What's new

What has Saudi Arabia lost in the attempt to please its 'master'?

GlobalVillageSpace

Media Partner
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
993
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
What has Saudi Arabia lost in the attempt to please its 'master'?
Global Village Space |


Sufian Qazi |

A long time ago, a wild dog visited a city to meet his urban dog friend. The wild dog was skinny, weak, and sapless as he had to ramble all over the forest to deal with his hunger. However, the urban dog, usually fed by his master, was robust, healthy, and in fine fettle. Wild dog asked his friend, what made him so healthy and fresh? He said, "I look out my master’s house and in return, he feeds me with delicious food. But for this, he ties me up in the house all day.’’ The wild dog, free from such shackles, replied, "I cannot compromise my freedom over lavish food; I am happy with my hunger."

In simple words, it is a tradeoff. Saudis understand their vulnerabilities, however, on the other hand, the US is highly dependent on Saudi Oil.

Many people on social media criticized the King of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), Shah Salman, for shaking hands with Melina Trump, reckoning it as anti-Islamic in a country where Sharia Laws are practiced at the state level. Ostensibly, it was just a handshake on a sacred land for Muslims; but in fact, it depicted the underlying historical context based on strategic and economic bilateral relations between the two countries.

Read more: A comprehensive guide to Trump’s speech addressing the Muslim world

The two nations, that relish favorite nation status from both sides, have long historical relations. In simple words, it is a tradeoff. Saudis understand their vulnerabilities – like countering Iranian influence in the region, protection of oil fields and securing pilgrimage routes – however, on the other hand, the US is highly dependent on Saudi Oil. The ties between two countries skyrocketed during WWII when axis powers wrecked Saudi oil fields in Dhahran, and in the Cold War era when the US realized the imperativeness of profound relations with the Kingdom to counter the spreading out of Soviet communism in the Middle East.

Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud, the founder and first ruler of modern Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, seized Arabian Peninsula from the Turks in 1932. The Britain abetted Ibn Saud against the Turks after WWI and became the first country to recognize Saudi Arabia as an independent state. The US president Roosevelt took the two-pronged relations above the peaks of Himalayas and put it as: ‘Saudi Arabia’s defense is vital for the defense of the United States’.

Both historical belligerents - Saudi Arabia and Iran - along with their master(s), mainly the US, have made the region a depiction of melancholy.

Amidst all this chaos, one reality that is extensively ignored: how the Western powers are playing ‘divide and rule’ in the Middle East to shelter their agendas at the cost of instability in the Muslim World. Following this regional uncertainty, today Saudi Arabia has become the largest arms shopper from the United States. Hours after landing in Saudi Arabian capital Riyadh, the President’s first stop on his foreign trip, Donald Trump and Saudi King Salman signed a series of agreements that included a military sales agreement of about $110bn, effective immediately, plus another $350bn over the next decade.

Read full article:

What has Saudi Arabia lost in the attempt to please its 'master'?
 
.
What has Saudi Arabia lost in the attempt to please its 'master'?
Global Village Space |


Sufian Qazi |

A long time ago, a wild dog visited a city to meet his urban dog friend. The wild dog was skinny, weak, and sapless as he had to ramble all over the forest to deal with his hunger. However, the urban dog, usually fed by his master, was robust, healthy, and in fine fettle. Wild dog asked his friend, what made him so healthy and fresh? He said, "I look out my master’s house and in return, he feeds me with delicious food. But for this, he ties me up in the house all day.’’ The wild dog, free from such shackles, replied, "I cannot compromise my freedom over lavish food; I am happy with my hunger."

In simple words, it is a tradeoff. Saudis understand their vulnerabilities, however, on the other hand, the US is highly dependent on Saudi Oil.

This is a beautiful metaphor for such a master-slave relation. Turkey is in no way as rich as the SA regime but she has dignity because of her freedom loving people and an able leader. That is something the SA monarch can only dream of.
 
.
In simple words, it is a tradeoff. Saudis understand their vulnerabilities, however, on the other hand, the US is highly dependent on Saudi Oil

Again instead of researching the facts you are writing articles on preconceived notions. The US is NOT highly dependent on Saudi oil. We only import 25% of our oil from other countries (ever hear of Shale oil???) Saudi Arabia makes up only 11% of that 25%. So that's about 2.5% of the oil we use every day. If you think that makes us dependent on Saudi Arabia you are insane.

How come you can't spend 1 minute actually researching such a simple fact?
 
Last edited:
.
This is a beautiful metaphor for such a master-slave relation. Turkey is in no way as rich as the SA regime but she has dignity because of her freedom loving people and an able leader. That is something the SA monarch can only dream of.

There is something very wrong about the Saudi Monarchy.
 
.
In simple words, it is a tradeoff. Saudis understand their vulnerabilities, however, on the other hand, the US is highly dependent on Saudi Oil.
OK, thats totally wrong as mentioned by @hamartia-antidote.

during WWII when axis powers wrecked Saudi oil fields in Dhahran
It was only Italy,although an axis power that bombed a CASOC oil installation in Dhahran crippling Saudi Arabia's oil production.

Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud, the founder and first ruler of modern Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, seized Arabian Peninsula from the Turks in 1932.
As far as i remember, Ibn Saud only fought two wars with turks. One in which Al-Hasa Incorporated to Saudi Arabia. the second one was against Jabal Shammar but turks on Jabal Shammar side.

I would also condemn writer's choice of words in title. I also couldn't find any convincing point made by writer to support his argument. Even if someone is taking benefit of situation, it doesn't means he's master
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom