Was India Better Under the British ?

[I spikes therefore I am]

chola had influence but bangla was never part of chola empire

Think whatever u want

 

[53fd]

To some of the posters here, let be very clear about history. The British ruled the Indian subcontinent comprising of present day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar. Some of these regions were ruled by princes & kingdoms who signed treaties with the British, whereas others were directly under British control.

 

[I spikes therefore I am]

I call you dumb because you were blaming me wrong or without reading or understanding, that i said mughuls rule all states of Subcontinent.

That's also wrong statement becoz TN is part of Indian subcontinent so frm now exclude both words subcontinent and India in mugual rule crap.

 

[53fd]

Muslims were rulers at that time ,they were dethroned just that.

As I said, the last Mughal ruler was captured & killed in the events of 1857, & Muslims had to suffer much of the aftermath of it as well. When did I say that the British were ruling India at that time? But the British had already 'infiltrated' into the Indian subcontinent before 1857, & had established a significant presence & influence before that as well.

 

[American Pakistani]

That's also wrong statement becoz TN is part of Indian subcontinent so frm now exclude both words subcontinent and India in mugual rule crap.

Why you telling me this for? Do you really understand simple english? How many times i've to tell you it was your indian counterparts who claiming that Mughuls ruled whole Subcontinent, is it that hard to understand?

 

[tamygu]

India was better under any ruler who came from outside there was no chaos strict rule of law. whenever hindus got to rule india it disintegrated very fast reason being hindus dont trust hindus and fight like dogs.hindus can only be a good slave/coolie etc but can not ever make good master or ruler.Thats the only reason of all the 180 countries of the world india remain under foreigh rule only india remain under foreign rulers 90% of the ti,e of its existence.One more reason being hindus are bloody cowards.

 

[RazPaK]

It was if Indians liked slavery, and I don't think anyone on earth likes to be slaves.

 

[jatt+gutts]

^ majority of countries have been ruled once or other times.. egypt was always under foreign rule.. so were greeks and europeans ..iranians were under foreign rule majority of their history... afghanistan is a pawn of world powers even now.

 

[jatt+gutts]

only country which wasnt under foreign rule was nepal and british ... british maybe cause majority of historians are of british origin. who knows what truth. it could be all bullshit. history is full of lies and fairy tales too

 

[53fd]

only country which wasnt under foreign rule was nepal and british ... british maybe cause majority of historians are of british origin. who knows what truth. it could be all bullshit. history is full of lies and fairy tales too

Yes, the Kingdoms of Nepal & Bhutan fought British invasion, but then signed treaties with them.

 

[jatt+gutts]

actually nepal is only country is world to be never ruled by anyone.. but maybe it was insignificant

 

[RazPaK]

only country which wasnt under foreign rule was nepal and british ... british maybe cause majority of historians are of british origin. who knows what truth. it could be all bullshit. history is full of lies and fairy tales too

If you want to go by that logic, then even England was under foreign rule. Look up William of Normandy. Or his alias William the Conqueror.

 

[Lighting_Fighter]

England was ruled by Romans.

 

[RazPaK]

England was ruled by Romans.

Yea but there was no England at the time. There were the Anglo-Saxons, Welsh, Picts ect. Basically it was not a united country, but just a piece of land.

 

[Lighting_Fighter]

Hey, I also read/heard that the family of the Queen of England is jewish decendents. Is it true?

---------- Post added at 06:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:20 PM ----------

Yea but there was no England at the time. There were the Anglo-Saxons, Welsh, Picts ect. Basically it was not a united country, but just a piece of land.

doesnt matter. once u are ruled u r ruled

---------- Post added at 06:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:21 PM ----------

The only country in my knowledge hasn't been ruled is Japan.