What's new

'We mean it,' Israel's Barak tells Iran on nuclear arms

narcon

BANNED
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
0
'We mean it,' Israel's Barak tells Iran on nuclear arms


Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned Iran on Sunday that Israel would never allow Iranian leaders to develop a nuclear weapon, as he addressed a powerful US-Israel lobby.

"It is Iran's pursuit of a nuclear capability which is the greatest challenge facing Israel, the region and the world today," Barak told thousands of delegates at the opening of the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

World powers leading negotiations with Iran to rein in its suspect nuclear program concluded talks in Kazakhstan last week, after putting forward a proposal to ease biting sanctions if Tehran halts its uranium enrichment.

But Barak, stepping down as defense minister as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu draws up a new cabinet, cast doubt on whether the negotiations, due to resume later this month, would have any success.

"Frankly, while exhausting all diplomatic means is understandable, I do not believe it will lead to a moment of truth when the ayatollahs will give up their nuclear situation. Therefore, all options must remain on the table," Barak said.

"We expect all those who say it to mean it. Ladies and gentlemen, we mean it. And let me repeat it, we mean it," he added forcefully, receiving loud applause at the pro-Israel conference.

AIPAC, which touts itself as the most influential US foreign policy lobby, will also hear a speech live from Netanyahu on Monday via video link, following an address by US Vice President Joe Biden.

Some 13,000 people are expected to flock to the three-day event being held at the Washington Convention Center, but the gathering is more muted than in previous years, with neither President Barack Obama nor Israeli President Shimon Peres in attendance.

Obama is preparing to make his first trip as president to Israel in two weeks' time, and Netanyahu has stayed at home as he seeks to patch together a coalition following January's elections.

Iran and its nuclear ambitions will top the agenda for Obama's talks in Israel, along with the war in Syria and the moribund Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

Barak called for "a daring peace initiative vis-a-vis the Palestinians" adding that "a two-state solution is the only viable long-term solution."

The talks have stalled since late 2010, after the Palestinians insisted that all Israeli settlement building must cease.

But Barak placed the blame for the stalemate squarely on the Palestinians saying "they clearly bear most of the responsibility for past failures."

Stressing he was speaking in a personal capacity, the outgoing minister also insisted that if Israel could not even reach an interim agreement with the Palestinians "we should consider unilateral steps in order to place a wedge on this extremely dangerous slippery slope toward a bi-national state.

"It involves demarcating a line within which we would have the settlement blocks and a solid Jewish majority for generations to come," he said.

There have also been fears that Israel could take unilateral action against Tehran, but the threat has somewhat receded after Obama vowed the United States will not pursue a policy of containment if Iran seeks a nuclear weapon.

Iran has denied seeking an atomic bomb, saying its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only.

Barak thanked Obama and former defense secretary Leon Panetta for their "resolute backing of Israel."

And he also wished new Pentagon chief Chuck Hagel "all the best in his new role," adding that "he will no doubt serve his country with the same pride and honor with which he served on the battlefield and in Congress."

Hagel's confirmation by Congress met some stiff opposition from US lawmakers over his past statements on Iran's nuclear program and US-Israeli relations.

Hagel was eventually confirmed last week and he will meet with Barak for the first time as defense secretary on Tuesday.

Netanyahu says Iran using nuclear talks to buy time for bomb | Reuters
 
.
Here's an example of the situation:
Let's assume a dog is protecting and guarding a house.You want to pass the nearby street and you have no intention to go close to that house.Yet, the dog starts barking to show you that he is actually there and you should notice him.and you pass by.

That's the similar situation regarding Iran and Israel.

Israel has been saying the same nonsense for years, and even U.S is starting to ignore them.
 
.
^^ The US is reluctant to attack Iran unless there's no other option left. The reason is that Israel and Iran are a crucial part of American policy of keeping the GCC in line. Nuclear-armed democracy on one side and the Ayatollah on another are enough to keep the Kingdoms/Sheikhdoms fretting about in American favour.

But if it came to choosing between Iran and Israel, then there can be no doubt that Iran will be at the receiving end of American military strength. The Israeli lobby is too strong to let let anything happen otherwise.
 
.
^^ The US is reluctant to attack Iran unless there's no other option left. The reason is that Israel and Iran are a crucial part of American policy of keeping the GCC in line. Nuclear-armed democracy on one side and the Ayatollah on another are enough to keep the Kingdoms/Sheikhdoms fretting about in American favour.

But if it came to choosing between Iran and Israel, then there can be no doubt that Iran will be at the receiving end of American military strength. The Israeli lobby is too strong to let let anything happen otherwise.
If these both countries(Israel and Iran)are a crucial part of keeping the GCC in line,then why they(the US) are arming th GCC countries so much?
Is that not controvertial?
 
.
If these both countries(Israel and Iran)are a crucial part of keeping the GCC in line,then why they are arming th GCC countries so much?
Is that not controvertial?


Without a perceived threat from either Israel or Iran, the GCC would never spend billions on American military hardware.
It's all about business.
 
.
Without a perceived threat from either Israel or Iran, the GCC would never spend billions on American military hardware.
It's all about business.
What i meant was why does the US sell those weapons to them if they are a threat to Isreal or the middle east?
I think for the US,Iran is the bigger threat and thats why they arming the GCC.
The US doesnt do bussiness with countries who are a threat.
 
.
What i meant was why does the US sell those weapons to them if they are a threat to Isreal or the middle east?
I think for the US,Iran is the bigger threat and thats why they arming the GCC.
The US doesnt do bussiness with countries who are a threat.


1. The US is arming Israel against Iran and the Arabs.

2. The US then arms the Arabs against Israel and Iran.

3. Iran is threatened by Israel and GCC military strength and improves its own military and maybe nukes as well.

4. Points number 2 and 3 result in point number 1.
 
.
If these both countries(Israel and Iran)are a crucial part of keeping the GCC in line,then why they(the US) are arming th GCC countries so much?
Is that not controvertial?

You know, Arab countries are not a threat to Israel, no matter how much fancy military equipment they buy.For only one reason: They don't want to be a threat to Israel because U.S doesn't want them to.

Still I think Israel's air force can deal with Arab's air force in an upcoming war which will never happen.

The string goes on, puzzle solved.
 
.
1. The US is arming Israel against Iran and the Arabs.

2. The US then arms the Arabs against Israel and Iran.

3. Iran is threatened by Israel and GCC military strength and improves its own military and maybe nukes as well.

4. Points number 2 and 3 result in point number 1.
I disagree,the US is arming the GCC only to counter Iran and not Israel.
 
. .
1. The US is arming Israel against Iran and the Arabs.

2. The US then arms the Arabs against Israel and Iran.

3. Iran is threatened by Israel and GCC military strength and improves its own military and maybe nukes as well.

4. Points number 2 and 3 result in point number 1.




Is it Zaid Zaman Hamid's Analysis??? What a nonsense...

1. The US is arming Israel against Supporter of Hamas. (Israel has no border with Iran Its Iran who poke there Islamic nose in Palestanian issue, Israel had no issue with "Palestanian killer Pakistan (Read Black September)")

2. The US then arms the Arabs against Iran. (KSA and Iran enimity is well known, I don't remember in last 10 years KSA has shown some aggression against Israel)

3. Iran is threatened by Israel and GCC military strength and improves its own military and maybe nukes as well.
 
.
You know, Arab countries are not a threat to Israel, no matter how much fancy military equipment they buy.For only one reason: They don't want to be a threat to Israel because U.S doesn't want them to.

Still I think Israel's air force can deal with Arab's air force in an upcoming war which will never happen.

The string goes on, puzzle solved.

Actually,what I think is that Israel is only threatening....I am 100% sure that will never dare to attack on Iran...they only attack on weak,weaponless stoneage countries like afghanistan or countries without modern capabilities......
nowdays,gentlemen---israel,usa's strategy for war is changed...they create and implant and fund terrorists groups inside countries...these groups cause maximum economical,damage...these terrorists organizations murders civilians and blast their property..thus leading to destruction.....the problum with iran is...that iran is not allowing us to get access and influence inside it......iran clearly understand's israel-america's strategy to destroy....thats why they are getting frustrated and making these kind of statements...cowards....
 
.
Where do you think Israel gets the bulk of its leading-edge hardware? Trees?
Before you make that statement,you should READ WHAT I WROTE!
Did i write something about the US not arming Israel?
I said the reason for arming the GCC is only to counter Iran.
Take a look at the Israeli military industry,do you think they need much from the US?
The US help for Israel is mostly financial,they have some the best hardware in the world.
 
.
Before you make that statement,you should READ WHAT I WROTE!
Did i write something about the US not arming Israel?
I said the reason for arming the GCC is only to counter Iran.
Take a look at the Israeli military industry,do you think they need much from the US?
The US help for Israel is mostly financial,they have some the best hardware in the world.


I did read what you wrote and I disagree... The GCC has always been wary of Israel's strength and the massive support it enjoys from the US. It's arms procurement is geared against Iran, but Israel has always been at the back of their minds in terms of security concerns. It is the only nuclear-armed state in the Mid-East.

Israel, on the other hand, has shown mistrust with regards to the Arabs in general. The GCC is the only Arab section that has a sizeable military to keep Israel wondering. Had the Arab Spring reached the gulf, there is no saying what policies the future government would have pursued.

You are looking at the situation from recent policies and statements only, but I'm sure you know there is decades of history in the Mid-East.
 
.
Is it Zaid Zaman Hamid's Analysis??? What a nonsense...

1. The US is arming Israel against Supporter of Hamas. (Israel has no border with Iran Its Iran who poke there Islamic nose in Palestanian issue, Israel had no issue with "Palestanian killer Pakistan (Read Black September)")

2. The US then arms the Arabs against Iran. (KSA and Iran enimity is well known, I don't remember in last 10 years KSA has shown some aggression against Israel)

3. Iran is threatened by Israel and GCC military strength and improves its own military and maybe nukes as well.


Emotional beings, aren't we ? :lol:

And if you do want to talk about poking noses, then consider the international nose-poking in Iranian internal developments (aka elections and civilian nuclear technology). Who gave anyone the right to tell Iran what to do?
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom