What's new

While US Keep Failing with Their Hypersonic Missile, China Already Successful Test Their Hybrid Rocket-Scramjet [RBCC] Today !!

. . .
But we have tested it in the USA before, in 1950/1951.

We also tested Britain in 1949, France in 1950, India in 1962 and the Soviet Union in 1969.

The test results were good. We all won.



Don't you think it's ridiculous for you to threaten the Chinese people with Iraq and other countries?

Why don't you listen to our threats:

In the 13th century BC, GuiFang were stronger than us, and then we killed them all.

In 200 BC, the Huns were stronger than us, and then we killed them all.

In 430 BC, Xianbei was stronger than us, and then we killed them all.

In AD 500, Rouran was stronger than us, and then we killed them all.

In AD 600, Tujue were stronger than us, and then we killed them all.

In AD 800, Huihe was stronger than us, and then we killed them all.

……
You think I was threatening? I was merely warning to take the US's failures at your own peril. US is and will remain the financial and military super power for some time to come. In the Air, under water, on Land and perhaps even in the space, there is no power that can take on the US military might and come out victorious. It is vain to consider that Chinese products would be superior to the US military products and I say this because the US always keeps an ace up the sleeve which it shows only when it wants to.
 
.
You think I was threatening? I was merely warning to take the US's failures at your own peril. US is and will remain the financial and military super power for some time to come. In the Air, under water, on Land and perhaps even in the space, there is no power that can take on the US military might and come out victorious. It is vain to consider that Chinese products would be superior to the US military products and I say this because the US always keeps an ace up the sleeve which it shows only when it wants to.
Are you joking? The US can't even beat Afghan farmers with AK-47. How the hell are they going to win a war against superpower China which has cutting edge tech weapons.

US has no advantage in fighting China, China's A2/AD will ensure no hostile military assets from enemy can get through 1st island chain during military conflict let alone invade China.

Current US pacific fleet are no to PLA, therefore US will not win a war in China's backyard.
 
.
Are you joking? The US can't even beat Afghan farmers with AK-47. How the hell are they going to win a war against superpower China which has cutting edge tech weapons.

US has no advantage in fighting China, China's A2/AD will ensure no hostile military assets from enemy can get through 1st island chain during military conflict let alone invade China.

Current US pacific fleet are no to PLA, therefore US will not win a war in China's backyard.
Depends on what you mean by beating; the US annihilated Afghan infrastructure and ruled for 20 years through their proxy and with a mere 10,000 force at the end. Talibaan won because the American people wanted America to end its war and not because America was beaten.

You want to believe that the Chinese A2/D2 will be able to not only detect but also take out American F-22's, B-2's and their yet to be revealed 6th Gen Bomber/Fighter AC etc., I think it is easier said than done. The Americans not have have the most battle tested equipment in the world, they also have a deeper understanding of military tactics then the world combined. This is a nation which won its freedom through sheer will and determination, fought a civil war within to emerge even stronger and defeated the super powers of World War 1 and 2. This is a country which has changed the course of history and countries in the last 100 years and which is far ahead of others in terms of Military Technology.

Just an example, our decades old P3C Orions pick out Chinese & Indian subs despite being decades old. This is outdated technology to what the US holds and uses. And most of the cutting edge technology of the US is highly classified; hell, certain specifications and parameters of even the F-35 are are highly classified let alone the F-22 and the F-XX (6th Gen US Fighter/Bomber).

The US would not win any war with China on Chinese soil with boots on ground but anywhere else, be it in the ocean, in the air or in the space.....I have my bet on the Americans!
 
.
Depends on what you mean by beating; the US annihilated Afghan infrastructure and ruled for 20 years through their proxy and with a mere 10,000 force at the end. Talibaan won because the American people wanted America to end its war and not because America was beaten.

You want to believe that the Chinese A2/D2 will be able to not only detect but also take out American F-22's, B-2's and their yet to be revealed 6th Gen Bomber/Fighter AC etc., I think it is easier said than done. The Americans not have have the most battle tested equipment in the world, they also have a deeper understanding of military tactics then the world combined. This is a nation which won its freedom through sheer will and determination, fought a civil war within to emerge even stronger and defeated the super powers of World War 1 and 2. This is a country which has changed the course of history and countries in the last 100 years and which is far ahead of others in terms of Military Technology.

