What's new

When will BrahMos breach Mach 7 barrier?

Dog, you BS BS (bad word). I BS Tamil-RIP I know.

BS = Not a Kannada word.

That's the level of Kannada you know. :lol:

Don't try so hard. South Indian languages are difficult even for other Indians.


Did I claim I was speaking a particular language. I was just making it difficult for people like you to use google translate.
 
Last edited:
.
Did I claim I was speaking a particular language. I was just making it difficult for people like you to use google translate.

You can't use Google Translate on English words, genius.

This is how Kannada looks like:
udhr_kannada.gif
 
.
You can't use Google Translate on English words, genius.

This is how Kannada looks like:
udhr_kannada.gif

You are not testing me my dear. Let me test you. Can you read what you posted. Tell me the meaning of Makku and avaru and where are they?
 
.
You are not testing me my dear. Let me test you. Can you read what you posted. Tell me the meaning of Makku and avaru and where are they?

Normally you are supposed to be giving me the translated meaning. :lol:
 
.
Normally you are supposed to be giving me the translated meaning. :lol:

Meaning you have no clue on what you pasted. Just cutting and pasting from internet sites won't cut it. The burden is on you to prove that you are not a false flagger.
 
.
There we are, mate! Let us suppose that
the structural limits are set and known for
the H-Brahmos. That end won't change.

Then let's fall back on target mobility and notice
how limiting hypermach speeds are for control.

In case A, a big slow moving target such as a
Lion Ing* is within reach of control laws and all
or almost all the job falls on the seeker, really.
In case B, a small fast target like a J-20 or even
a ground vehicle will likely evade control capabi-
lities rather easily. After all, a simple right turn
at mach 7 consumes a lot of space ( and power ).

There will be a class of targets unattainable for
hypermach weapons for the foreseeable future.

Let's review tactics understanding those (initial)
limitations : Large scale attack _HMW= perfect.
Stationary target at very long range= perfect.
Moving target, big and slow & far, adequate with
great seeker or great control loop or later AI.
Moving targets below a certain size : wrong.
Moving targets over a certain speed at maximum
HMW's range : depends on target maneuverability.

So, volleys of land-based HMWs or sub-based if
predetermined targets, on stationary objectives
located in dense enemy territory, fine! Using HMWs
within your territory targeting incoming menaces,
excellent especially if target unaware of launch.

BVR fighter missile : preposterous, at least for now.

What is big, slow and far a target in the mind of the
nation that "sells" hyper mach weapons? I think I
gave enough of a hint in my outlined cases especial-
ly if you consider the Seabasing concept.

_ _ _ _

As for this new announcement, it is not so new :

Next BrahMos missile targets Mach 7, integration with SU30MKI completed

WHITESMOKE, Aug 11, 2012, in forum: Indian Defence Forum

15 minutes of flight at mach 7 from an MKI
launched from Hasimara AFS would easily
reach Shangaï if launched at 1,200Km from
base, leaving the aircraft well able to return?

For reference, at 20ºC, dry air and sea level,
Mach 7 equals 8,535.71 kilometers per hour.

So, despite Kaptaan Ali's mumblings, apart
from long range, faster speeds for most mil
applications will come the old fashion way
by augmenting existing Mach 3, Mach 4 +
weapons ... which is what's happening here.

I'm still dubious on such timetable claims.
They seem to me to correspond to the usual
bragging by armament corps to get more ...
money... sorry, funding.

Have a great day, Tay.

* Neither ING the bank nor Emperor Ing from
Metroid Prime but the SF&F novel character, OFC!
Hi @Taygibay
On a slightly different note, this is the indigenous micro turbofan for nirbhay CM that under went high altitude testing at LEH. It performed satisfactorily and produced 400kgf of thrust.
IMG_20180501_200148.jpg


Also no matter what fan boys say, the major challenge now in achieving hypersonic speeds is purely metallurgy. They have not been able to sustain the combustion for more than 20 seconds, for any meaningful weapon they'd have to demonstrate the combustion for at least 2 full minutes. In my personal opinion pushing brahmos to ~3.5machs is within the reach of DRDO, however anything beyond 5 would require substantial work and time.
 
Last edited:
.
Meaning you have no clue on what you pasted. Just cutting and pasting from internet sites won't cut it. The burden is on you to prove that you are not a false flagger.

Nope, the burden is on you to translate what he has posted.
 
. .
great control loop or later AI.
@Taygibay
In fact I'm working on such a control strategy. I'm expecting my second AIAA paper very soon. It deals with precisely such a control strategy wherein we partially know the system dynamics, yet the control system is expected to track desired trajectory. The major challenge I've faced till now is the computational complexity , for instance if I take an aerospace model with 9 states then my neuro fuzzy controller needs at least 3^9 or 19683 integrations to approximate just one element of the unknown dynamics. That's where multi core processors come in handy. I'll gladly share my research with you, also do you want to read my first AIAA paper?
 
.
Nope. I read the words from what he posted. Now he needs to prove that from where I read them and what they mean. Now it is his turn.

LOL... how dumb do you think people are ? You think they cannot see thought your simple tricks ? :disagree:
 
.
LOL... how dumb do you think people are ? You think they cannot see thought your simple tricks ? :disagree:

It is very apparent to all people reading here that @randomradio has been confirmed as a false flagger and is running away from the challenge.

Here is a test for you. Where is the word paraspara.
 
. . . . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom