A 'limited' Nuclear War in S.Asia, would kill 2 Billion people | Study Finds.

[Kompromat]

 

[Kompromat]

 

[Kompromat]

@Irfan Baloch | You still can't access it?

 

[Skull and Bones]

Swamy koi forward karo ye.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

I can see it thanks

 

[American Pakistani]

Some mentally ill Indians who supports Indian terrorist groups such as RSS, VHP, Modhi, Tamil tigress don't care.

Here is proof

Q: But Pakistan is a nuclear weapons state.

Swamy: So what? Let them use nuclear weapons. We’ll use it on them. There will be no Pakistan left. May be 100 million will die, no problem.

Somebody misled Modi to say nation needs 'bitter medicine', says Subramanian Swamy (India TV Exclusive)

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Jr swamy on PDF should "crunch" on this ..

 

[Kompromat]

Swamy koi forward karo ye.

Tweet kardiya

 

[Skull and Bones]

Tweet kardiya

Ab twitter par Swamy bhakt ke joote parenge tere par. :burn:

 

[Jungibaaz]

There. Finally. Too many folks I've come across have said that in such an event 'we' would wipe out Pakistan, whereas 'we'd' absorb the damage and live on.

 

[That Guy]

lol, I can't help but feel you posted this to piss off a certain some one.

 

[qamar1990]

View attachment 37400 View attachment 37401 View attachment 37402 View attachment 37403 View attachment 37404 View attachment 37405 View attachment 37406 View attachment 37407 View attachment 37408

most will be indians i heard.

 

[Indischer]

Frankly, no one can predict the outcome of a nuclear war on South Asia.
Neither Pakistan nor India currently has a nuclear triad, period. Hence, the idea of MAD is a non-starter so long as the lacuna exists.
Given this fact, the actual number of nuclear weapons that the two Nations are effectively able to exchange in a War is extremely speculative. Given that the country that initiates the exchange does so on a massive scale, chances are that the nuclear chain of command of the adversary can be hit to an extent that a retaliatory strike might not even take place.

 

[qamar1990]

we really need to make peace between india and pakistan.
enough of the fighting.

Frankly, no one can predict the outcome of a nuclear war on South Asia.
Neither Pakistan nor India currently has a nuclear triad, period. Hence, the idea of MAD is a non-starter so long as the lacuna exists.
Given this fact, the actual number of nuclear weapons that the two Nations are effectively able to exchange in a War is extremely speculative. Given that the country that initiates the exchange does so on a massive scale, chances are that the nuclear chain of command of the adversary can be hit to an extent that a retaliatory strike might not even take place.

wel since india has no first use policy, it would be pakistan that would have to hit hard enough that we get no response from india.

 

[Indischer]

we really need to make peace between india and pakistan.
enough of the fighting.


wel since india has no first use policy, it would be pakistan that would have to hit hard enough that we get no response from india.

Possible. Which is why India is so desperate at setting up a fleet of nuclear subs. Only with a fleet of such subs which can collectively carry enough nukes to assure MAD can India be truly sure that Pakistan will not ring in the first nuke shots on the subcontinent.

 

[qamar1990]

Possible. Which is why India is so desperate at setting up a fleet of nuclear subs. Only with a fleet of such subs which can collectively carry enough nukes to assure MAD can India be truly sure that Pakistan will not ring in the first nuke shots on the subcontinent.

well lets concentrate on peace.
it can start on a same level on this forum and hopefully spread