@Parul will have peaceful sleep tonight
I have peaceful sleep every night
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Parul will have peaceful sleep tonight
This piece of trash is already debunked.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/strate...kistan-chinas-iron-brother-9.html#post4321574
Developereo bhai, I know it's tough accepting the facts if they fail to paint a rosy picture. You haven't brought out any substantial issues backed by facts in your link. What has been written in the The Express Tribune is mostly spot on.
Isn't it a fact that Sino Pak trade is a measly $13 billion - the maximum since 1955? We're not just talking about the period 2000-2013, but the last many decades when there was no WOT.
Isn't it a fact that China's investments in Pakistan are less than $1 billion?
How come you have a trade surplus with the US of A as well as the EU but the opposite with China which you claim a relationship which is 'higher than the mountains, deeper than........' etc etc?
Why is China building the Gwadar Port?
The only assistance that China is giving to Pakistan is in the military sphere. This is primarily to keep India's attention diverted. The bottom line is that China is using Pakistan as its proxy to protect its Southern flank.
improving diplomatic and commercial relations between China and India.
Secondly, although Beijing has appeared as a far less demanding ally than the United States, it has not replaced Washington has an aid-provider.
So where does Pakistan figure in the great geo-strategic game that China is playing for advancing its own national interests? Not much except providing territory for building this infrastructure.
Because it is factually inaccurate. Its only use is to soothe Indian and certain Western egos.
The article focuses on economic cooperation between China and Pakistan, the article correctly pointed out that US beats CHina when it comes to investing money.
However, ofcourse, when it comes to geopolitics, China is a bigger support than the US.
I think writer misunderstood US-AID as FDI in Pakistan.
I dont think so.
The article focuses on economic cooperation between China and Pakistan, the article correctly pointed out that US beats CHina when it comes to investing money. However, ofcourse, when it comes to geopolitics, China is a bigger support than the US.
So, yet another post full of the usual arrogant pontification without any actual substance...
I am still waiting to you to defend the specific points in this trash article which I pointed out were blatantly false. Your personal attacks only confirm the fact that you are unable to respond factually.
The reference to the NYT is warranted because YOU quite obviously missed the irony that the author praises US investment while berating Chinese investment. Meanwhile, he ignores the fact that US sponsored instability in Baluchistan caused the Chinese to abort their investments.
You sound angry - No personal attack was intended and you should not take it as one - Regardless of who is sponsoring what in B'stan, fact remains that US is the biggest market for Pakistani exports and that US is the biggest investor in Pakistan -- now I agree that this fact is unpleasant, but it is what it is.
The substance of the message from Mcleoud road is that if you want a genuinely deep and broad relationship with China, you have to get serious about trade, and since it's from Mcleoud road, they want pakistani bank representation in China, be sure of that one.