When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims

[selvan33]

When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims: Boston bombing suspect

NEW YORK: Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev wrote a note before his capture in which he called the victims "collateral damage" for US action in Afghanistan and Iraq, local media reported on Thursday.

"When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims," Tsarnaev also scribbled on the inside wall of the boat where he hid from police during a massive manhunt in the days after the April 15 blasts, according to CBS News.

The twin explosions near the finish line of the Boston Marathon killed three people and wounded more than 260.

Citing unnamed sources, CBS News said the note claimed the bombings were payback for US military action in Afghanistan and Iraq and referred to the victims as "collateral damage."

Dzhokhar also said he did not mourn the death of his older brother Tamerlan, killed in a shootout with police, saying he was a martyr, the broadcaster said.

Federal prosecutors have charged Dzhokhar with using and conspiring to use a weapon of mass destruction, as well as the malicious destruction of property by means of deadly explosives.

He faces the death penalty if found guilty.

The case also allegedly involves three young students — two Kazakhs and an Ethiopian-American.

The Kazakhs — Dias Kadyrbayev and Azamat Tazhayakov — are being held on charges of covering up for the suspected Boston marathon bombers

According to prosecutors, the two went to Dzhokhar's dorm room at the University of Massachusetts — where they were all studying — and took his backpack and laptop and threw them away.

A third friend of the younger Tsarnaev, Robel Phillipos, was accused of lying to investigators after the blasts. He was ordered free on $100,000 bail May 6 as he awaits trial.

A lawyer for Tazhayakov said his client denies the charges against him.

"As far as where the case is going, the government alleges that my client gave consent for another defendant, Kadyrbayev, to enter the dorm room, which somehow created a conspiracy," Arkady Bukh said.

"We are trying to get more evidence in order to intelligently assess the case. At this time, my client is denying any involvement in the crime."

A hearing scheduled for the two Kazakhs was canceled on Tuesday to give the parties more time to prepare.

When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims: Boston bombing suspect - The Times of India

 

[Langda Tyaagi]

What a logic. Does that mean that if one Muslim is a terrorist then all the Muslims are same?

 

[Parul]

Brain Damaged (washed)

 

[Spring Onion]

What a logic. Does that mean that if one Muslim is a terrorist then all the Muslims are same?

two different things.

being a victim and being an attacker two different things.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

two different things.

being a victim and being an attacker two different things.

You can not twist the logic to suit your dialog now ...can you....or should you???

If attack on One Muslim is attack on all Muslims... then attack by one Muslim is attack by all Muslims.

 

[Langda Tyaagi]

two different things.

being a victim and being an attacker two different things.

In fact it should be the opposite.
The Muslims of one country should not bother about the Muslims of another country. They should not poke their nose on religious basis. If the Muslims dont have to do anything with the attacker, they also should not have to do anything with the victims.

 

[Spring Onion]

In fact it should be the opposite.
The Muslims of one country should not bother about the Muslims of another country. They should not poke their nose on religious basis. If the Muslims dont have to do anything with the attacker, they also should not have to do anything with the victims.

Well .

India is supporting LTTE terrorists and Indian Tamil Nadu is supporting Sri Lankan tamils not morally but practically so its kinda weired you are talking about Muslims

 

[third eye]

two different things.

being a victim and being an attacker two different things.

Do you agree with the point expressed by the boy in post No 1 about attack one amounts to attack all ?

 

[Langda Tyaagi]

Well .

India is supporting LTTE terrorists and Indian Tamil Nadu is supporting Sri Lankan tamils not morally but practically so its kinda weired you are talking about Muslims

That is also wrong i agree. But two wrongs does not make one right. If something is wrong, it IS wrong. Period.

 

[Spring Onion]

You can not twist the logic to suit your dialog now ...can you....or should you???

If attack on One Muslim is attack on all Muslims... then attack by one Muslim is attack by all Muslims.

Logic? what logic is there in your comment?

