What's new

War trophies: When Hindu kings desecrated temples and abducted idols

Tamil is alien to Sri Lanka... it certainly is not native. Tamil is native to the southern portion of India. All of Tamil civilisation is found in Southern India... nothing in Sri Lanka except the remnants of invasions by the Cholas. The Tami culture, language, history, and its civilisation find home in what is now South India.

The Sinhalese didn't come from anywhere. If they did, there would have been Sinhalese kingdoms in India where the Sinhalese language was spoken, with Sinhalese kings etc. There is absolutely zero evidence for any of that. Zilch. Nothing. Nothing at all to support the idea that there were any Sinhalese kingdoms, no evidence of the Sinhalese language ever being spoken in India.

Sinhalese is not an Indo-Iranian language it is an Indo-Aryan language.

There were no doubt people who spoke a prakrit language who migrated to Sri Lanka. But the Sinhalese language itself is native to the island. It developed completely in the island, flourished completely in the island and is unique to the island. You will not find this language anywhere else in the world. Unlike Tamil it is native to the island.

There is no evidence for "some other dravidian language" prior to the arrival of Prakrit.

Tamils are invaders to Sri Lanka. They did not build any civilisation in the island. It is the Sinhalese who did that. All the Tamils did was loot, destroy and attack the prosperous and flourishing Sinhalese kingdoms.

The fact that there are Tamil speakers in Sri Lanka just goes to show that they are relatively recent arrivals to the island.
People who spoke Prakrit which later developed into Sinhalese migrated to Sri Lanka and it is a historical fact..not even Sri lankans dispute that fact..similarly people who spoke proto Tamil which later developed into Tamil in India had been living for thousands of years in Sri Lanka..the newly arrived Prakrit people demolished their temples and civilisation and replaced it with Buddhist one..it is a historical fact...it is beyond logic to believe that there was no civilisation in an island which is just 22 kms away from TN before the arrival of Prakrit speaking people.
 
.
People who spoke Prakrit which later developed into Sinhalese migrated to Sri Lanka and it is a historical fact..not even Sri lankans dispute that fact..similarly people who spoke proto Tamil which later developed into Tamil in India had been living for thousands of years in Sri Lanka..the newly arrived Prakrit people demolished their temples and civilisation and replaced it with Buddhist one..it is a historical fact...it is beyond logic to believe that there was no civilisation in an island which is just 22 kms away from TN before the arrival of Prakrit speaking people.


Nothing you say proves that the Sinhalese came from India. Because the Sinhalese identity and the Sinhalese language developed entirely in the island. That is, they are native and unique to Sri Lanka. The Sinhalese people never existed in India and the Sinhalese language was never spoken in India.

In contrast, Tamil is native to Southern India. That is where it developed and flourished. The island of Sri Lanka had NOTHING to do with its development, its literature and history. Tamil is alien to Sri Lanka. It is not native to the island.

There is no evidence whatsoever of people speaking "proto Tamil which later developed into Tamil in India had been living for thousands of years in Sri Lanka." Pulling stuff out of the air doesn't count as history.

Buddhism arrived in Sri Lanka long after Prakirt speaking settlers arrived and set up their civilisation. You are clueless.

There is no evidence of any ancient Tamil civilisation flourishing in Sri Lanka. Zero evidence. Nothing to show for it at all. Tamils are relatively recent immigrants to Sri Lanka, the vast majority are remnants of the Chola invasions.
 
.
Nothing you say proves that the Sinhalese came from India. Because the Sinhalese identity and the Sinhalese language developed entirely in the island. That is, they are native and unique to Sri Lanka. The Sinhalese people never existed in India and the Sinhalese language was never spoken in India.

In contrast, Tamil is native to Southern India. That is where it developed and flourished. The island of Sri Lanka had NOTHING to do with its development, its literature and history. Tamil is alien to Sri Lanka. It is not native to the island.

There is no evidence whatsoever of people speaking "proto Tamil which later developed into Tamil in India had been living for thousands of years in Sri Lanka." Pulling stuff out of the air doesn't count as history.

Buddhism arrived in Sri Lanka long after Prakirt speaking settlers arrived and set up their civilisation. You are clueless.

There is no evidence of any ancient Tamil civilisation flourishing in Sri Lanka. Zero evidence. Nothing to show for it at all. Tamils are relatively recent immigrants to Sri Lanka, the vast majority are remnants of the Chola invasions.
When did Prakrit speaking people arrive in SL ?your Mahavamsa clearly says you were not natives of SL but came from India..the matter closes there..before your arrival definitely Dravidian people must have been living there..how could someone not discover an island which is just 20kms away from their coast.
 
.
excellent article... speaks what is suppressed by the sangh "historians".

though it doesn't speak much of destruction of buddhist constructions... maybe intention of article was focus on hindu kings vs hindu structures.

ights between Dharmic kings was akin to fights within the Family for the inheritance of the ancestral property while the wars with the Islamic rulers is akin to a local goon breaking into your home to steal your wealth and occupying your home. There is a huge difference.

aap karein toh pyar, hum karein toh dash dash dash??

Most of the Islamic rulers brought their own language, culture, administrators to replace the local ones which resulted in natives losing not only culture/language/religion but also their Jobs.

not true... for example...
Miyan Tansen was born as Tanna Mishra, in 1520. He was a disciple of Swami Haridas and later became disciple of Hazrat Muhammad Ghaus (Gwalior ). He was a court musician with the prince of Mewar and later was recruited by Akbar as his court musician.

Raja Birbal, a poor Hindu Brahmin Maheshdas was appointed to the court of Akbar for his intelligence, and became the court jester. The name Raja Birbal was given by the Emperor. Birbal’s duties in Akbar’s court were mostly military and administrative. He was also a poet and his collections under the pen name “Brahma” are preserved in Bharatpur Museum. Raja Birbal died in battle, in an attempt to subdue unrest amongst Afghani tribes in Northwest India.

Raja Todar Mal, a Hindu Khatri was Akbar’s finance minister, who from 1560 onwards overhauled the revenue system in the kingdom. Raja Man Singh Raja Man Singh, the prince of Amber was a trusted general in Akbar’s army and was the grandson of Akbar’s father-in-law Bharmal.

Raja Man Singh was the foremost (7000 Mansabdari) and ablest among Akbar’s military commanders and assisted Akbar in many fronts including holding off advancing Hakim (Akbar’s half-brother) in Lahore. He was also the Mughal viceroy of Afghanistan, led campaigns in Bihar, Orissa, Deccan and was also the viceroy of Bengal.

source - Navratnas of Akbar (9 Gems) - General Knowledge Today
 
.
When did Prakrit speaking people arrive in SL ?your Mahavamsa clearly says you were not natives of SL but came from India..the matter closes there..before your arrival definitely Dravidian people must have been living there..how could someone not discover an island which is just 20kms away from their coast.

Why don't you go and read a bit about Sri Lankan history before pulling stuff out of the air?

The Sinhalese are native to Sri Lanka.

If you have any evidence whatsoever of Sinhalese language speakers in India or Sinhalese kingdoms in India please do share. You won't find any, because the Sinhalese language and the Sinhalese people are native to Sri Lanka. Both the language and the people are unique to the island - unlike Tamil.


The Mahavamsa was written in Pali, not Sinhalese. The Tamils (Damilas) are clearly seen as the invaders. Where does the Mahavamsa mention the Sinhalese language or the Sinhalese people as coming from India?

There is no such thing as "Dravidian people"

And there is no evidence of any Dravidian language being spoken in Sri Lanka prior to the arrival of Prakrit.

Tamil fantasy stories aren't going to fly sorry.

"the wars with the Islamic rulers is akin to a local goon breaking into your home to steal your wealth and occupying your home."

Well, that's what the Tamils did in Sri Lanka. They broke into the home of the Sinhalese (from Tamil Nadu), stole their wealth and occupied Sinhalese land.
 
. . .
Why don't you go and read a bit about Sri Lankan history before pulling stuff out of the air?

The Sinhalese are native to Sri Lanka.

If you have any evidence whatsoever of Sinhalese language speakers in India or Sinhalese kingdoms in India please do share. You won't find any, because the Sinhalese language and the Sinhalese people are native to Sri Lanka.


The Mahavamsa was written in Pali, not Sinhalese. The Tamils (Damilas) are clearly seen as the invaders.

There is no such thing as "Dravidian people"

And there is no evidence of any Dravidian language being spoken in Sri Lanka prior to the arrival of Prakrit.

Tamil fantasy stories aren't going to fly sorry.
You fool.. can't you understand plain English? Sinhalese is native to Sri Lanka..no doubt
.but its mother Prakrit is Indian..bigots like you just to take away the rights of Tamils over Sri Lanka are trying to distort history..the good thing about srinlankann history is their religious books themselves mention that they are not native..a king called some vijaya or veshya arrived with his army in Sri Lanka from Bengal or orissa and established his kingdom there..no matter however much you bark present day Sinhalese ancestors are not natives to Sri Lanka (every historian admits this ) and Tamils or Dravidian speaking tribes were the original inhabitants of Sri Lanka.
 
.
Rooto mat. Aap be is parivaar ke sadhasya hai. Ghar waapas ajawo. Aap ke liye dwar kula hua hai.:enjoy:

main aa sakta hoon lekin sadhvi saraswati meri dulhan honin chahiye. :azn:

kya cheez hai... :smitten:

sadhvi_010315-1.jpg
 
.
Pls read proper history. Tamils are natives in Srilanka. Sinhalese came from Odisha (India).
Are you mad? The SInhalese originated in SL....even your mahabharata and many many hindu scriptures had identified SL as Sinhala...

Between the majority of Tamils were brought largely to the north by the Dutch for coffee and tobacco plantations
 
.
.
You fool.. can't you understand plain English? Sinhalese is native to Sri Lanka..no doubt
.but its mother Prakrit is Indian..bigots like you just to take away the rights of Tamils over Sri Lanka are trying to distort history..the good thing about srinlankann history is their religious books themselves mention that they are not native..a king called some vijaya or veshya arrived with his army in Sri Lanka from Bengal or orissa and established his kingdom there..no matter however much you bark present day Sinhalese ancestors are not natives to Sri Lanka (every historian admits this ) and Tamils or Dravidian speaking tribes were the original inhabitants of Sri Lanka.


LMAO!!!! Now you are saying that "Sinhalese is native to Sri Lanka.. no doubt"

What an about turn... go and read what you wrote in earlier posts on this thread.

If anyone is stupid here it is YOU. This is what happens when you peddle BS and get called out for it.


Don't call me a bigot... go and weep for the Muslims murdered in India for being Muslim or eating beef, for the hundreds of millions of Dalits who are oppressed, the Christians who are attacked, the women who are burned alive after being accused of being witches, the tribals who are raped and beaten etc etc. Your own country is a cesspool and you point fingers at others?

No matter what you say the Sinhalese are native to Sri Lanka... they never came from India and the Sinhalese language never existed in India.

If we go by your reasoning you are from Africa. Your ancestors came from there. You are not native to India.

"Tamils or Dravidian speaking tribes were the original inhabitants of Sri Lanka"

Absolutely zero evidence for any such claim. Zero evidence. Nothing to show for it.

Tamils have always been invaders to Sri Lanka leaving a trail of death, destruction and looting.
 
. .
.bigots like you just to take away the rights of Tamils over Sri Lanka are trying to distort history.
what are the rights that have been taken away from the tamils in SL?

the good thing about srinlankann history is their religious books themselves mention that they are not native..a king called some vijaya or veshya arrived with his army in Sri Lanka from Bengal or orissa and established his kingdom there.
I bet you re referring to mahavamsa. To begin with it is NOT a religious book rather a historical prose. Yes mahavamsa speaks about a vijaya prince, but modern day historians and even early historians did not believe it for the obvious lack of evidence. It is normally considered that the mahavamsa's initial part is mere mythology and pure fiction..

For your information Sinhala consciousness had been developed much earlier than tamil consciousness. For example sinhalese identified themselves as a sinhalese much earlier before the tamils identified themselvs as tamils.

no matter however much you bark present day Sinhalese ancestors are not natives to Sri Lanka
The sinhalese are a nation formed by the mixing of the native people and the immigrants. Actually present day sinhalese are much fairer than their ancestors who used to be extremely dark.

Tamils or Dravidian speaking tribes were the original inhabitants of Sri Lank
Any source ?
 
.
do you know the islami economic system and economic obligations upon muslims??

You mean the concept of not charging and/or receiving Interest ? How is it related to "Jizya" (tax to be paid by non-Muslim subjects)?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom