Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
do you really believe the CCP bot that scraped the news from some dubious website?The bill does sound rather draconian one would hope it doesn't pass through.
That makes sense.do you really believe the CCP bot that scraped the news from some dubious website?
Here is the full text of the proposed bill https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23697944-restrict-act-final-text
First, VPN isn't going to be outlawed by the bill. The bill only applies to Covered transactions as it relates to covered entities.
Covered entities = Foreign adversaries
Covered transactions = Classified National Security data, personal data and critical infrastructure
The bill will outlaw TikTok and any other firms with links to the Chinese government. it will also outlaw devices with over 1m active units in the US that is produced or sold by an entity with links to the CCP.
no, but how you use VPN will bear an underlying legal risk once the bill becomes lawVPN isn't going to be outlawed by the bill.
no, there is no mention of VPN in the bill.no, but how you use VPN will bear an underlying legal risk once the bill becomes law
VPN is a specific type of technology, no mentioning of it doesn't mean the bill doesn't cover it.no, there is no mention of VPN in the bill.
sure if the CPC make VPN software or if the gateway is in Zhongnanhai basement it's use and sale in the US will be outlawed by the bill. There is no ban on VPN use, even suggesting it is beyond preposterous.VPN is a specific type of technology, no mentioning of it doesn't mean the bill doesn't cover it.
That's not what I mean. the bill tries to criminalize the act of using technology to access banned sites/apps, that is where VPN is includedsure if the CPC make VPN software or if the gateway is in China it's use and sale in the US will be outlawed by the bill. There is no ban on VPN use, even suggesting it is beyond preposterous.
If you are accessing that site by whatever means then the VPN piece comes in - unless you use VPN to access a banned site you are not violating ANYTHING if you use a VPN.That's not what I mean. the bill tries to criminalize the act of using technology to access banned sites/apps, that is where VPN is included
Are you quoting the right person here? The gun analogy is exactly my point.If you are accessing that site by whatever means then the VPN piece comes in - unless you use VPN to access a banned site you are not violating ANYTHING if you use a VPN.
Your claim is as disingenuous as someone claim guns are being banned because a law is passed that says using guns to kill innocent people is a criminal act.
any day now..
no, but how you use VPN will bear an underlying legal risk once the bill becomes law
If you are accessing that site by whatever means then the VPN piece comes in - unless you use VPN to access a banned site you are not violating ANYTHING if you use a VPN.
Yes - your point isn’t applicable because you are stating that all guns will be banned because murder is banned. That is not how it works.Are you quoting the right person here? The gun analogy is exactly my point.
see post #19
Yes - your point isn’t applicable because you are stating that all guns will be banned because murder is banned. That is not how it works.
What is the point of using VPN if you're not trying to access a banned site?If you are accessing that site by whatever means then the VPN piece comes in - unless you use VPN to access a banned site you are not violating ANYTHING if you use a VPN.
Your claim is as disingenuous as someone claim guns are being banned because a law is passed that says using guns to kill innocent people is a criminal act.