What's new

A 'limited' Nuclear War in S.Asia, would kill 2 Billion people | Study Finds.

Some mentally ill Indians who supports Indian terrorist groups such as RSS, VHP, Modhi, Tamil tigress don't care.

Here is proof



:crazy::crazy::crazy:

Q: But Pakistan is a nuclear weapons state.
Swamy: So what? Let them use nuclear weapons. We’ll use it on them. There will be no Pakistan left. May be 100 million will die, no problem.


He categorically said "Once Pakistan use it, India too can use it" Do you see something wrong in this statement?? What u expect Indian to say?

"Pakistan nuke us , we will not use Nukes" ?

And moreover its Pakistanis who are maniac of Nuke, and dream to Nuke India..
 
He categorically said "Once Pakistan use it, India too can use it" Do you see something wrong in this statement?? What u expect Indian to say?

"Pakistan nuke us , we will not use Nukes" ?

And moreover its Pakistanis who are maniac of Nuke, and dream to Nuke India..

Pakistan's policy is clear in front of the world...if Pakistan is going down it will pull India down with itself.

Also what do you expect Pakistan to do? You keep occupying Pakistani territories & demand people of those areas to migrate to Pakistan if they don't wanna live under Indian occupation? It is because of Indian stubbornness that threat of war exists in South Asian region.
 
All war started by Pakistan and u are claiming us Aggressor.. What else we will do, Pakistan is doing coward attacks on India.. There is limit of terrorism..

Stop talking like dumb...India was & is always aggressor but plays victim card. India gulped many territories illegally. IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir is a clear example where even today 7lakh Indian occupier terrorists are terrorizing innocent people. There is a limit of that.
 
There is no such thing as a “Limited Nuclear War”. In my view it is stupid to even to contemplate one. Once a war, especially a nuclear war, starts; no one can say for certain what its limits would be. It is doubtful that after a nuclear exchange the command, control & communication (C3 in military lingo) network would remain in place for the High Command to effectively control the battlefield.

Mutually Assured Destruction(M.A.D.) is based on the assumption that use of nuclear weapons by two opposing sides would effectively result in the destruction of both the attacker and the defender, becoming thus a war that has no victory nor any armistice but only total destruction.

This was the rationale which kept an uneasy peace between the Super powers during almost half a century of Cold War. And also despite the famous ‘Cold Start’ doctrine, India did not launch an attack on Pakistan following terrorist attacks on Indian parliament building in Delhi and after the Bombay attacks.

Nukes are only a deterrent, never to be used against an enemy who happens to have them too; hence so much emphasis on stopping the spread of nuclear weapons.
 
And also despite the famous ‘Cold Start’ doctrine, India did not launch an attack on Pakistan following terrorist attacks on Indian parliament building in Delhi and after the Bombay attacks.

It was after the hostilities of 2001 that India started developing the so called cold start doctrine, after the shortcomings of the earlier doctrinal strategies were felt.

After the Mumbai attacks, India did not decide to go to war - but that's not the fault of the doctrine. The doctrine only explains how the country will wage war, not when or if it will.

But yes, the existence of nuclear weapons plays a large part in making that choice (or not making the choice).
 
Back
Top Bottom