What's new

What Did the U.S. Get for $2 Trillion in Afghanistan?

Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
13,771
Reaction score
-2
Country
Netherlands
Location
Netherlands
By SARAH ALMUKHTAR and ROD NORDLAND DEC. 9, 2019

All told, the cost of nearly 18 years of war in Afghanistan will amount to more than $2 trillion. Was the money well spent?

There is little to show for it. The Taliban control much of the country. Afghanistan remains one of the world’s largest sources of refugees and migrants. More than 2,400 American soldiers and more than 38,000 Afghan civilians have died.

Still, life has improved, particularly in the country’s cities, where opportunities for education have grown. Many more girls are now in school. And democratic institutions have been built — although they are shaky at best.

Drawing on estimates from Brown University’s Costs of War Project, we assessed how much the United States spent on different aspects of the war and whether that spending achieved its aims.


$1.5 trillion waging war
The Taliban control or contest much of the country.

taliban-map-300.png

Yellow=Taliban controlled areas
Light=Contested

When President George W. Bush announced the first military action in Afghanistan in the wake of terrorist attacks by Al Qaeda in 2001, he said the goal was to disrupt terrorist operations and attack the Taliban.

Eighteen years later, the Taliban are steadily getting stronger. They kill Afghan security force members — sometimes hundreds in a week — and defeat government forces in almost every major engagement, except when significant American air support is used against them.

Al Qaeda’s senior leadership moved to Pakistan, but the group has maintained a presence in Afghanistan and expanded to branches in Yemen, northern Africa, Somalia and Syria.

The $1.5 trillion in war spending remains opaque, but the Defense Department declassified breakdowns of some of the three most recent years of spending.

Most of the money detailed in those breakdowns — about 60 percent each year — went to things like training, fuel, armored vehicles and facilities. Transportation, such as air and sea lifts, took up about 8 percent, or $3 billion to $4 billion a year.

$10 billion on counternarcotics

Afghanistan supplies 80 percent of the world’s heroin.
In a report last year, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction described counternarcotics efforts as a “failure.” Despite billions of dollars to fight opium poppy cultivation, Afghanistan is the source of 80 percent of global illicit opium production.

Before the war, Afghanistan had almost completely eradicated opium, according to United Nations data from 1996 to 2001, when the Taliban were in power.

Today, opium cultivation is a major source of income and jobs, as well as revenue for the Taliban. Other than war expenditures, it is Afghanistan’s biggest economic activity.

$87 billion to train Afghan

military and police forces
Afghan forces can’t support themselves.
One of the major goals of the American effort has been to train thousands of Afghan troops. Most of American spending on reconstruction has gone to a fund that supports the Afghan Army and police forces through equipment, training and funding.

But nobody in Afghanistan — not the American military, and not President Ashraf Ghani’s top advisers — thinks Afghan military forces could support themselves.

The Afghan Army in particular suffers from increasing casualty rates and desertion, which means they have to train new recruits totaling at least a third of their entire force every year.

President Barack Obama had planned to hand over total responsibility for security to the Afghans by the end of 2014 and to draw down all American forces by 2016. That plan faltered when the Taliban took quick advantage and gained ground.

The American military had to persuade first President Obama, and then President Trump, to ramp up forces. Some 14,000 U.S. troops remained in the country as of this month.

$24 billion on

economic development
Most Afghans still live in poverty.
War-related spending has roughly doubled the size of Afghanistan’s economy since 2007. But it has not translated into a healthy economy.

A quarter or more of Afghans are unemployed, and the economic gains have trailed off since 2015, when the international military presence began to draw down.

Overseas investors still balk at Afghanistan’s corruption — among the worst in the world, according to Transparency International, an anticorruption group — and even Afghan companies look for cheaper labor from India and Pakistan.

Hopes of self-sufficiency in the mineral sector, which the Pentagon boasted could be worth $1 trillion, have been dashed. A few companies from China and elsewhere began investing in mining, but poor security and infrastructure have prevented any significant payout.

$30 billion on other

reconstruction programs
Much of that money was lost to corruption and failed projects.
American taxpayers have supported reconstruction efforts that include peacekeeping, refugee assistance and aid for chronic flooding, avalanches and earthquakes.

Much of that money, the inspector general found, was wasted on programs that were poorly conceived or riddled with corruption.

American dollars went to build hospitals that treated no patients, to schools that taught no students (and sometimes never existed at all) and to military bases the Afghans found useless and later shuttered.

The inspector general documented $15.5 billion in waste, fraud and abuse in reconstruction efforts from 2008 through 2017.

Thanks to American spending, Afghanistan has seen improvements in health and education — but they are scant compared with international norms.

Afghan maternal mortality remains among the highest in the world, while life expectancy is among the lowest. Most girls still receive little or no schooling, and education for boys is generally poor.

$500 billion on interest

The war has been funded with borrowed money.
To finance war spending, the United States borrowed heavily and will pay more than $600 billion in interest on those loans through 2023. The rest of the debt will take years to repay.

In addition to the more than $2 trillion the American government has already spent on the war, debt and medical costs will continue long into the future.

$1.4 trillion on veterans that have
fought in post-9/11 wars by 2059
Medical and disability costs will continue for decades.
More than $350 billion has already gone to medical and disability care for veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Experts say that more than half of that spending belongs to the Afghanistan effort.

The final total is unknown, but experts project another trillion dollars in costs over the next 40 years as wounded and disabled veterans age and need more services.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/09/world/middleeast/afghanistan-war-cost.html
 
Last edited:
. . .
By SARAH ALMUKHTAR and ROD NORDLAND DEC. 9, 2019

All told, the cost of nearly 18 years of war in Afghanistan will amount to more than $2 trillion. Was the money well spent?

There is little to show for it. The Taliban control much of the country. Afghanistan remains one of the world’s largest sources of refugees and migrants. More than 2,400 American soldiers and more than 38,000 Afghan civilians have died.

Still, life has improved, particularly in the country’s cities, where opportunities for education have grown. Many more girls are now in school. And democratic institutions have been built — although they are shaky at best.

Drawing on estimates from Brown University’s Costs of War Project, we assessed how much the United States spent on different aspects of the war and whether that spending achieved its aims.


$1.5 trillion waging war
The Taliban control or contest much of the country.

taliban-map-300.png

Yellow=Taliban controlled areas
Light=Contested

When President George W. Bush announced the first military action in Afghanistan in the wake of terrorist attacks by Al Qaeda in 2001, he said the goal was to disrupt terrorist operations and attack the Taliban.

Eighteen years later, the Taliban are steadily getting stronger. They kill Afghan security force members — sometimes hundreds in a week — and defeat government forces in almost every major engagement, except when significant American air support is used against them.

Al Qaeda’s senior leadership moved to Pakistan, but the group has maintained a presence in Afghanistan and expanded to branches in Yemen, northern Africa, Somalia and Syria.

The $1.5 trillion in war spending remains opaque, but the Defense Department declassified breakdowns of some of the three most recent years of spending.

Most of the money detailed in those breakdowns — about 60 percent each year — went to things like training, fuel, armored vehicles and facilities. Transportation, such as air and sea lifts, took up about 8 percent, or $3 billion to $4 billion a year.

$10 billion on counternarcotics

Afghanistan supplies 80 percent of the world’s heroin.
In a report last year, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction described counternarcotics efforts as a “failure.” Despite billions of dollars to fight opium poppy cultivation, Afghanistan is the source of 80 percent of global illicit opium production.

Before the war, Afghanistan had almost completely eradicated opium, according to United Nations data from 1996 to 2001, when the Taliban were in power.

Today, opium cultivation is a major source of income and jobs, as well as revenue for the Taliban. Other than war expenditures, it is Afghanistan’s biggest economic activity.

$87 billion to train Afghan

military and police forces
Afghan forces can’t support themselves.
One of the major goals of the American effort has been to train thousands of Afghan troops. Most of American spending on reconstruction has gone to a fund that supports the Afghan Army and police forces through equipment, training and funding.

But nobody in Afghanistan — not the American military, and not President Ashraf Ghani’s top advisers — thinks Afghan military forces could support themselves.

The Afghan Army in particular suffers from increasing casualty rates and desertion, which means they have to train new recruits totaling at least a third of their entire force every year.

President Barack Obama had planned to hand over total responsibility for security to the Afghans by the end of 2014 and to draw down all American forces by 2016. That plan faltered when the Taliban took quick advantage and gained ground.

The American military had to persuade first President Obama, and then President Trump, to ramp up forces. Some 14,000 U.S. troops remained in the country as of this month.

$24 billion on

economic development
Most Afghans still live in poverty.
War-related spending has roughly doubled the size of Afghanistan’s economy since 2007. But it has not translated into a healthy economy.

A quarter or more of Afghans are unemployed, and the economic gains have trailed off since 2015, when the international military presence began to draw down.

Overseas investors still balk at Afghanistan’s corruption — among the worst in the world, according to Transparency International, an anticorruption group — and even Afghan companies look for cheaper labor from India and Pakistan.

Hopes of self-sufficiency in the mineral sector, which the Pentagon boasted could be worth $1 trillion, have been dashed. A few companies from China and elsewhere began investing in mining, but poor security and infrastructure have prevented any significant payout.

$30 billion on other

reconstruction programs
Much of that money was lost to corruption and failed projects.
American taxpayers have supported reconstruction efforts that include peacekeeping, refugee assistance and aid for chronic flooding, avalanches and earthquakes.

Much of that money, the inspector general found, was wasted on programs that were poorly conceived or riddled with corruption.

American dollars went to build hospitals that treated no patients, to schools that taught no students (and sometimes never existed at all) and to military bases the Afghans found useless and later shuttered.

The inspector general documented $15.5 billion in waste, fraud and abuse in reconstruction efforts from 2008 through 2017.

Thanks to American spending, Afghanistan has seen improvements in health and education — but they are scant compared with international norms.

Afghan maternal mortality remains among the highest in the world, while life expectancy is among the lowest. Most girls still receive little or no schooling, and education for boys is generally poor.

$500 billion on interest

The war has been funded with borrowed money.
To finance war spending, the United States borrowed heavily and will pay more than $600 billion in interest on those loans through 2023. The rest of the debt will take years to repay.

In addition to the more than $2 trillion the American government has already spent on the war, debt and medical costs will continue long into the future.

$1.4 trillion on veterans that have
fought in post-9/11 wars by 2059
Medical and disability costs will continue for decades.
More than $350 billion has already gone to medical and disability care for veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Experts say that more than half of that spending belongs to the Afghanistan effort.

The final total is unknown, but experts project another trillion dollars in costs over the next 40 years as wounded and disabled veterans age and need more services.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/09/world/middleeast/afghanistan-war-cost.html
Free supplies of dugs to USA and europ.. as we all know war durgs and politics are best business in the world
 
. .
Come on don't be so bitter. This is a genuine question.

After any investment the investor calculates the return.
And what I gave was a genuine answer. We got nothing or at best very little in the short term, but in the long run, we learned more than you can digest. And that is what other countries are afraid of.
 
.
And what I gave was a genuine answer. We got nothing or at best very little in the short term, but in the long run, we learned more than you can digest. And that is what other countries are afraid of.
If its about learning why couldnt u learn from Russia defeat in Afghanistan. It is US failure. No one would spend trillions just for sake of learning.
 
.
If its about learning why couldnt u learn from Russia defeat in Afghanistan. It is US failure. No one would spend trillions just for sake of learning.
Speaking of learning...The circumstances are not the same. :lol:

Keep in mind Afghanistan was used as a base for Islamic terrorism, whereas, during the Cold War, Afghanistan was a strategic goal for expansion. Different causes, different reasons to get involved. But ultimately, not just US but the world learned that Afghanistan is a lost cause. From now on, if Afghanistan is used for anything hostile, the country and the people will suffer the wrath of retaliation again. But of course, Islamists do not care about such trivial matters.
 
. .
Smart people would ask: 'What did the US learned from Afghanistan?' And they worries for their countries.


so $2 Trillion for a lesson?..

Speaking of learning...The circumstances are not the same. :lol:

Keep in mind Afghanistan was used as a base for Islamic terrorism, whereas, during the Cold War, Afghanistan was a strategic goal for expansion. Different causes, different reasons to get involved. But ultimately, not just US but the world learned that Afghanistan is a lost cause. From now on, if Afghanistan is used for anything hostile, the country and the people will suffer the wrath of retaliation again. But of course, Islamists do not care about such trivial matters.


Islamic terrorism?..

really?

seems like OBL was upset with your soldiers were in his land?... seems pretty political to me. Never mind the fact he was happy to take CIA supplied satellite phones, weapons etc from during the 1980s even though one of the critiqued nation in the Quran was the Jews who were and continue occupying the holy land i.e. Jerusalem

of course people who invade wars on a pack of lies and justify murder of millions do not care about such trivial details

no?
 
.
Speaking of learning...The circumstances are not the same. :lol:

Keep in mind Afghanistan was used as a base for Islamic terrorism, whereas, during the Cold War, Afghanistan was a strategic goal for expansion. Different causes, different reasons to get involved. But ultimately, not just US but the world learned that Afghanistan is a lost cause. From now on, if Afghanistan is used for anything hostile, the country and the people will suffer the wrath of retaliation again. But of course, Islamists do not care about such trivial matters.
And yet US wants to have a dialogue to same guys whom they started the fight.

It was US failure $trillion is huge amount and with no result achievement is a big failure.
 
.
Smart people would ask: 'What did the US learned from Afghanistan?' And they worries for their countries.
like iran, syria, north korea and countless other countries...now more than ever they have realized one thing...

that USA taxpayer have no will or appetite to wage war..trump was elected to end war and if he doesnt the next president will be elected to endwar...

USA in his history has never been attacked thanks to our geography
it has intervened for common good or its interests..
and today it can no longer do that due to its post 9/11 tragedy mistakes...

the evidence is syria..in ordinary circumstances, USA would have intervened in syria..
 
.
What has the US gained?
  • Tens of thousands of poor households recieved an income as they sent their men to kill other peoples families.
  • US weapons manufacters recieved hundreds of billions of dollars, keeping open factories and support industries.
  • American political parties recieved billions in donations from the owners of the above businesses.
  • US politicians had a convenient bad guy to hide behind if their governments were doing poorly.
  • US security companies recieved billions in business from government agencies buying equipment and training and developing new security protocols to "fight terrorists".
The tax payer will pay the cost in the future, but what price is freedom, the freedom to do whatever you want with no real consequence?
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom