BHarwana
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 24,827
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
You know nothingAir superiority Air superiority Air superiority
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know nothingAir superiority Air superiority Air superiority
China will abandon Pakistan once their interests are done with them....
LOL. Pakistan never abandoned them they left Pakistan for India.Like Pakistan abandoned Saudia and Emirates / GCC
Damn...And I thought North Korea is crazy.You put 250 JF-17 in air will 10 F-35 be able to dominate the skies? After 4 AAM those F 35 will need to run. F 35 is a force multiplier but with 4 AAM only 4x and some AAM will be evaded so lets make it 3x that means 30 JF 17 will be lost and 10 F 35 will be lost. Now please calculate the cost here. How many billions each country has suffered and the JF 17 side will not reach whole 1 billion but F 35 side will cross 6 billion in damages.
2 years more than 1000 air strikes and not a single inch of land gained in Yemen.Damn...And I thought North Korea is crazy.
By the way,USA might by around 1000 F35,thus outnumbering JF 17 some 3:1.Hell,some 50 F35 can bring any nation to its knees.
It's a maritime strike fighter,not air superiority. Though in today's world,distinction between category matters less.What is the aerial role of J 20?
hmm you are right to some extend but there is more to the role of this jet.It's a maritime strike fighter,not air superiority. Though in today's world,distinction between category matters less.
Did USA invade Yemen?2 years more than 1000 air strikes and not a single inch of land gained in Yemen.
Agreed, But F-35 has a very limited pay load. That will always give traditional jets an edge. The idea of 10X force multiplier will remain a dream but they might achieve 3x.Did USA invade Yemen?
Plus you're mixing conventional vs non conventional warfare.
In any war,USA tries to destroy most of the military infra,hardware and the backbone of opposing military.Non Conventional warfare relies on civilian infra that any country shows reluctance to target.
That's why I barely engage any troll.a simple Google search will tell you the reason why other thinks it's a maritime strike her.Than tell me what is the main role of J-20 you stupid
How do you know that its a maritime strike fighter not air superiority fighter just in your wet dream, wishful thinking and fantasy world
The missing point....Agreed, But F-35 has a very limited pay load. That will always give traditional jets an edge. The idea of 10X force multiplier will remain a dream but they might achieve 3x.
The missing point....
You're mixing things.first,no country will field their pilots for this kind of onslaught. Second,2nd world war style mass attack strategy is long gone.third,you've no idea what a 5 th gen fighter is capable of.Only few days ago,I've seen a video where USA is proposing a new idea in air warfare. f35 will spearhead any air warfare,will exhaust it's missiles and still be able to target any incoming fighter,but only later part,bomb trucks like b1 lancer or b52 carrying dozens of AAMs will carry the missile and F35 will pass the target via secure datalink.
USAF isn't blind to invest massive amount of money on F35 without any tangible benefits
you beleive this third rates site its your choice you are denial mode man with current engine it is way way better than your best air superiority jets and with a planned WS-15 it will compete with F-22, F35 and PAKFAThat's why I barely engage any troll.a simple Google search will tell you the reason why other thinks it's a maritime strike her.
http://www.chinatopix.com/articles/...-s-j-20-stealth-jet-isn-t-air-superiority.htm
You know nothing