What's new

What happens after the American Century?

.
So us preferring using low-risk strategies, rather than your high-risk suggestion (funding Al-qaeda) against America makes us your enemy.

OK, why not. :lol:

The corrected quote is what I meant when I said I view your country as an enemy. Although this is not what you said.

Both strategies are wrong, I never said my countries were right. Don't put words in my mouth that I did not say.
 
.
The corrected quote is what I meant when I said I view your country as an enemy. Although this is not what you said.

Both strategies are wrong, I never said my countries were right. Don't put words in my mouth that I did not say.

So why did you suggest that we follow America's path of funding terrorist and extremist groups?
 
.
The corrected quote is what I meant when I said I view your country as an enemy. Although this is not what you said.

Both strategies are wrong, I never said my countries were right. Don't put words in my mouth that I did not say.
So why did you suggest that we follow America's path of funding terrorist and extremist groups?

China has already funded Pot and supported Mujaheddin in Afghan against USSR and today, the North Korean gangster.

China is not clean either. Just that the PRC here are myopic about histories and current affairs.
 
.
So why did you suggest that we follow America's path of funding terrorist and extremist groups?

I wasn't suggesting you to use our strategies, I was stating that you would likely use methods of your own onto other countries such as Pakistan in the future as you become a China Super power.
 
.
I wasn't suggesting you to use our strategies, I was stating that you would likely use methods of your own onto other countries such as Pakistan in the future as you become a China Super power.

Well I can't predict the future, obviously. But that's a long way off.

If you are really concerned about Pakistan (as you seem to be) then feel free to try and convince them.
 
.
the only people who buy the american century are the chinese , a revolution in china will change everything
 
.
Unfortunately, with the way things are going now, we are moving closer and closer to WWIII and there will be a lot of instability all over the world , ( even in the US). Neoconservatives are 100% percent responsible, pushing US to global conflict with Russia , China, and Iran. They really don't have a long term strategy. But that's not surprising considering their loyalty is NOT WITH AMERICA.
 
.
Unfortunately, with the way things are going now, we are moving closer and closer to WWIII and there will be a lot of instability all over the world , ( even in the US). Neoconservatives are 100% percent responsible, pushing US to global conflict with Russia , China, and Iran. They really don't have a long term strategy. But that's not surprising considering their loyalty is NOT WITH AMERICA.

They don't want WW3, since in WW3 everyone dies to nuclear winter, including them.

So they will pick a fight with adversaries that do not possess a nuclear arsenal, or those that lack the delivery systems to attack the American mainland with nuclear weapons.

They had a chance to fight Russia over Crimea, to uphold their 1994 promise to protect Ukraine's borders.

They had a chance to fight China when we seized the Scarborough shoal in 2012, especially since America has a "mutual defence pact" with the Philippines.

But in both cases they chose not to, despite having obligations to do so.

That's why I'm surprised that Iran isn't seeking nuclear weapons.
 
.
They don't want WW3, since in WW3 everyone dies to nuclear winter, including them.

So they will pick a fight with adversaries that do not possess a nuclear arsenal, or those that lack the delivery systems to attack the American mainland with nuclear weapons.

They had a chance to fight Russia over Crimea, to uphold their 1994 promise to protect Ukraine's borders.

They had a chance to fight China when we seized the Scarborough shoal in 2012, especially since America has a "mutual defence pact" with the Philippines.

But in both cases they chose not to, despite having obligations to do so.

That's why I'm surprised that Iran isn't seeking nuclear weapons.


That's because we have Obama now, as soon as neocons seize power again in 2016, America will be at war. They really don't care what happens to America, they wanted US involved in Syria, China, Russia, anywhere they can create conflict.

And Iranian politician don't want nuclear weapons because they believe it will cause more instability in the Middle east. you know Instability-stability paradox.
 
Last edited:
.
That's because we have Obama now, as soon as neocons seize power again in 2016, America will be at war. They really don't care what happens to America, they wanted US involved in Syria, China, Russia, anywhere they can create conflict.

And Iranian politician don't want nuclear weapons because they believe it will cause more instability in the Middle east. you know Instability-stability paradox.

After WW2 almost every US president had involved America into a war except Jimmy Carter, i hope Iran will not make the same mistake as Libya did. Well Iran is a strong country, not to be underestimated by the Americans.
 
.
What happens after the American Century?

peace, hopefully.. :laugh:
 
. .
American Century will end in 2050. Than USA will end globalism and **** up China and Russia.

China and Russia will kill each other for money and oil. US Navy ships will blockade all sea routes and sink all Chinese ships. And china can´t do jackshit against it.
 
.
21st century is the Chinese century. China will really dominate the global economy soon. Its the biggest country and it will become the most dominant as well. The only thing that keeps a country below its rightful place in the world is a lack of brains. And thats where Chinese are making up ground very fast. They are closing the mental gap between west and themselves. So its safe to say that this century will belong to China.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom