My dear friend,
Downplaying my knowledge and questioning my reason-ability is not gonna help you tackle the questions. Now i would like to ask you something out of your own points.
1. Only Pakistan was supposed to withdraw it's troop and non-state assets from J&K, India was supposed to minimize it's force just enough to maintain civil administration and law & order, not completely withdraw. If you do not believe me, Please refer to UNSC reolution on Wikipedia or any other credible source other than Pakistani source. And hence Pakistan did not follow that resolution that time and waited to change the demographic in it's favor, It has no right to ask of it now.
And after that a comission was to be formed to overlook the fairness of plebiscite which would have contained members from internation community as well as Indian and Pakistani. So your objection to fairness of plebiscite in presence of minimized Indian force is not credible.
2. Let me tell you how free the government of so called AJK is.
The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council is a supreme body consisting of 11 members, six from the government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and five from the government of Pakistan. Its chairman/chief executive is the president of Pakistan. Other members of the council are the president and the prime minister of Azad Kashmir. You see that, out of 11 members, 5 are pakistani and 1 is Pakistan's president. As far as others are concerned, only those people are allowed to contest in election there who are pro-Pakistani. election candidates are prescreened to ensure that only those who support Kashmir?s union with Pakistan can contest elections. Anyone who wants to take part in public life in Azad Kashmir has to sign a pledge of loyalty to Pakistan, while anyone who publicly supports or peacefully works for an independent Kashmir faces persecution. There is a façade of an elected local government, but the federal government in Islamabad, the army and the intelligence agencies control all aspects of political life in Azad Kashmir.The military shows no tolerance for dissent and practically runs the region as a fiefdom. See how free the govt in Azad Kashmir is?
3. Please explain me how this works? After when Kashmir issue is solved, Pakistan govt will talk with china about ceded territory? What does it mean? When will Pakistan talk with China? Before or After Plebiscite? IF before, Then why did they ceded that area in the first place? IF after, then what about people of that area? will they take part in plebiscite or not? I do not think so. China is not going to give you back what you have gifted them.
BTW what was your right to give it to them in the first place? You say Kashmir is of Kashmiris, and still you gift wrap a part of territory to China, ithout asking anybody? It is such a hypocrisy.
4. Point 4 was a question, not argument
5. How would that happen? when did Chinese say that? Is that their official stand? last i checked they claim it their integral territory as part of Xinjiang province ( or whatever that place is called).
6. Most Importantly you have not answered the most important question which is point no. 2. in my discussion. How do you guarantee the originality of native Kashmiri in Azad Kashmir.
Did you even read the article i posted, as why it is not possible?
Do you have any reason or logical explanation to support your statement?
I think just having "K" word in name Pakistan which was supposed to be "K" of Kashmir, gives an identity crisis to Pakistani people. They know that whole of J&K is not in Pakistan, so they are confused whether to continue with word K in Pakistan or drop it. That is the reason behind identity crisis in Pakistan. Tell me what happens if Kashmir gets independent in plebiscite, will Pakistan drop "K" out of Pakistan , because i think that was the idea behind naming Pakistan in 1930's
