What is wrong with this Ad, and why is it banned?

[Chhatrapati]

define sub continent?

Google is not banned in Pakistan, right?

 

[El Sidd]

Google is not banned in Pakistan, right?

What are the chances that you would say Google is now an Indian?

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Found Sanskrit outside the subcontinent yet?

You never asked me this specifically. When I explained calmly to you elsewhere that Aryans brought Sanskrit and the caste system into the subcontinent, you went quiet. I also mentioned some Russian and steppe region tribes share religious customs with Hindustanis, hence some linguistic similarities exist therein. This phenomenon suggests a common precursor for both religious and linguistic elements followed by Indian Hindus and these Asiatic tribes.

The precursor languages of Vedic Sanskrit did not originate in Hindustan. They came from western regions. Mostly, descendants of the precursor languages are now dead as Arabic and other families came to dominate. Only in India did this branch persist (though most in India don't actually speak Sanskrit). It is in many senses a dead language.

As for who spoke it first, Syrians did.

Fact check: India wasn't the first place Sanskrit was recorded – it was Syria

As the Narendra Modi government celebrates Sanskrit, a look at the oldest known speakers of the language: the Mitanni people of Syria.

www.google.com

 

[Vortex]

Mehwish Hayat will play Benazir in her biopic.

The actress was awarded National Award portraying her as the role model for upcoming generation.

She is a vocal PTi supporter.

will she also play the part about Benazir’s corruption ?

 

[El Sidd]

will she also play the part about Benazir’s corruption ?

It is not good for the feminist soft power propaganda hence corruption will be highlighted as failure of an adequate system holding pious people like Benazir and Imran Khan hostage.

Anything else Mr. Moral Police Mullah?

 

[Vortex]

It is not good for the feminist soft power propaganda hence corruption will be highlighted as failure of an adequate system holding pious people like Benazir and Imran Khan hostage.

Anything else Mr. Moral Police Mullah?

what you said is true, people are not bad, but system makes bad people.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

reason behind its ban

The reason my friend is very simple. The reason is found in India. Bollywood. Majority of Pakistan laps up obsene, vulgar, sleazy Bollywood films. Pakistan's often know more about the lifes of actor/actresses in India then they do about their relatives. Ask the cinema hall owners about the demand for Bollywood Indian films.

So what is the nightmare of Bollywood industry? That Pakistan might build up over time a media and film industry that might match or knock out Bollywood. Now we can't have that can we? So Bollywood has stooges inside Pakistan to make sure no creative media is nurtured. Kill it. Erase it before it even stands.

Thus making sure Bollywood remains king.

 

[El Sidd]

what you said is true, people are not bad, but system makes bad people.

yeah its all kingdom of heaven ain't it Hebdo?

 

[HalfMoon]

will she also play the part about Benazir’s corruption ?

How about this?

 

[Mujahid Memon]

 

[Vortex]

How about this?

View attachment 678509

View attachment 678511

View attachment 678512

She do whatever she want in her private life.

 

[El Sidd]

Classic PTI with PTA.

They imported coconut oil and shampoos from India at the height of pandemic and then the advisor fled the country for pastures new.

Then they put sedition charges on their political opponents and people of Azad Kashmir for not bowing down to Modi.

Wah !!

 

[masterchief_mirza]

"The team found evidence that people began colonizing India more than 50,000 years ago and that there were multiple waves of migration into India from the northwest over the last 20,000 years, including waves of people from Anatolia, the Caucasus and Iran between 9,000 and 5,000 years ago.

But evidence for one migration was particularly striking: The genetic makeup of the Y chromosome dramatically shifted about 4,000 to 3,800 years ago, the study found. About 17.5 percent of Indian men carry a Y-chromosome subtype, or haplogroup, known as R1, with the haplogroup more dominant in men in the north compared to the south of India.

This new finding points to an ancient group of people who inhabited the grassland between the Caspian and Black seas from about 5,000 to 2,300 years ago, known broadly as the Yamnaya people. The Yamnaya (and its later subgroup, the Andronovo culture) typically buried their dead in pit graves, drove wheeled horse chariots, herded livestock and spoke an early precursor Indo-European language. About 5,000 years ago, people from this culture almost completely transformed the genetic landscape of Europe, a 2015 Science study suggests.

The genetic signature of the Yamnaya people shows up strongly in the male lineage, but hardly at all in the female lineage, the study found.