Its simple i will take side of the victim BUT wont take side of an attacker. Simple as that.


Iraq/Afghanistan/Syria all these attackes supported by US are unjustified and state terrorism simple as that

Do you agree with the point expressed by the boy in post No 1 about attack one amounts to attack all ?

1. If you attack Iraq/iran/ Syria we consider it a point to criticise you and stand with these Muslim countries .

2. If US attack India we will stand with India on the basis ofour neighbour and India being a victim of aggression.


What is there NOT to understand?

Iraq/Afghanistan/palestine and Syria and so on all these attacks supported by US are NOT justified.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Iraq/Afghanistan/Syria all these attackes supported by US are unjustified and state terrorism simple as that

That's absolutely true.

But why are the extremists hitting all the major countries in the world, not just America?

If you look at the Global Terror Index, the worst affected regions are South Asia, Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia, Russia, etc.

The West gets off very lightly. Even China receives more terrorist attacks than America does, America has only received two major ones this decade, 9/11 and Boston.

The West is least affected by this problem even though they are supposed to be the reason behind the attacks.

 

[Langda Tyaagi]

Logic? what logic is there in your comment?

Its simple i will take side of the victim BUT wont take side of an attacker. Simple as that.


Iraq/Afghanistan/Syria all these attackes supported by US are unjustified and state terrorism simple as that



1. If you attack Iraq/iran/ Syria we consider it a point to criticise you and stand with these Muslim countries .

2. If US attack India we will stand with India on the basis ofour neighbour and India being a victim of aggression.


What is there NOT to understand?

Iraq/Afghanistan/palestine and Syria and so on all these attacks supported by US are NOT justified.

Exactly. So it negates the claim of this terrorist that attack on one Muslim is attack on all of them. He should have said that attack on one innocent, weak guy is the attack on entire humanity. He should not have given it a religious colour to score points. Thats what we are saying.

 

[Spring Onion]

That's absolutely true.

But why are the extremists hitting all the major countries in the world, not just America?

If you look at the Global Terror Index, the worst affected regions are South Asia, Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia, Russia, etc.

The West gets off very lightly. Even China receives more terrorist attacks than America does, America has only received two major ones this decade, 9/11 and Boston.

The West is least affected by this problem even though they are supposed to be the reason behind the attacks.

any attack by extremists individual or on a large scale is NOT recommended neither needed in my opinion.What the Muslim world needs unity coming through the ruling class and trickling down to masses as a show of strength so resolve their issues otherwise the West/US block will continue to Support Al-Qaeda in Syria and attacking it somewhere else.


As far as your question about the double standard well same is with US it supports Al-Qaeda where suits itself and term it terrorist somewhere else.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

any attack by extremists individual or on a large scale is NOT recommended neither needed in my opinion.What the Muslim world needs unity coming through the ruling class and trickling down to masses as a show of strength so resolve their issues otherwise the West/US block will continue to Support Al-Qaeda in Syria and attacking it somewhere else.

As far as your question about the double standard well same is with US it supports Al-Qaeda where suits itself and term it terrorist somewhere else.

Exactly, there needs to be unity in the Muslim world.

It annoys me a lot, that non-Western countries like Russia and China, and Muslim countries themselves, get attacked more often than Western countries like America who are actually supposed to be the cause of this problem.

If the West is responsible then the attacks should fall on them, not us.

The Global Terror Index shows that Western countries experience the least amount of extremist attacks. The ones who suffer the most are the non-Western countries.

 

[Spring Onion]

Exactly. So it negates the claim of this terrorist that attack on one Muslim is attack on all of them. He should have said that attack on one innocent, weak guy is the attack on entire humanity. He should not have given it a religious colour to score points. Thats what we are saying.

Both are the same. The words only make difference to You whereas its same. since majority Muslims are being attacked hence his reference.

anyway indeed attack on One Muslim nation hurts us all the Muslims. When the attacker vs victim is Non-Muslim attacker - Muslim victim then the religious color does automatically arise.

Period.