Do u realize how rude it sounds to tell someone u sound naive?? Not even indians have said this to me. Ihave resesrched and read alot abt these bits of history cuz they always got me curious. U arent even sure abt so many things ,u dont even know them and u are telling someone for being naive.
Naive meaning:
(of a person or action) showing a lack of experience, wisdom, or judgement.
There is nothing abusive about it. So please no need to give me a speech. Plus i clearly said "no offense". I never called you a naive person, i said you sound naive. That your judgement is somewhat incorrect, lacks wisdom.
U arent even sure abt so many things ,u dont even know them and u are telling someone for being naive.
Take a look at it from a different angle, that makes you not sure of many things too.
The article was unbiased, true. And straight to the point. Thus the reason for the good feedback. Historical facts were checked from different sources, if you think something was incorrect, do tell. Would be edited.
That man himself confessed after bangla was formed that the aim of 6 points was to carve out sa sep state.
Care to share these statements. This again sounds so naive, he would become the PM of state, of both East and West Pakistan, why would he want to break up a wing. When Pakistan (both East and West) were stronger together. There identity on which they were made was the same.
Thia ia one reason ihad read abt why he was alowed to walk free. And even elections in east pakistan were riggged, not many ppl know for god's sake.
What? where are you getting your information from?
@syedali73 would agree with me. Many historians have said it on many occasions that '71 elections were the fairest elections in Pakistan history. If they were rigged, for god sake why didn't Bhutto raise a voice or why didn't Yahya do anything?
Our rulers were wrong too but, o coolness of my eyes wajsal u know jack abt bengali nationalism ,it so fierece and bs-ingly aggressive, u got no clue yara.
This is shear stupidity Bangali nationalism to some point was a factor in Bangladesh's creation. But they died out, one point in time. Our politicians incompetence bred them back. But the major causes where something completely different. Major causes West Pakistanis caused.
If he was a traitor and they had evidence against him, he should have never been allowed to contest in the elections. I haven't seen proof to this date that links him to Agartha conspiracy. Somethings are twisted by history.
It's like saying, we made no mistakes.
Don't feel offended. I am simply replying to a post, which i feel has many flaws in it.