One possibility is that a group of horse-riding warriors swept across India, murdered the men and raped or took local women as wives, but not all explanations are that martial, Richards said. For instance, it's possible that whole family units from the Yamnaya migrated to India, but that the men were either able to acquire (or started out with) higher status than local males and thus sired more children with local women, Richards said.

"It's very easy for Y-chromosome composition to change very quickly," Richards told Live Science. "Just because individual men can have a lot more children than women can.""

Aryan Invasion May Have Transformed India's Bronze-Age Population

A new genetic analysis may vindicate the so-called Aryan migration theory, which holds that invaders from Central Asia conquered India about 3,500 years ago.

www.google.com

@Chhatrapati note my above post. The invaders brought the Indo-European proto language with them, along with other gifts.

 

[El Sidd]

"The team found evidence that people began colonizing India more than 50,000 years ago and that there were multiple waves of migration into India from the northwest over the last 20,000 years, including waves of people from Anatolia, the Caucasus and Iran between 9,000 and 5,000 years ago.

But evidence for one migration was particularly striking: The genetic makeup of the Y chromosome dramatically shifted about 4,000 to 3,800 years ago, the study found. About 17.5 percent of Indian men carry a Y-chromosome subtype, or haplogroup, known as R1, with the haplogroup more dominant in men in the north compared to the south of India.

This new finding points to an ancient group of people who inhabited the grassland between the Caspian and Black seas from about 5,000 to 2,300 years ago, known broadly as the Yamnaya people. The Yamnaya (and its later subgroup, the Andronovo culture) typically buried their dead in pit graves, drove wheeled horse chariots, herded livestock and spoke an early precursor Indo-European language. About 5,000 years ago, people from this culture almost completely transformed the genetic landscape of Europe, a 2015 Science study suggests.

The genetic signature of the Yamnaya people shows up strongly in the male lineage, but hardly at all in the female lineage, the study found.

One possibility is that a group of horse-riding warriors swept across India, murdered the men and raped or took local women as wives, but not all explanations are that martial, Richards said. For instance, it's possible that whole family units from the Yamnaya migrated to India, but that the men were either able to acquire (or started out with) higher status than local males and thus sired more children with local women, Richards said.

"It's very easy for Y-chromosome composition to change very quickly," Richards told Live Science. "Just because individual men can have a lot more children than women can.""

Aryan Invasion May Have Transformed India's Bronze-Age Population

A new genetic analysis may vindicate the so-called Aryan migration theory, which holds that invaders from Central Asia conquered India about 3,500 years ago.

www.google.com

@Chhatrapati note my above post. The invaders brought the Indo-European proto language with them, along with other gifts.

but the dancing doll was unearthed here with pouty lips.

Now its all banned. taking away local culture from the people by foreign persian ideologies

 

[Chhatrapati]

Aryans brought Sanskrit and the caste system into the subcontinent, you went quiet.

I went quite because things went off the stupidity threshold. Even now conjectures and a scroll article lol. Let's assume what you say is right, but this is it, Is that the absolute evidence of Sanskrit origins outside India?

Between 1500 and 1350 BC, a dynasty called the Mitanni ruled over the upper Euphrates-Tigris basin, land that corresponds to what are now the countries of Syria, Iraq, and Turkey. The Mitannis spoke a language called Hurrian, unrelated to Sanskrit. However, each and every Mitanni king had a Sanskrit name and so did many of the local elites. Names include Purusa (meaning “man”), Tusratta (“having an attacking chariot”), Suvardata (“given by the heavens”), Indrota (“helped by Indra”) and Subandhu, a name that exists till today in India.


Linguistics is not Archeology, so far, the earliest form of Sanskrit is Rig Veda and has absolutely no indication of foreign origins. I reiterate, there is zero evidence for Sanskrit or even Rig Vedic Sanskrit being spoken outside the subcontinent, the most I can think of in relation to Sanskrit is Avestan, but then you went to Syria.

The precursor languages of Vedic Sanskrit did not originate in Hindustan. They came from western regions. Mostly, descendants of the precursor languages are now dead as Arabic and other families came to dominate. Only in India did this branch persist (though most in India don't actually speak Sanskrit). It is in many senses a dead language.

As for who spoke it first, Syrians did.

No, it didn't, it's like saying Persians spoke Sanskrit because Avestan sounds a lot similar to Magadhi Prakrit. Or say IVC originated in Mesopotamia because similar seals like the ones found in IVC sites were found in those places. You should read the article you quoted.

Sanskrit was never a widely spoken language in India, not at any point in history Sanskrit had any major speakers. It was either Pali, Prakrit or languages derived from Sanskrit.