What's new

What Might an India-Pakistan War Look Like?

and enjoy this... dus kadam ...pakistan khatam..................................:D

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Nuclear bombs detonating all over and 1.5 billion people in Hell. End of story. I mean that's how these threads end. :D

Not necessarily.

You see 54-55 Indian cities with a million and above population.

20 odd major ports.

Major airports.

Major economic centers.

May be 50 more Indian cities with over a lakh of population.

There you go.

Though I recommend that at least 300 major Indian cities should be targeted.

Baaqi second strike mein.
 
.
Indian support to the terrorist groups in Afghanistan is nothing new. India was the main financier of the N.Alliance too, and everyone knows what happened to it. Pakistan's intelligence apparatus is totally committed to the Afghan theater as since long we have been regarding Afghanistan as a battle ground for proxies. Indian support for the TTP/BLA can only last until Americans allow & Americans will allow until we are ready to throw them a bone to provide them an exit which gives some adrenaline shots to their tax payers and so that they could shout "USA USA" upon their return as "heros" so that the govt that does it gets another term.

Current situation is that Pakistan is bargaining with the Americans on "give some, take some" policy, once Americans get their piece of the pie, they will turn their backs on India before it even notices, they are pretty good at that. Lastly, India's existence in Afghanistan is a great danger to Pakistan's national security and therefore India under no circumstances will ever be tolerated in Afghanistan. The clock is ticking, Pakistan has time you dont !

The US is going nowhere even after 2014 and time will prove that, Afg provides them a perfect spot to oversee on Russia, China and Iran. The heightened apprehension of India's presence in Afg in Pakistan is necessary to some extent but it's over the top right now, TTP, BLA support from India is neither proved nor documented so cannot really say anything about that and everything till now is just assumptions and speculations.

US is definitely looking for a victory or solution in Agf and looking at PK to provide the gateway to Taliban and to open up negotiations - which PK is again apprehensive about with fear that US may overtake the complete process after initialization so PK wants a defined role specified by the US for PK in Afg after troop withdrawal which the US is not committing to..

Turning of US back on India is most probably definitive hence the decreased engagement and involvement in Afg from India though the US wants India to be more actively involved, India can if it wants get proper commitments before engaging in Afg but it is reluctant to do so because of PK's proxy role in Afg.

Afg is crucial for the US and it is engaging in holing up in Kabul building multiple structures and bases there, there will not be complete withdrawal and PK knows that hence there has been multiple attacks on US personnel and bases to make them rethink.
Its a cat and mouse game and the scenario will be revealed in 2014.
 
.
In an all out war, there will be complete destruction of everything surrounding India and Pak. We must avoid it at all costs.
 
.
No tin horn - when we go down. we take you down with us.

And keep all the 72 as well.

As i said, SUICIDAL. And for some reason, you and your ilk tend to take that as a compliment.
 
. . .
Not necessarily.

You see 54-55 Indian cities with a million and above population.

20 odd major ports.

Major airports.

Major economic centers.

May be 50 more Indian cities with over a lakh of population.

There you go.

Though I recommend that at least 300 major Indian cities should be targeted.

Baaqi second strike mein.

Wet Dreams of Pakistan!!!!! :coffee:
 
.
Not necessarily.

You see 54-55 Indian cities with a million and above population.

20 odd major ports.

Major airports.

Major economic centers.

May be 50 more Indian cities with over a lakh of population.

There you go.

Though I recommend that at least 300 major Indian cities should be targeted.

Baaqi second strike mein.

Wet Dreams of Pakistan!!!!! :coffee:
 
.
Not necessarily.

You see 54-55 Indian cities with a million and above population.

20 odd major ports.

Major airports.

Major economic centers.

May be 50 more Indian cities with over a lakh of population.

There you go.

Though I recommend that at least 300 major Indian cities should be targeted.

Baaqi second strike mein.


dont forget my a$$ :lol:
 
.
Not necessarily.

You see 54-55 Indian cities with a million and above population.

20 odd major ports.

Major airports.

Major economic centers.

May be 50 more Indian cities with over a lakh of population.

There you go.

Though I recommend that at least 300 major Indian cities should be targeted.

Baaqi second strike mein.

Shaikh_Chilli ,


First thing no one knows that duffer "pakistani" nuke are really effective on war ground or just Drama of pakistan ,

If war started and ur nuke are effective in reality , First thing india will try to destroy ur nuke , there will be help from surrounding , America is despirate to destroy nuke of country like pak .
 
.
The US is going nowhere even after 2014 and time will prove that, Afg provides them a perfect spot to oversee on Russia, China and Iran. The heightened apprehension of India's presence in Afg in Pakistan is necessary to some extent but it's over the top right now, TTP, BLA support from India is neither proved nor documented so cannot really say anything about that and everything till now is just assumptions and speculations.

US is definitely looking for a victory or solution in Agf and looking at PK to provide the gateway to Taliban and to open up negotiations - which PK is again apprehensive about with fear that US may overtake the complete process after initialization so PK wants a defined role specified by the US for PK in Afg after troop withdrawal which the US is not committing to..

Turning of US back on India is most probably definitive hence the decreased engagement and involvement in Afg from India though the US wants India to be more actively involved, India can if it wants get proper commitments before engaging in Afg but it is reluctant to do so because of PK's proxy role in Afg.

Afg is crucial for the US and it is engaging in holing up in Kabul building multiple structures and bases there, there will not be complete withdrawal and PK knows that hence there has been multiple attacks on US personnel and bases to make them rethink.
Its a cat and mouse game and the scenario will be revealed in 2014.

India has been able to generate a limited scaled diversionary effort from Afghanistan against Pakistan by supporting the terrorists. However, their effort beyond a certain level may intrusively confront the American interests.

Though Americans have also utilized such Indian sponsoring to achieve some of their objectives as well, such Indians actions and efforts would tend to lose support in the long run whence the Americans may initiate stability enhancing measures in Afghanistan.

Therefore, Indian efforts by default are restricted due to time and space limitations. Beyond these time and space limitations, Indian sponsoring would hurt the American efforts and would then become counter productive.

The Americans will retain 4-6 bases in Afghanistan as their next objective, after Iran, is full spectrum domination of Eurasian Hinterland and is therefore beyond Afghanistan. For such objective attainment, it is important for Afghanistan to attain a measure of stability. Indians will have to stop at a particular stage.

And if one goes by the happenings in Libya and Syria etc, the same body of trouble makers would be moving in to Central Asia in not too distant a future. This would leave Pakistan relatively free from such activities.

The Indians therefore can smile for the time.
 
. .
It means that if the CIA/MI6 or Mossad is successful in a terrorist attack in India using Pakistani citizens, both countries will go to war and play in the hands of those who will benefit from it at the expense of their people and future economic stability.
I just hope that the military establishments in both countries are wise enough to consider everything before taking such actions with irreversible consequences.
khuda ke waste maf krdo, Geo tv ya ET pe ap ki zarorat hai
 
.
I think we should stop it with the defencisive wars, no matter how nice and ethical we try to be, the media will never support us. Just nuke/napalm strategic locations like ports, oilfields, airports
 
.
Back
Top Bottom