farhan_9909
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 8,989
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
Indians bahaduri ki baatain bhi krne lag gye hain ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But as time changes, opportunities also change. So can another measure be used to neutralize China. That is the question that today's analysts in MoD should ask and I am sure have asked and prepared for. The goal remains the same, the means keep changing.
And FYI: China was allied and also tried to help..but was constrained because India was ahead in diplomacy and managing the environment.
All these factors that you posted come after the issue I pointed out.
That you drew flawed 'facts' of what he said.
I agree with the suggestion that India should start more cooperation with Iran. There is no denying that sooner or later, Sunni extremism will engulf all. The ISIS is just the start, even if they are defeated, a new group will pop up - they will all be sunni and all aspire to start their own caliphate.I agree with every point apart from the one where he states to place troops on Afghanistan. Let the Muslims deal with that one.
.
And I'm asking what those means are, because quite frankly, China isn't the weak sauce nation it use to be.Yes, it no longer applies. But as time changes, opportunities also change. So can another measure be used to neutralize China. That is the question that today's analysts in MoD should ask and I am sure have asked and prepared for. The goal remains the same, the means change.
When you have a lunatic that has a lot of followers, you need to make sure he gets as little air time as possible. I'd rather people not listen to lunacy and risk giving him more power.I disagree. I think everyone has the right to air their views and should air their views.
Better to know what everyone is thinking and make an informed choice than be led astray by guile and lack of information.
China and Pakistan weren't allied back than nor did the nuclear paradigm exist.
Yeah we are illiterates and Indians have Harvard Degree instead of their Birth Certificates....Have some respect, he's a Harvard graduate. Illiterates like you can only dream of reaching his position.
New Recruit
Have some respect, he's a Harvard graduate. Illiterates like you can only dream of reaching his position.
New Recruit
more like hamid gulCome on ..... he is an anti dote to Sir Zaid Hamid....with better degrees and a very good resume.
If you do not wish to agree. You are more than free to do so.Any more fairy tales, ifs and buts?
Oh just like India is always ahead of everyone, every single time.
In Washington, Nixon analysed the situation thus: ‘If the Russians get away with facing down the Chinese and the Indians get away with licking the Pakistanis…we may be looking down the gun barrel.’
Excerpts and Sources from 929 page long Volume XI of the Foreign Relations of the United States
Basically you are agreeing that you put your interpretation to his words and tried to pass it off as facts.I wrote them the way they were MEANT to be, which you are incapable of digesting.
there will be no Pakistan too... don't talk like kid...Congratulations. I am sure when he gets an actual debrief from the Indian Strategic Command about our Nuclear posture, he would have to increase the number of Indians dead in a Pakistani nuclear strike from a 100 million to a Billion.
If we are attacked, we will unleash a sort of hell that will become a collective 'chita' of a Billion or so Indians. Pakistan has nothing to fear from a lunatic like him, Indians do.
there will be no Pakistan too... don't talk like kid...