What's new

We had to take defensive measures at all times after the Balakot strike: Air Marshal Nohwar

Very simple and clear message,
IAF bizti offensive mission....failed
IAF double Bizti defensive missions

what else Modi bhagats wants to know, IAF statements are very clear.
 
. .
If one takes a high dose of cocaine orally the effects do subside after a couple of days but when he takes a whole shlong up his ***, then he acts exactly like indians, always high up in their willful delusions.




Think about the story this way. MKI did not get shot down, but Mig-21 shot down F-16.

Anyway, even if 1 MKI got shot down, it was just 1 skirmish. When it comes to aircraft of similar generation, you win some, you lose some.

Regardless Rafale numbers are necessary to climb to 72 over the next few years, especially considering China in the mix, and the Rafales are needed to take out SAM sites. So it doesn't change anything anyway.
 
. . . . . .
Read in full context.
Any force will have to take both active and defensive postures during an operation based on what they have to deal with, if would be foolish to not consider defensive posture when BVRs in play. Anyone gone through training knows it very well that if your defense is strong your attack will be more stronger.

Some people here can jump mount everest out of excitement if any statement remotely meets there narratives.

He is saying Pakistani BVR capability is superior to what India has.

Which part of that statement you don't understand?
 
.
Only Indian SU-30 MKI can carry any potent BVR missiles. All otrher IAF platforms have minimal BVR capabilities or Radars not matching with the BVR range they carry.
There are only 250 odd SU-30 in IAF..
On PAF side the Entire F-16 and JF-17 fleet can carry BVR with matching radars and well Practiced maneuvers.
It was better network centric capabilities that won the Feb-27 Air war.

The ENTIRE fleet of JF-17's and F-16? Isn't that like 100 + 72 = 172 Jets in total as opposed to 250+ SU-30MKI? So doesn't that mean that IAF still had dozens more fighters equipped with BVR???
 
. .
Think about the story this way. MKI did not get shot down, but Mig-21 shot down F-16.

Logically and realistically, IAF and India would have made many more attacks had the IAF been able to down any single PAF Jet. I mean losing an F-16 is a massive deal for PAF and IAF would have seized the opportunity to down a few more to annihilate the morale of PAF. However, IAF went into a shell and the Indian PM admitted that the result would have been different if only IAF had Rafale!

That is admission of loss to the point where IAF and India had to back down and consider alternative options such as ballistic missile attack.......which too had to be abandoned because of expected Pakistani retaliation of 3:1.
 
.
nai, im not a military man, i tell whatever i hear and read!
hear lots of men have a wrong concepts about military projects and so on but are you read from respectable defense sites like janes/ aviation weekly/flight global etc etc or you chose random site to read @Umair Nawaz
 
.
hear lots of men have a wrong concepts about military projects and so on but are you read from respectable defense sites like janes/ aviation weekly/flight global etc etc or you chose random site to read @Umair Nawaz
i read the PDF buddy and the senior members here.....

and i hear the words of AM Shahid Latif and CAS Sohail Aman as i told u! But on the other hand u never told me where did u get information from? U dont expect me to randomly buy yr claims right?
 
.
i read the PDF buddy and the senior members here.....

and i hear the words of AM Shahid Latif and CAS Sohail Aman as i told u! But on the other hand u never told me where did u get information from? U dont expect me to randomly buy yr claims right?
so your only source is PDF, then why you're always pretending to be an expert here if you don't know basic of tactics/strategies and technicalities of different weapons @Umair Nawaz o_O
 
.
Back
Top Bottom