Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
only nukes attack on japan is 100% proove that usa is terarrst state.they can kill thusents of inocents japanes .
Who are terrorists?
- Thread starter ajpirzada
- Start date
TruthSeeker
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
- Messages
- 6,390
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
See, the above ^^^^^ proves my point. This thread is not only BS, it is flaming BS. 
Kaffir, kaffer or kafir, which once was a blanket term for black southern Africans (see Kaffir (historical usage in southern Africa)), is now utilized exclusively as an ethnic or racial slur. The original meaning of the word was 'heathen', unbeliever or infidel, from the Arabic Kafir.[1] Portuguese explorers used the term generally to describe tribes they encountered in southern Africa, probably having misunderstood its etymology from Muslim traders along the coast. European colonists subsequently continued its use.[2] Although used often inoffensively between the 16th and 19th centuries, as racial tensions increased in 20th century South Africa, its use became more racially slanderous than just a general word to describe a race of people.
Kaffir, kaffer or kafir, which once was a blanket term for black southern Africans (see Kaffir (historical usage in southern Africa)), is now utilized exclusively as an ethnic or racial slur. The original meaning of the word was 'heathen', unbeliever or infidel, from the Arabic Kafir.[1] Portuguese explorers used the term generally to describe tribes they encountered in southern Africa, probably having misunderstood its etymology from Muslim traders along the coast. European colonists subsequently continued its use.[2] Although used often inoffensively between the 16th and 19th centuries, as racial tensions increased in 20th century South Africa, its use became more racially slanderous than just a general word to describe a race of people.
Luftwaffe
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2008
- Messages
- 9,544
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Son You can't handle the Truth....Sura 8:57 So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
Its the prophecy will be fulfilled Kafirs are bound to die and rest in hell. Good lucky hope i cleared my point loud and clear.
TruthSeeker
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
- Messages
- 6,390
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Luftwaffe
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2008
- Messages
- 9,544
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Yeah indeed hilarious when kafirs are running all over looking for places to hiding ...i'm laughing @ you now thanks for making me laugh @ you 
we need a joker on this forum.
remember>>>prophecy to be fulfilled..just don't run away ok?
we need a joker on this forum.
remember>>>prophecy to be fulfilled..just don't run away ok?
Luftwaffe
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2008
- Messages
- 9,544
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Son...if you are rejecting the 10 commandments of ur bible its not my problem your God said don't kill you kill, your god said don't rape you do that, u ppl have rejected ur own faith and ur babbling and ranting over here about reasoning? well well lil boy what is it that you have that you think you can prove your self on the right path...
Kharian_Beast
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,645
- Reaction score
- 0
Yaar is ghadde kisaat bak bak karna fazool hay.
SherdiL!
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2008
- Messages
- 290
- Reaction score
- 0
estimated of 2.5 muillions Muslims are killed in Iraq and Afganistan.Israel uses chemical weapon in "2000" against Palestine its not a war against terror its a war against Muslims.US imperlist policies against small countries like south-korea,phillipines,hawaii and peuto rico and many more...next is Pakistan,Iran than china
ajpirzada
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2008
- Messages
- 6,011
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
lets stop blamin each other on the basis of religion. its not as if muslims have never commited any terrorism. many have been involved in killing innocent ppl. we need to define who terrorists are.
i often here ppl sayin if muslims are not terrorists then y terrorists are always muslims. this arguement is not true. ppl who say this are only those who listen to everyday news and dont use their mind.
muslims are not organised and lack leadership and therefore when someone does anything horrible to them, they get forced towards taking revenge. this is bec they know there gov is incapable and also lacks the will to raise its voice against the west. however non muslims are more organised and therefore their individuals dont need to do anything as their state is capable of doin anything.
so non muslims are more involved in state sponsered terrorism whereas muslims carry out individual terrorism. now bec state sponsered terrorism is more organised therefore it doesnt get pointed out. individual terrorism is not organised thus attrats everyones attention.
wat makes muslim world get frustrated is y is no one condemning state sponsered terrorism and only showing terrorists as muslims. y only condemn london bombing, mumbai attacks, 9/11, marriot bombing and not condemn state sponsered terrorism which is being carried out by israel in palestine, by US in both iraq and afghanistan, and by india in kashmir.
for my non muslim brothers. guys plz dont get offended when someone uses the word kafir. muslims have always been using this word for last 1400yrs for non muslims. its a more general term for anyone who is not muslim. i dont know when and y was it used in africa. its an arabic word and has to do nothing with africa.
to my muslim brothers plz dont offend anyone if u r truely muslim. that line which was quoted from the Holy Quran, that was revealed during war time. therefore before analysin any verse from Quran we need to study the timing and reason behind that and not just pick it up and apply to everyone at all times. thats where most of us muslims are goin wrong. we read a verse and then start jumping without understanding its context. we are only creating a negative image of our religion by doin this. also we have been told not to say bad about anyones religion so that no one says bad about ours. lets discuss this issue in harmony.
regards
i often here ppl sayin if muslims are not terrorists then y terrorists are always muslims. this arguement is not true. ppl who say this are only those who listen to everyday news and dont use their mind.
muslims are not organised and lack leadership and therefore when someone does anything horrible to them, they get forced towards taking revenge. this is bec they know there gov is incapable and also lacks the will to raise its voice against the west. however non muslims are more organised and therefore their individuals dont need to do anything as their state is capable of doin anything.
so non muslims are more involved in state sponsered terrorism whereas muslims carry out individual terrorism. now bec state sponsered terrorism is more organised therefore it doesnt get pointed out. individual terrorism is not organised thus attrats everyones attention.
wat makes muslim world get frustrated is y is no one condemning state sponsered terrorism and only showing terrorists as muslims. y only condemn london bombing, mumbai attacks, 9/11, marriot bombing and not condemn state sponsered terrorism which is being carried out by israel in palestine, by US in both iraq and afghanistan, and by india in kashmir.
for my non muslim brothers. guys plz dont get offended when someone uses the word kafir. muslims have always been using this word for last 1400yrs for non muslims. its a more general term for anyone who is not muslim. i dont know when and y was it used in africa. its an arabic word and has to do nothing with africa.
to my muslim brothers plz dont offend anyone if u r truely muslim. that line which was quoted from the Holy Quran, that was revealed during war time. therefore before analysin any verse from Quran we need to study the timing and reason behind that and not just pick it up and apply to everyone at all times. thats where most of us muslims are goin wrong. we read a verse and then start jumping without understanding its context. we are only creating a negative image of our religion by doin this. also we have been told not to say bad about anyones religion so that no one says bad about ours. lets discuss this issue in harmony.
regards
TruthSeeker
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
- Messages
- 6,390
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
From Wikipedia:
Terrorism is the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion. There is no internationally agreed definition of terrorism. Most common definitions of terrorism include only those acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants.
Some definitions also include acts of unlawful violence and war. The history of terrorist organizations suggests that they do not select terrorism for its political effectiveness. Individual terrorists tend to be motivated more by a desire for social solidarity with other members of their organization than by political platforms or strategic objectives, which are often murky and undefined. The word "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged, and this greatly compounds the difficulty of providing a precise definition. One 1988 study by the US Army found that over 100 definitions of the word "terrorism" have been used. A person who practices terrorism is a terrorist. The concept of terrorism is itself controversial because it is often used by states to delegitimize political opponents, and thus legitimize the state's own use of terror against those opponents.
Terrorism has been used by a broad array of political organizations in furthering their objectives; both right-wing and left-wing political parties, nationalistic, and religious groups, revolutionaries and ruling governments. The presence of non-state actors in widespread armed conflict has created controversy regarding the application of the laws of war.
While acts of terrorism are criminal acts as per the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 and domestic jurisprudence of almost all countries in the world, terrorism refers to a phenomenon including the actual acts, the perpetrators of acts of terrorism themselves and their motives. There is disagreement on definitions of terrorism.
Terrorism is the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion. There is no internationally agreed definition of terrorism. Most common definitions of terrorism include only those acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants.
Some definitions also include acts of unlawful violence and war. The history of terrorist organizations suggests that they do not select terrorism for its political effectiveness. Individual terrorists tend to be motivated more by a desire for social solidarity with other members of their organization than by political platforms or strategic objectives, which are often murky and undefined. The word "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged, and this greatly compounds the difficulty of providing a precise definition. One 1988 study by the US Army found that over 100 definitions of the word "terrorism" have been used. A person who practices terrorism is a terrorist. The concept of terrorism is itself controversial because it is often used by states to delegitimize political opponents, and thus legitimize the state's own use of terror against those opponents.
Terrorism has been used by a broad array of political organizations in furthering their objectives; both right-wing and left-wing political parties, nationalistic, and religious groups, revolutionaries and ruling governments. The presence of non-state actors in widespread armed conflict has created controversy regarding the application of the laws of war.
While acts of terrorism are criminal acts as per the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 and domestic jurisprudence of almost all countries in the world, terrorism refers to a phenomenon including the actual acts, the perpetrators of acts of terrorism themselves and their motives. There is disagreement on definitions of terrorism.
Similar threads
