What's new

We need two more years to defeat Pakistan | Subramanian Swamy

Really you must be blind not to notice all the Khans
 
1- 7 Years in Making Cruise Missles Fails Test
2- India's nuclear arsenal failed by 'unreliable' missiles
3- India's nuclear tests: U.S. intelligence 'failure' seen

LOL



Yes you can hit your own head hard with a saucepan :) Talking about literacy. Your idiot from Harvard stirred this shit up. Now I am really going to call you my mom.
are you gonna eat nukes everyday ?? lol ... A5 ... let me know about Pakistan automobile industry n space exploration Doctors ..
 
No might as well NOT but you sir are clearly bleeding Danger007. Give up :)
 
And producers beg them to come sign them dude. Get your facts straight. 90% of the movies have Khan in them.
 
LOL at some people talking about surviving nuclear war, if war is on such scale that Pakistan is wiped out but India survives, than what left of India will not only have to deal with uncountable miseries+nuclear zombies(deformed people) of its own but nuclear zombies from a wiped out country across border and all this "victory" will be over bread basket( that raised earliest civilization on Earth) turned into nuclear wasteland, is this what Hindutva is all about??, I want to see how such a country survives civil war/chaos.
 
LOL at some people talking about surviving nuclear war, if war is on such scale that Pakistan is wiped out but India survives, than what left of India will not only have to deal with uncountable miseries+nuclear zombies(deformed people) of its own but nuclear zombies from a wiped out country across border and all this "victory" will be over bread basket( that raised earliest civilization on Earth) turned into nuclear wasteland, is this what Hindutva is all about??, I want to see how such a country survives civil war/chaos.

Swamy has a vaccine to fix that, he injected a little bit of that vaccine into our little anti fact friend @Contrarian - you've seen how good it works. :D
 
No might as well NOT but you sir are clearly bleeding Danger007. Give up :)
thank god.. We are not grouped with failed states. give up for what.... do we have nukes are not it does matter...
 
I gave an example based on what India has done before. China was neutralized for a successful war with Pakistan.

Wrong, at no point was Indian diplomacy behind neutralizing China.

In 1965, Ayub was offering to end diplomatic contacts with China to please the Americans. In 1971, the Chinese were staring at the Soviet Juggernaut in the form of Soviet 58th Army right down the barrel. The Chinese were so sh** scared of the Soviets, they retreated 100 miles in-land to avoid encirclements. There intelligence was convinced the Soviets would attack. So, we can't really blame the Chinese for being preoccupied with their own problems because the Soviet 58th Army was far more scarier than the Indian Army. But i like how you spin doctored it, and made it look like an Indian diplomatic victory.

On a side note, its too bad the Indians weren't able to neutralize China in 2002 and 2008. Although i must applaud your Ambassador to China and your Foreign Office, they certainly made a lot of noise about China shipping weapons to Pakistan.

Meh..your capability even at full capacity is doubted by various analysts here. So there really is no point in reiterating this.

But your Generals don't seem to share the same views observed by the so called various analysts here. When Pakistan roared in 2002 and 2008, India backed down. If Pakistan's capabilities were as defunct as you think they are, Indian Army would have burned down GHQ.
 
This is how the story goes.
  • Indian Muslims share DNA with the Hindus which makes them Hindus.
  • Caliphate will be established and India will go to War with Caliphate.
  • India should wage War and send 200,000 troops to Afghanistan (invasion)
  • Keep dumping your head in the sand on Kashmir
  • We can defeat Pakistan in a War, but we need two more years
  • Before we go to War with Pakistan, we need to 'neutralize' China through War.
  • Start a Nuclear War , doesn't matter how many Indians die (as long as i'm not one of them), we have to finish the satanic, evil Pakistanis.

    End of thesis, good luck to India. May God give you more of these 'Think Tanks'.

Lord have mercy on this guy!!! This is a "Think Prank" Not a think tank. Every sentence smells like war. Now before the Indian community starts to go nuts on my comments and compare it to the US. Please note, we don't start wars and tell others "so what if 100 millions die". Wars have collateral. Not end of humanity. This guy's a nut job. Frankly speaking, this kind of Hindu-Taliban type sentiment is a black mark on India (and everywhere else where people have this mentality)
 
Lord have mercy on this guy!!! This is a "Think Prank" Not a think tank. Every sentence smells like war. Now before the Indian community starts to go nuts on my comments and compare it to the US. Please note, we don't start wars and tell others "so what if 100 millions die". Wars have collateral. Not end of humanity. This guy's a nut job. Frankly speaking, this kind of Hindu-Taliban type sentiment is a black mark on India (and everywhere else where people have this mentality)

and he claims to have a secret ear of PM Modi.
 
Q: Swamy, let’s come to the concept of ‘Hindu Rashtra’. Can you explain what do you mean by ‘Hindu Rashtra’ and how will it be different from today’s Secular India?

Swamy: Let me start with this. This election was an amalgam of three issues.

One was Narendra Modi’s governance record. People were convinced that this man can rule the country. And it was a big plus for us because on the other side was the ‘buddhu’. There was no match.

Second was the fight against corruption which I led. People got convinced that yes these people can remove corruption. There was not a single corruption charge either against me or Modi. So the people were convinced and there was support for BJP as party of honest people.

Third, the cadre of the BJP which had gone to sleep after 2004, after 6 years of secularism of NDA, they suddenly got fired up that Modi means Hindutva with RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat putting the entire weight behind him. So Hindutva was the third factor. And all three factors are important. You can’t just do governance and expect people to support you. There is large number of Hindus who believe that they have got a raw deal. And it also includes particularly educated young people.

Now coming back to your question of ‘Hindu Rashtra’, it does not mean that only a Hindu can be a prime Ministry. ‘Hindu Rashtra’ does not mean only Hindus can occupy public office. That is a ‘Muslim Rashtra’, ‘Christian Rashtra’ but never a ‘Hindu Rashtra’.

All through history, even Shiva ji, who spoke about Hindu Rashtra, had a Muslim as commander-in-Chief. In 1857, we made Bahadur Shah Zafar as emperor who appointed a Hindu his Prime Minister. If your secularism is that the church and the state are to be separate, and that is the original definition, then we have already done that throughout the history.

Second, the Hindu concept of secularism is ‘Sarva Dharma Sam-bhava’ and it means that all religions lead to God. So we show respect to all religions. The Jews came, we looked after them. The Parsis came, we looked after them. The Arab Muslims came and we looked after them in Kerala. But will the Muslims say that all religions lead to God? No, they’ll never say that. They’ll say if you don’t believe in Islam, you are Kaafirs. And you are fit for either conversion or killing. Christians will say that you are pagans if not Christians and that devil has got your souls. You are to be saved and in extreme form like crusade they will kill also. So the only religion in the world that has practiced Sarva Dharma Sam-bhava is Hinduism.

Q: My question is how would this Hindu Rashtra be different from the secular India that we have today?

Swamy: We’ll teach Sanskrit. We’ll teach them the correct history of India. We’ll say that all Hindus are one. That varna is not birth based. Its discipline and duty based.

Q: You had written an article in DNA for which Harvard had dropped your courses. In that article you wrote that those Muslims who don’t accept Hindu ancestry should be disenfranchised. Do you still stand by that?

Swamy: First of all, my courses had nothing to do with that. The courses related to Economics.

Yes, I stand by that statement because it’s drawn out of the partition of India. India was one country, there was no country called Pakistan. So the British had to create a legal entity called Pakistan. So they had introduced a bill in parliament that was called “Indian independence Act”. It was passed in June 1947 after a big debate.

In the debate, they said that there are Muslims who say that we have no connection with Hindus except for the fact that we ruled over them and we don’t want to live with them. The British said that we can’t abandon them and it’s our job to protect them. So we’ll partition India into two countries – India and Pakistan.

For Muslims who said that they have no connections with India and that they didn’t want to live with Hindus, partition was created. Therefore, Muslims who wanted to live separately went to Pakistan. But those Muslims who stayed on were people who accepted that they are willing to live with Hindus and they had connections with Hindus. And what is that connection? That is the ‘Scientific study on DNA’, published in the University of Cambridge, Journal of Genetics. There were studies in Houston, Mysore University as well. All these DNA studies show that the Hindu DNA and Muslim DNA is the same. So what does it mean and that’s what I had said. And if you don’t want to identify with Hindus, Pakistan is there for you.

Q: You are also supposed to be an authority on foreign relations, how do you look at what is happening in middle-east especially the way ISIS is marching ahead with vengeance? According to some media reports, the ISIS has the vision of an Islamic state that stretches up to Gujarat in India. How serious is that from Indian perspective.

Swamy: Serious enough for us to prepare for war. We’ll have a war.

Q: War with whom?

Swamy: War with the Islamic caliphate that will be set up very soon which will include Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Q: What should the Government of India do?

Swamy: Start preparing. Send troops to Afghanistan. Make friends with Iran because they are Shiites and those militants are all Sunnis.

Q: You want India to send troops to both Afghanistan and Iraq?
Swamy: Yes, to Iraq to save our people and I’m happy that India has send its warship there. India should send at least 200,000 troops to Afghanistan.

Q: There is a fear that once these Americans leave, these Talibans will get upper hand and they will turn their focus towards Kashmir.

Swamy: There is no fear, it’s a certainty. Americans will hand over Afghanistan to Taliban and go. And their appetite is Jehad and Kashmir is the obvious place. So we should be ready to go to war. You don’t start the war. They’ll start it and you finish it.

Q: A related question is, what, according to you, would be the solution for Kashmir dispute because it’s lingering for quite a long time.
Swamy: Military solution as there is no peaceful, democratic solution. We have to disown Jawaharlal Nehru and say that he took this matter to UN without the sanction of the cabinet and therefore, it’s an illegal application. Withdraw the application from the UN and put Pakistan on notice and clear out.

Q: Do you think India has the military might to defeat Pakistan?

Swamy: We can acquire the military might. We have the man power for that .

Q: Till the time we acquire that, what should we do?

Swamy: How much time do you want? Have you studied the problem? I have studied it. We need two years only.

Actually, we can defeat Pakistan even today. But we have to neutralize China.

Q: But Pakistan is a nuclear weapons state.

Swamy: So what? Let them use nuclear weapons. We’ll use it on them. There will be no Pakistan left. May be 100 million will die, no problem.

Somebody misled Modi to say nation needs 'bitter medicine', says Subramanian Swamy (India TV Exclusive)



Well done Mr. Swami I support every word you have said.
 
This is a response to Pakistan PM statement "Kashmir is part of Pakistan"

So word war is on ......

Lord have mercy on this guy!!! This is a "Think Prank" Not a think tank. Every sentence smells like war. Now before the Indian community starts to go nuts on my comments and compare it to the US. Please note, we don't start wars and tell others "so what if 100 millions die". Wars have collateral. Not end of humanity. This guy's a nut job. Frankly speaking, this kind of Hindu-Taliban type sentiment is a black mark on India (and everywhere else where people have this mentality)

Did you ever waqtched the interview?

When did he said 100 million is collateral damage ?

All he said is ,"Nuclear blackmail from Pakistan is null as we have nukes too." However he did say to scratch "no first use policy"
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom