What's new

Why Do Americans Hate Beheadings But Love Drone Killings?

Kompromat

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
40,366
Reaction score
416
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Coleen Rowley - Former FBI Special Agent

Why Do Americans Hate Beheadings But Love Drone Killings?
Posted: 09/28/2014 11:24 pm EDT Updated: 09/29/2014 8:59 am EDT

1920px-MQ-9_Afghanistan_takeoff_1_Oct_07.JPG


The answer lies in human psychology. And probably like the old observation about history, people who refuse to understand human psychology are doomed to be victims of psychological manipulation. How is it that even members of peace groups have now come to support US bombing? One lady framed the issue like this: "I request that we discuss and examine why the videotaped beheading of a human being is understood to be more egregious than the explosion (almost totally invisible to the public) of a human being by a missile or bomb fired from a drone."


There are at least four main reasons that explain why Americans care far more about the beheadings (thus far) of two Americans and one U.K citizen, than they care -- here's the polling -- about the thousands of foreign victims of US drone bombing. Here's how people are likely being manipulated into believing that more US bombing is the answer to such terroristic killings even when almost all military experts have admitted that it won't work and "there's no military solution":

1) "Us versus them" mentality, the group bonding also known as tribalism, nationalism, group elitism, etc. seems partially learned behavior but also hard-wired into humans (like other animals) to enable group survival. The worst, most excessive forms of group bonding are also known as racism. Yet it's an innate part of human psychological makeup to identify most closely with those whom we are close to and with whom we share group affinity, so Americans are always going to care more about Americans/Westerners as opposed to more distant foreigners;

2) The gruesome beheadings were deliberately and dramatically videotaped to ensure that US media brought the scenes into all US living rooms whereas the drone bombings of citizens of foreign countries are almost never filmed nor covered at all by US media. Thus to the majority of Americans, drone killings seem sterile, sanitized and surgical even though drone pilots who see the results up close know differently andsome are even committing suicide.

3) It's apparent that even a large segment of the "peace" community does not understand that US wars and US-orchestrated regime changes indirectly created Islamic State (and other Al Qaeda type terrorist groups) and that US drone (and other aerial) bombing is giving rise to MORE terrorism, rather than working to reduce it. These two articles "How the West Created the Islamic State" and "How ISIS Is Using Us to Get What It Wants" describe the dynamic. As in all wars, the leaders of both sides are opportunistically using each other to empower each other. Robert Greenwald's video (below) puts it most succinctly: "How Perpetual War Fuels Terrorism." (But the opposite is also true: terrorism fuels war). This is well-known by Western intelligence analysts and foreign policy experts, and it's garden variety war manipulation for everyone except the duped US public. (Borowitz isn't really joking when he reports: "Americans Who Have Not Read a Single Article About Syria Strongly Support Bombing It.") It's depressing otherwise to learn how many uninformed people there are that still think "bombing the village to save it" somehow can work. Such "war on terror" propaganda is actually effective on the liberal-minded who are more vulnerable to having their emotional buttons -- fear, hate, greed, false pride and blind loyalty -- pressed than it is on more pragmatic, cool-headed realists. It's being reported that a number of US journalists who should know better have even fallen for hyped terror threats used to justify the launching of bombing upon Syria.

4) A fourth reason why most Americans now go happily along with perpetual war in a kind of blissful stupor, cheering on their favorite war hawk politician comes from the lessons learned so well from the Vietnam War. Getting rid of the military draft and putting the trillions of dollars of mounting war costs on the ever-expanding and perfectly elastic national debt card was a stroke of genius on the part of the military industrial complex to wipe away any remaining "Vietnam Syndrome." The new "poverty draft" that we're left with constitutes another layer of "us versus them" type manipulation geared to getting the liberal, intellectual middle class on board as they perceive little or no costs and only benefits to perpetual war. Even when not directly profiting by working for military or national security contractors, many Americans have come to believe war creates jobs and ensures they are supplied with cheap gas and other resources.

Anyway, I may be flat wrong but there has to be some explanation and I would welcome others' opinions. Without the witty humor of a Borowitz or Jon Stewart, people may also resent being told how they are constantly duped into this perpetual war that makes them less and less safe. But hopefully, more people will wise up to this psychological manipulation.

Why Do Americans Hate Beheadings But Love Drone Killings? | Coleen Rowley
 
. . . .
Only if a terrorist beheading an innocent and drone bombing terrorist are same!!

According to comprehensive studies carried out on America's drone strikes, 100% of Obama's targets were Muslims, 88% of whom were non combatants aka innocent civilians. 268 kids were killed in Pakistan alone till 2012.

People like you are either utterly ignorant about the facts or too Islamophobic to see the reality.
 
.
Drone strikes are illegal under internal laws. Drones strikes gives unlimited power to the American nerd sitting in his control room to be the judge, the jury and the executioner. I thought USA's purpose was to ''gift'' democracy to the world?
 
.
According to comprehensive studies carried out on America's drone strikes, 100% of Obama's targets were Muslims, 88% of whom were non combatants aka innocent civilians. 268 kids were killed in Pakistan alone till 2012.

People like you are either utterly ignorant about the facts or too Islamophobic to see the reality.

Can you please post up the links to these studies that you mention? Thanks.
 
. .
Drone strikes are illegal under internal laws. Drones strikes gives unlimited power to the American nerd sitting in his control room to be the judge, the jury and the executioner. I thought USA's purpose was to ''gift'' democracy to the world?
america has no purpose other then to be itself... it is not the worlds "freedom giver" or "police officer" its just a country and it should just act like one...
 
.
According to comprehensive studies carried out on America's drone strikes, 100% of Obama's targets were Muslims, 88% of whom were non combatants aka innocent civilians. 268 kids were killed in Pakistan alone till 2012.

People like you are either utterly ignorant about the facts or too Islamophobic to see the reality.

Still Pakistan is said to be in hand in hand with US in these drone strike on its own people as claim by people like you to save the face.

So drone strikes are breach of pakistan sovereignty?
 
.
According to comprehensive studies carried out on America's drone strikes, 100% of Obama's targets were Muslims, 88% of whom were non combatants aka innocent civilians. 268 kids were killed in Pakistan alone till 2012.

People like you are either utterly ignorant about the facts or too Islamophobic to see the reality.

What are the statistics of Zarb e Azb?
 
.
because they like to blow peoples in to pieces ... this is what they are doing since WW2 ...
 
. .
What are the statistics of Zarb e Azb?

PAF uses F-16s. Hence, its actually American machines doing it. And how dare you compare a humanitarian operation of talking to few disgruntled ex-Talibs who btw were trained by the same Army which is now trying to re-train them to a crusade by the Americans against the whole Muslim Ummah (Read Pakistan since they are the only chaps talking about Ummah). Americans do it, CRUSADE! PA does it KOSHER!
 
.
The death of innocent people is always tragic. Perhaps the bigger question here is why more people in the world in general, with the exception of certain factions, have a bigger problem with beheadings than drone attacks. The answer to that might lie in the fact that while the drone operator is targeting specific people and the innocents are collateral deaths, a beheading is quite personal and in most cases, it is a non-combatant who is being made an example for others to see. A drone does not fire at schools just to put fear in the hearts of the inhabitants of the area. A recorded beheading, on the other hand, is deliberately stage-managed to instill fear. It has no other value.

Before a beheading occurs, the victim is known to the perpetrator. So the question to be asked is, if the people in charge of the drone strike knew beforehand that the person they are about to strike is a non-combatant, would they still go through with the strike? That answer is obviously no to everyone other than a very select group of people.

Finally, if there were graphic videos of U.S military personnel beheading non-combatants, there would be even more outrage in the U.S. than there is for ISIS beheadings. The men responsible would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. There would be no excuses made for the perpetrators.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom