wave of public criticism
 
.
The defense minister didn't name pakistan..its ironic that pakistan should feel that it's them that he is talking about..The guilt factor stepped in...as for what he said..terrorists will kill terrorists..assuming that it indeed is pakistan he is talking about then....kindly understand the context with which he says so..He has been a DM for a few months while mqm and ttp have been in pakistan for the last how many years?

Ironic is that if Pakistan projects itself as the victim ..that is the first party..The so called terrorist..and the aggressor...the terrorist...Both happen to be pakistani. Please tell me which international terrorist is UK, Switzerland and India harboring?.
Whatever the context was he openly admitted to terror activities.
First of all Harbiyaar Muree leader of BRA a known terrorist outfit responsible for killing hundreds of soldiers and civilians in pakistan. UK has given him ssylum. Switzerland is housing Barahamdhag bhugti leader of BLA. Both leaders openly claim the attacks on pakistani soil.
 
.
Whatever the context was he openly admitted to terror activities.
First of all Harbiyaar Muree leader of BRA a known terrorist outfit responsible for killing hundreds of soldiers and civilians in pakistan. UK has given him ssylum. Switzerland is housing Barahamdhag bhugti leader of BLA. Both leaders openly claim the attacks on pakistani soil.

Maree and bugti...are they declared terrorists?
 
.
Maree and bugti...are they declared terrorists?

Both are leaders of terror outfits which claim attacks on civilians and government on regular basis so do you still need deceleration?
 
.
It is easy to make stuff up like linking ISI with email which you probably read about in an indian news paper. Anyways whatever makes you happy but reality is that you people havnt got squat. If i take your word for it you are saying that saying ISI Major sent an email directly to his asset by mentioning that he is an ISI agent along with his name then i can only say all hail your intelligence level.
Oh, believe me, revelation by Headly counts for more than a squat, lot more. Things will never be completely clear unless everything is properly investigated. Pak is neither doing that investigation nor allowing anybody else to do it. Any evidence external to pak (like in the case of headly) is "easily manufactured", even the confessions of countless people with details that can only be further investigated by or with help of place where crime/conspiracy is committed (ie, pak). So, we can take horse up to water, but can't make it drink. That it needs to do on its own. In case of pakistan though, it is refusing to drink and then accusing others of not giving sufficient water...
 
.
Both are leaders of terror outfits which claim attacks on civilians and government on regular basis so do you still need deceleration?

Of course the declaration's needed...If they indeed were deemed terrorists then they wouldnt have found residence in those countries.
 
.
Oh, believe me, revelation by Headly counts for more than a squat, lot more. Things will never be completely clear unless everything is properly investigated. Pak is neither doing that investigation nor allowing anybody else to do it. Any evidence external to pak (like in the case of headly) is "easily manufactured", even the confessions of countless people with details that can only be further investigated by or with help of place where crime/conspiracy is committed (ie, pak). So, we can take horse up to water, but can't make it drink. That it needs to do on its own. In case of pakistan though, it is refusing to drink and then accusing others of not giving sufficient water...

India didnt allow access after smjhota express incident so you see it is a two way streak.

Of course the declaration's needed...If they indeed were deemed terrorists then they wouldnt have found residence in those countries.

Pakistan recognises them as terorists. Dont know about UK though why they are harbouring him and keep refusing to hand him over.
 
.
India didnt allow access after smjhota express incident so you see it is a two way streak.



Pakistan recognises them as terorists. Dont know about UK though why they are harbouring him and keep refusing to hand him over.

Do you have an extradition treaty with UK...plus pakistan will need to prove to UK that he indeed is a terrorist.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom