What's new

VIEW: Jihadism and the military in Pakistan

In other words, Jihad doesn't translate to war. It's the purification of oneself - a battle within yourself to attain humanism.

If you are persuaded by that, it's up to you - but I would seriously doubt your sanity if after reading this thread and so many others like it, you have concluded that "jihad" is some benign concept.
Do you really think that if Jihad was about attaining Humanism, Muslims, especially Pakistani Muslims would be where they are??

No, reality is that to Islamists in Pakistan, "Jihad" means dead Hindus, jews and Christians and really dead anybody who will not submit. After all, can you point to even one instance in which "Jihad" is "purification" and someone's blood has not been shed?

What part of Islam will "take over" did you not get?
 
.
VIEW: Jihadism and the military in Pakistan — II —A R Siddiqi



The Pakistan Army gained some tactical advantage in the operation to bring the national propaganda machine feverishly into action

Under Ayub as Commander in Chief, the Pakistan Army might well have been a page taken from the pre-independence, colonial army — the same uniform, same mess culture and same language (English for officers and a sort of Roman Urdu for others). An officer’s personal deportment was judged nearly as much by his social standing and mess culture as by his professional calibre and proficiency. The study of military history served as a plus point in his annual confidential reports (ACRs).

Ayub’s first five years in command might have been the halcyon days of professionalism and force modernisation. Kashmir had nevertheless cast a shadow, long and dark, on the psyche of the rank and file. For the high command an uneasy ceasefire line (CFL) and unnecessary political/diplomatic exploitation of the Kashmir issue by the civilian leadership, underlined the role of the army as the principal guarantor of national security.

Internationally, the army chief, General Ayub, emerged as Pakistan’s man of the moment — of ‘destiny’ — as he had envisioned himself to be. The US state department and the Pentagon looked up to him as the architect of the US-Pak relationship supported by SEATO, the Baghdad Pact (later CENTO) and mutual security agreements.

The military image under Ayub, essentially secular, stayed much the same as the pre-independence colonial army’s. Mess and club bars were open and the ‘koi hai?’ (is anybody there?) generation, though diminishing, still dominated the middle and senior cadres of the officer corps.

Officers (majors and above) and JCOs still wore the British crown on their badges of rank. The word ‘royal’, where authorised, was prefixed to various regiments and services (e.g. Royal Pakistan Service Corps, Royal Pakistan Medical Corps, etc) and the navy and air force respectively were known as the Royal Pakistan Navy (RPN) and Royal Pakistan Air Force (RPAF).

In 1956, Pakistan shed its dominion status and became an Islamic republic to drop the symbols and insignias of British royalty. The British crown was replaced by the Islamic crescent and star. Uniforms, by and large, remained much the same, from the workday khaki to the blue patrols and monkey jackets, etc.

On October 7, 1958, President Iskander Mirza put the country under martial law with Ayub as the CMLA. Ayub embarked on the secular path, dropping even the prefix Islamic from the Republic of Pakistan. Between 1958-1964, the jihadi theme played out in a low-key manner in the army without exactly deviating from it as the dominant note on Pakistan’s jihadi scale.

In October/November 1964, a popular uprising took place in Kashmir, with its centre of gravity in Srinagar and vibrations across the state, in the aftermath of the theft of the sacred hair of the Prophet (PBUH). The uprising took an aggressively violent turn when the Indian government called paramilitary militias and elements of the Indian army to aid civil power.

Waiting for just such an opportunity, the Pakistan Army sprang into action in the Neelum Valley at the brigade level under Brigadier Khilji. The operation was little more than a flash in the pan. After a week or so of some hectic engagements, it came to a close as abruptly as it had begun. In psy-war terms, however, it revived with a vengeance the muted jihadi mantra and the resolve to have it out with India once and for all.

The year 1965 opened with Ayub’s pyrrhic victory in the presidential elections. His rival happened to be Quaid-e-Azam’s sister and lifelong companion, Mohtarma Fatima Jinnah. This electoral exercise was the shame of a severely limited electoral process with just 80,000 voters — 40,000 from each wing. Massive rigging of the ballot reduced it to a complete farce.

Ayub needed nothing less than a military victory to live down the electoral blemish and shame. He initiated a divisional size operation in the howling, swampy desert of the Rann of Kutch. The Pakistan Army gained some tactical advantage in the operation to bring the national propaganda machine feverishly into action. Besides, it served to glorify the young officers and their men as mujahids after Mohammad bin Qasim, the first soldier of Islam to have invaded Sindh and defeated the ruler Raja Dahir (712 AD). Sindh was promptly named Babul Islam (gateway to Islam) as a prelude to the re-conquest of Hindu India by the Muslims.

From Kutch onwards, Islamic jihad became the marching tune of the Pakistan Army — a wakeup call for the muhajid (Pakistani solider): “Ai Mard-i-Mujahid jaag zara abb waqt-e-shahadat aa pohancha” (O soldier, it is time to wake up because the time for martyrdom has come upon us). There was no stopping the Pakistan Army after the Rann of Kutch. Its strategic goal was to impose a humiliating defeat on India. “Allah ke waade ka Mujahid ko yaqeen hai. Woh Fathe-musin, Fathe mobin hai. (The mujahid is assured of Allah’s promise to grant him final victory).

Between May and August 1965, India-Pakistan relations went through a dizzying rollercoaster ride and mind-boggling highs and lows — from a deceptive truce in Kutch to a sudden general flare-up in September. In the first week of August, Operation Gibraltar, a guerrilla type effort, was launched by army regulars masquerading as guerrilla mujahideen fighters. The operation collapsed even on the launching pad.

It was followed impulsively by a divisional size (12 Infantry Division) operation Grand Slam supported by couple of tank regiments (mainly the French AMX’s) and 4 Corps artillery.

What with overoptimistic planning and a mystifying change of command (Major-General Agha Yhaya Khan vice Major-General Akhtar Malik), the grand slam failed to mobilise the enormous firepower (four corps artillery) and mobility (two tank regiments) that the two commanders — Akhter Malik/Yahya Khan — had at their disposal. It had been tardily heading on towards the Indian garrison town, Akhnoor, when India struck all along the international line (West Pakistan) to initiate the first undeclared ‘treacherous and cowardly’ general war on September 6, 1965 against Pakistan.

(To be continued)

The writer is a retired brigadier of the Pakistan Army

Assalam alaikum

Ur arguments r getting weaker accusing zia of making it islamic republic and bringing the jihadi themes.

TARIQ
 
.
In other words, Jihad doesn't translate to war. It's the purification of oneself - a battle within yourself to attain humanism.

If you are persuaded by that, it's up to you - but I would seriously doubt your sanity if after reading this thread and so many others like it, you have concluded that "jihad" is some benign concept.
Do you really think that if Jihad was about attaining Humanism, Muslims, especially Pakistani Muslims would be where they are??

No, reality is that to Islamists in Pakistan, "Jihad" means dead Hindus, jews and Christians and really dead anybody who will not submit. After all, can you point to even one instance in which "Jihad" is "purification" and someone's blood has not been shed?

What part of Islam will "take over" did you not get?
Jihad also means war against kafirs by weapons and one Jihad is fighting against Nafs when a Muslim land is attacked by Kafirs Jihad with weapons becomes farz on every Muslims where ever he is living

---------- Post added at 11:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:41 AM ----------

Islam is Islam and whole Islam will take over not just a single part and things which are allowed in Islam will be allowed and things which are banned in Islam will not be allowed at any cost even though some people will cry but it will be of no use
 
.
Jihad also means war against kafirs by weapons and one Jihad is fighting against Nafs when a Muslim land is attacked by Kafirs Jihad with weapons becomes farz on every Muslims where ever he is living

---------- Post added at 11:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:41 AM ----------

Islam is Islam and whole Islam will take over not just a single part and things which are allowed in Islam will be allowed and things which are banned in Islam will not be allowed at any cost even though some people will cry but it will be of no use

Which is the lowest form of Jihad.Btw.
Perhaps if you look at history and the context in which the prophet declared Jihad.. you would have a better understanding..

Major battles:
Badr was a preemptive strike to prevent the Quraish from mobilizing further to attack.. which they were.
another preemptive strike was carried out against the Banu-Salim tribe.
Uhad was defensive..
Ghazwa Khandaq.. defensive..

On which context then.. would you justify the 65 war? similar to which battle? Uhad??
 
. .
I sense an apologetic stance by some Pakistani members in regard to the pakistan Army's adherence to the ideology of Jihad. The proclivity towards this holy ideology stems from Islam and after all Pakistan IS an Islamic Republic, so why should Pakistan Army not carry an overt zeal towards Jihad?? To all those who think that Jihad is a sensitive topic or a myopic view point in todays world have already fallen prey to the western propaganda to malign Islam.

Jihad is one of the 5th pillar of Islam and is obligatory for ALL Muslims, what to take of the army of an Islamic State.

Besides Islam, from antiquity warriors have longed and envisaged of a higher pedestrian in the here after if they fall in battle. Be it Elesium or Vallhala, or a special place in heaven for the Muslim warrior. The concept is very much the same. i.e to fight in the cause of Allah in defense of righteousness and defiance of tyranny.

It is precisely the lack of the true spirit of Jihad that the Ummah is suffering and not other wise.

Pakistan Army Zindabad Pakistan Paindabad :pakistan:
 
.
Which is the lowest form of Jihad.Btw.
Perhaps if you look at history and the context in which the prophet declared Jihad.. you would have a better understanding..

Major battles:
Badr was a preemptive strike to prevent the Quraish from mobilizing further to attack.. which they were.
another preemptive strike was carried out against the Banu-Salim tribe.
Uhad was defensive..
Ghazwa Khandaq.. defensive..

On which context then.. would you justify the 65 war? similar to which battle? Uhad??
Sir only first three wars were fought in defence in all the other wars Muslims attacked first and if Muslims land in attacked its a defensive war and its farz on every Muslim to fight those who have attacked
 
.
Assalam alaikum

These ppl r not apologetic about jihad actually they r ashamed of being born in muslim families but can't acknowledge it.

TARIQ
 
.
Assalam alaikum

ghazwa tabook will be considered a jihaad or not?

TARIQ

Preemptive strike.. The Byzantines were reportedly preparing to lead an assault on Muslims.
There was no Attack for the sake of attack.

I sense an apologetic stance by some Pakistani members in regard to the pakistan Army's adherence to the ideology of Jihad. The proclivity towards this holy ideology stems from Islam and after all Pakistan IS an Islamic Republic, so why should Pakistan Army not carry an overt zeal towards Jihad?? To all those who think that Jihad is a sensitive topic or a myopic view point in todays world have already fallen prey to the western propaganda to malign Islam.

Jihad is one of the 5th pillar of Islam and is obligatory for ALL Muslims, what to take of the army of an Islamic State.

Besides Islam, from antiquity warriors have longed and envisaged of a higher pedestrian in the here after if they fall in battle. Be it Elesium or Vallhala, or a special place in heaven for the Muslim warrior. The concept is very much the same. i.e to fight in the cause of Allah in defense of righteousness and defiance of tyranny.

It is precisely the lack of the true spirit of Jihad that the Ummah is suffering and not other wise.

Pakistan Army Zindabad Pakistan Paindabad :pakistan:

Mashallah.
Please define the word Jihad for us..


Sir only first three wars were fought in defence in all the other wars Muslims attacked first and if Muslims land in attacked its a defensive war and its farz on every Muslim to fight those who have attacked

The Muslims attacked to prevent an attack..
when did they attack for the sake of attack?

The second part of your post is pointless and irrelevant to my question.
 
.
Jihad is one of the 5th pillar of Islam and is obligatory for ALL Muslims, what to take of the army of an Islamic State.

Is it now? Perhaps, since you seem knowledgeable about Islam and all that, lets us what are the 5 pillars of islam?
 
.
Come on God of war - you came so strong I thought you knew what you were talking about - come and tell us the 5 pillars of islam that are farz obligatory and tell us which of these 5 is Jihad?
 
.
God of war

Oye, Brave Jihadi Muzloum - don't tell me we got us a runaway - The super hero Jihadi turns out is a runaway, cause he doesn't even know the 5 pillars of islam and can't tell us which of these 5 is jihad --- No wonder the jihadi army could never beat those rat and snake worshipers.
 
.
Muse, I seriously doubt your mental state, I mean, can't you argue without using offensive words? I wonder why is there discrimination, a senior guy or a new member says something like this, *Banned*, you criticize Islam, Pakistan Army, use offensive words, still you're here. Double standards prevail here in PDF!
 
. .
We don't make stuff up - Quaid is very clear,

Pakistan is a Muslim country not a Islamist country. But of course I will grant you that is exactly the struggle, My money is on the Muslims - Islamicans to arabia:cheers:

Sir sorry to burst your bubble once again but you hardly making any sense...even if u are mission to spread propoganda you should atleast make sense.....
there is no difference in a country being muslim or islamist or islamic....there terms are just in your brain and u keep making news terms everyday .....now u came u with islamican:lol:

Pakistan is an islamic country based on islamic ideology where muslims live...i dont know what going in your brain right now that u say a muslim country is different from islamic country.......when u wanna buy car u go to the showroom do u tell sir i need car but it shouldnt be four wheeler?all cars are four wheelers....or you eat mangoes but u tell your friends you ate mangoes but not fruits......there are just hallucinations you are having and are with out any substance and considering all your post you hardly have audience with one or two secular fascists thanking and you think you are doing a good job but thats not the case.you are wasting your time spreading hate against state institutions.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom