What's new

WB notches up China growth forecast to 9.3%

Chinapak

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Oct 2, 2010
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
shanghaidaily By Wang Yanlin

"The World Bank has raised its forecast for China's 2011 economic growth rate to 9.3 percent from 9 percent and called for full normalization of the macroeconomic stance to contain risks of inflation and the property market.

"China's economic outlook remains broadly favorable with real gross domestic product growth projected at 9.3 percent in 2011 and 8.7 percent in 2012," the Washington-based bank said in its China Quarterly Update released today.

"Risks on inflation and the property market call for full normalization of the macroeconomic stance to keep growth on track," the quarterly report said.

China has shifted to a prudent monetary policy stance since the end of last year, while kept the fiscal policy stance relatively easy to sustain growth.

To combat inflation and runaway home prices, China's central bank has increased the interest rates twice so far this year and lifted the reserve requirement ratio four times to soak up market liquidity.

The report said it found both fiscal and monetary policies contributed to China's tightening of its macroeconomic policy after the end of its massive stimulus package to offset the impact of the global financial crisis.

"Headwind from a normalized macroeconomic stance, inflation, and somewhat slower global growth is likely to be partly offset by solid corporate investment and a still robust labor market," said Ardo Hansson, lead economist for China at the bank.

The report said inflation should moderate eventually from a 32-month high of 5.4 percent in March, with food price increases slowing and core inflation still being in check.

"However, much of the impact of the higher oil and industrial commodity prices is still in the pipeline, inflation expectations are high and there is little spare capacity in the economy," said Louis Kuijs, senior economist and the main author of the report. "Therefore, a full normalization of the macro policy stance is important."

Kuijs said macro policy is better placed to address the risks on inflation and the property market than moral suasion and administrative measures. But the government should maintain fiscal and monetary flexibility to better deal with possible risks.

China's gross domestic product expanded 9.7 percent from a year earlier to 9.63 trillion yuan (US$1.45 trillion) in the first quarter, little changing from the pace of 9.8 percent in the previous three months." :china::pakistan::china:
 
.
we need to cool down, cool down````8% is good number for the following decade``:P
 
.
Real estate bubble has a high possibility in China..It needs to really contain it especially in Cities..They are costlier than the American cities..
 
. .
Sustainable growth can be seen at above 9% you know.
 
.
Real estate bubble has a high possibility in China..It needs to really contain it especially in Cities..They are costlier than the American cities..

Not going to happen. People in China buy with 20-50% downpay, there is zero percent chance of a debt bubble.
 
.
Not going to happen. People in China buy with 20-50% downpay, there is zero percent chance of a debt bubble.

But there is lot more supply than demand yet the prices are artificially up. Because of high down payments not many people are able to afford them further adding to the problem. There's just too much money invested in real estate sector in China..Most of the stimulus went to the infrastructure for which China is not ready yet.
 
.
There are half the population of people waiting to move in to town. Demand is sound for at least next 2 to 3 decades.
 
.
But there is lot more supply than demand yet the prices are artificially up. Because of high down payments not many people are able to afford them further adding to the problem. There's just too much money invested in real estate sector in China..Most of the stimulus went to the infrastructure for which China is not ready yet.

There is actually far more demand. Every one of those homes are owned by an investment owner.
 
.
There is actually far more demand. Every one of those homes are owned by an investment owner.

That doesn't do much for the GDP of a country, doesn't it? Unless there is economic activity by monetary transactions, they are pretty much useless to the macroeconomics of a country. I hope I don't have to explain the reasoning.
 
.
I rather have China spend lots of money on building modern empty cities than on wars around the world. Expanded urban infrastructure will bring high long-term productivity and efficiency to China's economy.
 
.
That doesn't do much for the GDP of a country, doesn't it? Unless there is economic activity of monetary transactions, they are pretty much useless to the macroeconomics of a country. I hope I don't have to explain the reasoning.

Thanks for your concern, but you are not gonna pop it. People have been saying the same exact thing about Hong Kong's investment based real estate market for 50 years and yet it keeps going higher. You're no Li Kashing or Hutchison Whampoa, so try again.
 
.
Thanks for your concern, but you are not gonna pop it. People have been saying the same exact thing about Hong Kong's investment based real estate market for 50 years and yet it keeps going higher. You're no Li Kashing or Hutchison Whampoa, so try again.

Oh. Good for you. I certainly don't care. Its an issue even your Party acknowledges. My only intent was to point it here. Anyways its your country you can do as you please.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom