Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What will you call the descendants of mughals and arab migrants?
Just goes to show that they were a divided, disunited bunch waiting to be ruled by better men. Your argument doesnt do you any favors, you try to make it sound as if the people of this region were somehow united, a pakistan before 1947. But, you are wrong, they were just warring tribes and families, conquered by better warriors, and united into one entity by force of arms. Other than that, you were just minor tribes.Absolutely wrong statement, Pakistani areas always had their own strong local identities. Our ancestors never called themselves as indians or our local areas as "india" or any crap like that. These are all names given by bloody foreigners not by our own ancestors.
Lol. Still not locals.Simple Pakistani
Simple Pakistani
India is also a "civic nationalist" construct as well typical deflection as usualPakistani is not an ethnicity as Turks or Arabs or Persians/Indians
Look your not talking to a ignorant. "Way of life" is just a joke. So is Islam apparently. Now here is the thing. What way of life. If you can't outline it becomes all things to all men. I believe that is how your supreme court concluded. And Sanathan Dharma is the correct name. Hindu as in meaning understood today is of recent invention.Correct- Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life- Hinduism has been called the oldest religion in the world,. The word Hindu is an exonym, and many practitioners refer to it as Sanātana Dharma, "the eternal dharma", or the "eternal way", beyond human history.
Look your not talking to a ignorant. "Way of life" is just a joke. So is Islam apparently. Now here is the thing. What way of life. If you can't outline it becomes all things to all men. I believe that is how your supreme court concluded. And Sanathan Dharma is the correct name. Hindu as in meaning understood today is of recent invention.
And with regards to India. It is rooted from what is Pakistan. Th Indus. If your from Chennai then you are as far from Indus as a Turk. Finally Romania is not Roman Empire. Even if the name conflates. Non of the India's we have today rooted in the land that gave birth to this name - coterminous Pakistan.
- Indiana ~ US state
- Indians [West] ~ Caribean
- Indonesia ~ formerly called East Indies
- India
- etc
Look your not talking to a ignorant. "Way of life" is just a joke. So is Islam apparently. Now here is the thing. What way of life. If you can't outline it becomes all things to all men. I believe that is how your supreme court concluded. And Sanathan Dharma is the correct name. Hindu as in meaning understood today is of recent invention.
And with regards to India. It is rooted from what is Pakistan. Th Indus. If your from Chennai then you are as far from Indus as a Turk. Finally Romania is not Roman Empire. Even if the name conflates. Non of the India's we have today rooted in the land that gave birth to this name - coterminous Pakistan.
- Indiana ~ US state
- Indians [West] ~ Caribean
- Indonesia ~ formerly called East Indies
- India
- etc
Mutt face neither is a 'Indian'. Is a banana munching Dravidian hanging of a Banyan tree same ethnic group as a dhalkhor Sikh? Or a primitive Munda Abo same as a Gujju wobbling his head. No they are NOT.
Hindustan. हिंदुस्तान .This name has been awarded by Arabs . Interestingly, the religion Hinduism also termed by Arabs. The area inhabited by Hindu called Hindustan.
Even the word India is darogatory term used by west.India. This name given by western country to us like they do with every country ,thing and place. Western world rename everything for their convenience. They named River Sindhu, सिंधु, as Indus and region called India.
Hindustan is a Persian word for India, meaning the place/land of Indus (Hindus).
Just goes to show that they were a divided, disunited bunch waiting to be ruled by better men. Your argument doesnt do you any favors, you try to make it sound as if the people of this region were somehow united, a pakistan before 1947. But, you are wrong, they were just warring tribes and families, conquered by better warriors, and united into one entity by force of arms. Other than that, you were just minor tribes.
United by "bloody foreignors" whose actions, directly or indirectly, resulted in creation of Pakistan. Same goes for india. Much as you would like to harp on about being fiercely independent, you followed different strands of a similar religion.
Lol. Still not locals.