Just an example, our decades old P3C Orions pick out Chinese & Indian subs despite being decades old. This is outdated technology to what the US holds and uses. And most of the cutting edge technology of the US is highly classified; hell, certain specifications and parameters of even the F-35 are are highly classified let alone the F-22 and the F-XX (6th Gen US Fighter/Bomber).

The US would not win any war with China on Chinese soil with boots on ground but anywhere else, be it in the ocean, in the air or in the space.....I have my bet on the Americans!
We can do this:
1. Increase the number of N-weapons to 3000 to deter some crazy people from taking military risks.
2. Doubling the Chinese Navy. Drag the USA into the naval arms race.
The Chinese Navy will be to 8 heavy aircraft carriers + 8*075 + 8*076,
24*055 (055a),
72*052c / D / E,
80*054A / B and 100*056

China's shipbuilding capacity is 30 times that of the USA(per year 12 million tons:0.4 million tons)

The cost of shipbuilding in China is less than half that in the USA
055's cost is $0.9 billion.
Burke's cost $2.58 billion.

How does the USA respond to this situation?
Relinquish control of the sea?Or double the military spending? 10% GDP,like the Soviet Union.
 
.
Depends on what you mean by beating; the US annihilated Afghan infrastructure and ruled for 20 years through their proxy and with a mere 10,000 force at the end. Talibaan won because the American people wanted America to end its war and not because America was beaten.

You want to believe that the Chinese A2/D2 will be able to not only detect but also take out American F-22's, B-2's and their yet to be revealed 6th Gen Bomber/Fighter AC etc., I think it is easier said than done. The Americans not have have the most battle tested equipment in the world, they also have a deeper understanding of military tactics then the world combined. This is a nation which won its freedom through sheer will and determination, fought a civil war within to emerge even stronger and defeated the super powers of World War 1 and 2. This is a country which has changed the course of history and countries in the last 100 years and which is far ahead of others in terms of Military Technology.

Just an example, our decades old P3C Orions pick out Chinese & Indian subs despite being decades old. This is outdated technology to what the US holds and uses. And most of the cutting edge technology of the US is highly classified; hell, certain specifications and parameters of even the F-35 are are highly classified let alone the F-22 and the F-XX (6th Gen US Fighter/Bomber).

The US would not win any war with China on Chinese soil with boots on ground but anywhere else, be it in the ocean, in the air or in the space.....I have my bet on the Americans!
US didn't win the WW I, it just gave the final push as the two sides were dead stalemated. Same goes to WW II, US didn't win that war either, USSR did the most difficult and bulk of the fighting in Europe. US didn't win any war against the superpower USSR in the cold war either, the USSR just gave up in the end without firing a shot.
 
.
We can do this:
1. Increase the number of N-weapons to 3000 to deter some crazy people from taking military risks.
2. Doubling the Chinese Navy. Drag the USA into the naval arms race.
The Chinese Navy will be to 8 heavy aircraft carriers + 8*075 + 8*076,
24*055 (055a),
72*052c / D / E,
80*054A / B and 100*056

China's shipbuilding capacity is 30 times that of the USA(per year 12 million tons:0.4 million tons)

The cost of shipbuilding in China is less than half that in the USA
055's cost is $0.9 billion.
Burke's cost $2.58 billion.

How does the USA respond to this situation?
Relinquish control of the sea?Or double the military spending? 10% GDP,like the Soviet Union.
3000 nuclear war heads are needed to take care both US and NATO now as they pretty much view China as an enemy. 350 plus N warheads possessed by China as widely publicly believed by the US military now is definitely not enough. A 4 star US general stated few years ago that Chinese N weapons can kill at most 30 millions Americans in war time and I don't know if he is being arrogant as many Americans are. If he is correct, it means the Chinese nuclear delivery system has only about 10% penetration of US shield. The decision makers in China must realize that thousands of nuclear warheads and missiles are needed to have the ultimate credible deterrent against the war monger American adventures.
 
. . .

China Testing New Horrifying Hypersonic Missile with Transforming Engine​


CHINA has successfully demonstrated the potential of its new "Feitian-1" hypersonic missile, which features a transforming engine that can switch between different configurations.


Hypersonic objects travel in excess of five times the speed of sound, or 3,806mph, fast enough to fly from London to New York in less than an hour. For missiles — such as those recently deployed by Russia against Ukraine or those being tested by the US, achieving such velocities can allow them to evade present-day air defences and anti-ballistic missile systems.

It also makes them better able to penetrate heavily shielded structures and capable of destroying targets by means of kinetic energy alone, without even factoring in a payload of high explosives.

The Feitian-1 design — whose name translates to “flying sky”, was launched from a base in north-western China on Monday.

Developed by experts from the Northwestern Polytechnical University, the rocket is believed to operate on a so-called waverider design, generating lift from the shockwaves it produced when flying at many times the speed of sound.

According to Overdefense.com, the Feitian-1 appears to sport the first-ever operational kerosene combined cycle ramjet/rocket engine capable of smooth transitions between at least four different propulsion configurations.

This, it is said, should allow it to operate efficiently during every phase of flight - and means it represents a breakthrough for Chinese hypersonic aircraft designs.

Conventional, “air-breathing” jet engines like those seen in large passenger aircraft actively draw in and compress oxygen to allow them to burn fuel as they fly — for example, through rotating fan blades.

Above three times the speed of sound, however, this becomes unnecessary, as the passage of the jet or weapon through the air achieves this by itself.

So-called ramjet and scramjet engines that take advantage of this principle can achieve levels of fuel efficiency that, for comparison, rockets can not.

Accordingly, the Feitian-1 is more lightweight than current boost-glide weapons systems like the US Air Force’s AGM-183 ARRW, Overdefense.com report.

This will allow the rocket to carry either more fuel, thereby increasing its range, or a larger payload.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scie...1-hypersonic-missile-with-transforming-engine
I suspect many of those Chinese engineers working for space x will go back to China one day, adding to the knowledge pool everything they learned at space x.
 
.
US didn't win the WW I, it just gave the final push as the two sides were dead stalemated. Same goes to WW II, US didn't win that war either, USSR did the most difficult and bulk of the fighting in Europe. US didn't win any war against the superpower USSR in the cold war either, the USSR just gave up in the end without firing a shot.
You are being unfair with those statements. The US was the deciding factor in both World Wars. And the US crushed the Soviet Union without firing a bullet, just by engaging the Soviet Union in an endless pursuit of weapons and finally by bogging them down in Afghanistan; that is another massive achievement you conveniently ignored.

And you are also ignoring the American superiority in conventional weapon and defense systems which is leaps and bounds ahead of the world. The Americans create trends which the rest follow and they keep leading and developing with the world trailing behind. The Drone is just a very recent example of something which the Americans created and which is now being used by almost every affording country of the world!
 
.
So did China. Did not Sun Tzu said that is the best way to win?
No, you obviously don't understand China's strategy enough.

The Chinese do advocate "winning without fighting". But China's strategy also warns that "兔死狗烹" (if the rabbits die, then the next turn is the Beagle), and the strategy "养贼自重" (don't kill all the enemies, leave some, and make you more important).

According to the analysis of Chinese think tanks, the result most in line with the interests of the USA is to significantly weaken the Soviet Union, but not let the Soviet Union collapse.

If the Soviet Union continues to exist, China and the EU will inevitably continue to unite under the banner of the USA and will not begin to challenge the status of the USA.

But Chinese think tanks have also analyzed it. A country like the USA cannot use such a long-term strategy. Because your ruling party will definitely choose to destroy the Soviet Union to obtain short-term interests and party prestige.
The power structure of the USA determines that the policy of the USA govt must be short-sighted.
 
Last edited:
.
While US still struggle with their keep failing Hypersonic Missile

China already put in service their Hypersonic one since 2017 (5 years ago)
China-Missile-DF-17-Parade.jpg








From last year. China also Have FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment System). Literally, a Hypersonic Strategic Bomber from Space that can Bomb any point on Earth, untouchable with any SAM system :enjoy:
https___d6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net_prod_735d5850-30f9-11ec-ad7e-8592eb5970ca-standard-1.png
FCUC-MjWUAMVz6i

tengyun-2018-image01.jpg








China don't Stop there, they keep Moving Forward.
Today, they already Successfully Test Hybrid Rocket-Scramjet RBCC (Rocket Based Combined-Cycle) :o:
FW3td55VQAATaFf



The US conducted another successful test of its air launched ARRW hypersonic boost glide missile this week.

 
.
Back
Top Bottom