Why China denied Philipines ' suggestion to ITCLOS ?

[Vietnam.Duong]

Dear Chinese members,

Pls clear us know the reason why your leader denied Philipines ' suggestion to ITLOS ?

Because you do not have enough evidences for this right ?

Regards
Vietnam.Duong

 

[Martian2]

Dear Chinese members,

Pls clear us know the reason why your leader denied Philipines ' suggestion to ITCLOS ?

Because you do not have enough evidences for this right ?

Regards
Vietnam.Duong

This is a bilateral issue. Russia did not go to ITCLOS in its dispute with Georgia. Neither did the United States in its dispute with Saddam Hussein or with the Taliban. ITCLOS is for weak countries outside of the P-5.

 

[S10]

Why are Viets opening threads that has nothing to do with military to spread their stupidity?

 

[ChineseRobinHood]

This is a bilateral issue. Russia did not go to ITCLOS in its dispute with Georgia. Neither did the United States in its dispute with Saddam Hussein or with the Taliban. ITCLOS is for weak countries outside of the P-5.

That's completely right!!! If Nazi German existed today, they would also do as we SuperPower and Great China did!!! Long Live Great China!!!

 

[ao333]

Dear Chinese members,

Pls clear us know the reason why your leader denied Philipines ' suggestion to ITCLOS ?

Because you do not have enough evidences for this right ?

Regards
Vietnam.Duong

You mean UNCLOS? Which suggestion? Source?

Clearify

In any case, Russia will always own the Kurils and the Brits still rule Falklands.

Evidence? 2nd and 3rd largest navies in the world.

 

[Vietnam.Duong]

This is a bilateral issue. Russia did not go to ITCLOS in its dispute with Georgia. Neither did the United States in its dispute with Saddam Hussein or with the Taliban. ITCLOS is for weak countries outside of the P-5.

Pls let me know evidence for Russia ang Georgia ? US and Saddam, you should check again.....

---------- Post added at 02:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:15 PM ----------

This is a bilateral issue. Russia did not go to ITCLOS in its dispute with Georgia. Neither did the United States in its dispute with Saddam Hussein or with the Taliban. ITCLOS is for weak countries outside of the P-5.

Pls let me know evidence for Russia ang Georgia ? US and Saddam, you should check again.....

---------- Post added at 02:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:15 PM ----------

Why are Viets opening threads that has nothing to do with military to spread their stupidity?

You dare not face the truth ?

 

[Vietnam.Duong]

That's completely right!!! If Nazi German existed today, they would also do as we SuperPower and Great China did!!! Long Live Great China!!!

How much money Chinese give you for this answer ?, this is not answer for this thread.

 

[ChineseRobinHood]

You mean UNCLOS? Which suggestion? Source?

Clearify

In any case, Russia will always own the Kurils and the Brits still rule Falklands.

Evidence? 2nd and 3rd largest navies in the world.

Excellent! Even God can't say better! This poor forum isn't for any debates and disputes and morals and international law and any stupid and foolish and rubbish things at all!!! This poor Pakistani forum is only for us Super Chinese to show off and advertise our SuperPower Weapons of God's Son to take money!!! If we talk about some kinds of stupid justice here, that's only because we want to prove that we can speak and understand human languages and can type on a keyboard and can use Internet just for fun. Don't you poor and little Vietnamese and Pakistani guys understand?

 

[Vietnam.Duong]

You mean UNCLOS? Which suggestion? Source?

Clearify

In any case, Russia will always own the Kurils and the Brits still rule Falklands.

Evidence? 2nd and 3rd largest navies in the world.

You are Canadian and living in Canada, but your understanding is very low, UNCLOS and ITCLOS are different. As you understand it then answer my question ?

 

[Cambodia Spirit]

That's completely right!!! If Nazi German existed today, they would also do as we SuperPower and Great China did!!! Long Live Great China!!!

Excellent! Even God can't say better! This poor forum isn't for any debates and disputes and morals and international law and any stupid and foolish and rubbish things at all!!! This poor Pakistani forum is only for us Super Chinese to show off and advertise our SuperPower Weapons of God's Son to take money!!! If we talk about some kinds of stupid justice here, that's only because we want to prove that we can speak and understand human languages and can type on a keyboard and can use Internet just for fun. Don't you poor and little Vietnamese and Pakistani guys understand?

This ID is absolutely a troll, mods where are you!?

 

[NiceGuy]

You are Canadian and living in Canada, but your understanding is very low, UNCLOS and ITCLOS are different. As you understand it then answer my question ?

Hey bro, this is military forum, your thread have nothing related to military.Expain what is UNCLOS and ITCLOS first, dumb a@@

 

[akittya]

This ID is absolutely a troll, mods where are you!?

ChineseRobinHood
This Vietnamese have more than one ID,and all ID is posing Chinese ,already has long been notorious

Pls clear us know the reason why your leader denied Philipines ' suggestion to ITCLOS ?

why?
Very simple, generally there are three ways to resolve disputes
1, negotiations
2, International Arbitration
3, War
use international arbitration is not mandatory.
If choose International arbitration we have 99.99999% chance take back these two islands（why not 100%?Because in reality can not absolutely prevent Wronged Case.） , but if choose other two, we have 100% chance to take back these two islands.
Why they want suggestion to ITCLOS,Because the was looking forward to Wronged Case. So they have 0.00001% chance get these island.

 

[Vietnam.Duong]

Hey bro, this is military forum, your thread have nothing related to military.Expain what is UNCLOS and ITCLOS first, dumb a@@

I think that many men know it, but just except many Chinese, UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea), ITLOS (International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea)

 

[Cambodia Spirit]

Excellent! Even God can't say better! This poor forum isn't for any debates and disputes and morals and international law and any stupid and foolish and rubbish things at all!!! This poor Pakistani forum is only for us Super Chinese to show off and advertise our SuperPower Weapons of God's Son to take money!!! If we talk about some kinds of stupid justice here, that's only because we want to prove that we can speak and understand human languages and can type on a keyboard and can use Internet just for fun. Don't you poor and little Vietnamese and Pakistani guys understand?

That's completely right!!! If Nazi German existed today, they would also do as we SuperPower and Great China did!!! Long Live Great China!!!

Cheap comedy!!!

 

[peaceful]

I think that many men know it, but just except many Chinese, UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea), ITLOS (International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea)

I think we two need to go to the court so you can prove to the court that you are not pig.