We have proof of Indian hand in terrorism: Malik

[HAIDER]

Its track down the phone calls across border...

 

[NSG_BlackCats]

The same kind of evidence Indian has indicating Pakistani state complicity and the same kind of evidence the US has indicating OBK is in Pakistan.

Fine, if you have the same evidence what India has, Please ask your government to share it with UN, Interpol, US, UK. At least your government can share it with your long time friend China and people of Pakistan.

When India has shared its evidence many countries have shown their faith on our evidence. So let’s see when your government shows the evidence (If they have any ), what will be reaction of the world.

 

[Hulk]

Fine, if you have the same evidence what India has, Please ask your government to share it with UN, Interpol, US, UK. At least your government can share it with your long time friend China and people of Pakistan.

When India has shared its evidence many countries have shown their faith on our evidence. So let’s see when your government shows the evidence (If they have any ), what will be reaction of the world.

They did shared evidence with USA multiple times and the reaction is also known. Now the next argument will be the USA is involved in all this.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Fine, if you have the same evidence what India has, Please ask your government to share it with UN, Interpol, US, UK. At least your government can share it with your long time friend China and people of Pakistan.

When India has shared its evidence many countries have shown their faith on our evidence. So let’s see when your government shows the evidence (If they have any ), what will be reaction of the world.

What evidence has India shared with anyone, or shown publicly, that indicates the Pakistani state or its institutions were complicit in the Mumbai attacks or other terrorism in India?

Please do tell - or are you also lying like the last gentleman who tried to argue that the dossiers represent a case against the Pakistani state rather than a case against the terrorists involved and perhaps the LeT?

This isn't that hard of a concept to get your head around, so I have to assume you people are deliberately lying and obfuscating the issue.

 

[SMC]

When India has shared its evidence many countries have shown their faith on our evidence. So let’s see when your government shows the evidence (If they have any ), what will be reaction of the world.

You seriously can't be that naive, can you? All these countries saying indian evidence has truth or no means very little. It's in their interest to say that india is right and so on. Pakistan provides no less or no more substantial proof, but due to where interests lie, the evidence is denied or accepted. I can guarantee you if it was interests of NATO or US to admit indian involvement, they would've done so.

 

[SMC]

They did shared evidence with USA multiple times and the reaction is also known. Now the next argument will be the USA is involved in all this.

And that would be correct. It's not in US interests to accept indian involvement. So they will deny it. Quite simple.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

They did shared evidence with USA multiple times and the reaction is also known. Now the next argument will be the USA is involved in all this.

The US stands to make hundreds of billions of dollars in military and nuclear sales to India, and has a strong strategic and economic relationship with India (especially vis a vis China) and hence will not publicly denounce India for its role in terrorism in Pakistan.

This is similar to the role the US has played in protecting Israel from blame and consequences when Israel has committed crimes and atrocities against the Palestinians and violated international law and the UNSC resolutions.

 

[Hulk]

You seriously can't be that naive, can you? All these countries saying indian evidence has truth or no means very little. It's in their interest to say that india is right and so on. Pakistan provides no less or no more substantial proof, but due to where interests lie, the evidence is denied or accepted. I can guarantee you if it was interests of NATO or US to admit indian involvement, they would've done so.

Ok got your point.
1) You shared the evidence with USA, and it does not suits them hence they are denying it as credible evidence.
2) Since USA is not accepting it there is no point in giving it to India.

So in essence you have provided evidence multiple times to USA and it got rejected. That sums it all.

 

[Goodperson]

Oh! What must Rehman Malik be thinking about the terrorist? At least he can clarify whether they were state or stateless actors from India.

Pakistan is not accepting Indian dossier or Indian proofs regarding Saeed. At least Pakistan prepare such dossiers.

 

[SMC]

Ok got your point.
1) You shared the evidence with USA, and it does not suits them hence they are denying it as credible evidence.
2) Since USA is not accepting it there is no point in giving it to India.

So in essence you have provided evidence multiple times to USA and it got rejected. That sums it all.

Mostly right except one thing. We did give india the evidence - at least back in Musharraf days. They denied that they ever got the evidence and denied their involvement. From that, it can be concluded that india is playing a dirty game of first doing terrorism and then denying its involvement in terrorism so it can continue doing terrorism with impunity.

 

[Hulk]

Mostly right except one thing. We did give india the evidence - at least back in Musharraf days. They denied that they ever got the evidence and denied their involvement. From that, it can be concluded that india is playing a dirty game of first doing terrorism and then denying its involvement in terrorism so it can continue doing terrorism with impunity.

Fair enough you gave evidence to India and India is playing dirty games.

What stops you from pursuing with you evidence when situation is so bad that entire world is concerned. Why have you not shared with China and got them on board, them follow up together on UN. I am sure China will help you if you have credible evidence, otherwise what's the point being your best friend.

 

[NSG_BlackCats]

What evidence has India shared with anyone, or shown publicly, that indicates the Pakistani state or its institutions were complicit in the Mumbai attacks or other terrorism in India?

Please do tell - or are you also lying like the last gentleman who tried to argue that the dossiers represent a case against the Pakistani state rather than a case against the terrorists involved and perhaps the LeT?

This isn't that hard of a concept to get your head around, so I have to assume you people are deliberately lying and obfuscating the issue.

•Ask your interior minister on which charge they have arrested Lakhvi.

•Have you heard a guy with the name Kasab? As per one of your channel Geo TV, he is a Pakistani. If you want I will give you a YouTube clip of that video. But if you are a fan of Zaid Hamid ( Kasab is an India and his name is Amar Singh), I have nothing to say.

•Have you forgotten the interview of your own interior minister where he said the Mumbai terror attack plot has been planned partly in Pakistan. I can give you a YouTube clip of that one also.

Don’t believe India. But you even don’t believe your own government. The problem is you live in your own dream world where you have your own assumption and conclusion. Best of luck to you.

regards

 

[SMC]

Fair enough you gave evidence to India and India is playing dirty games.

What stops you from pursuing with you evidence when situation is so bad that entire world is concerned. Why have you not shared with China and got them on board, them follow up together on UN. I am sure China will help you if you have credible evidence, otherwise what's the point being your best friend.

Good question as regards to China. GoP should certainly explore that route if they can.

 

[rohitx007]

You seriously can't be that naive, can you? All these countries saying indian evidence has truth or no means very little. It's in their interest to say that india is right and so on. Pakistan provides no less or no more substantial proof, but due to where interests lie, the evidence is denied or accepted. I can guarantee you if it was interests of NATO or US to admit indian involvement, they would've done so.

ookkaayyyy sirji .chalie aapki bat manli lakin plzz show proofs to ur best buddy

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

•Ask your interior minister on which charge they have arrested Lakhvi.

•Have you heard a guy with the name Kasab? As per one of your channel Geo TV, he is a Pakistani. If you want I will give you a YouTube clip of that video. But if you are a fan of Zaid Hamid ( Kasab is an India and his name is Amar Singh), I have nothing to say.

•Have you forgotten the interview of your own interior minister where he said the Mumbai terror attack plot has been planned partly in Pakistan. I can give you a YouTube clip of that one also.

Don’t believe India. But you even don’t believe your own government. The problem is you live in your own dream world where you have your own assumption and conclusion. Best of luck to you.

regards

None of which is evidence of the Pakistani state or its institutions being involved in Mumbai, which is the accusation leveled by the GoI and Indian military leadership, as I have pointed out repeatedly - so stop lying and obfuscating.