1, getting something is so simple for viet namese liars: just making a presentation on a conference to say that that's mine.
san francisco conference:
(1)who was south viet nam? in 1951, it was supposed to be the french daddy who represented its viet nam boy.
where is north viet nam? why it cannot attend the conference? wow, not get an invitation and not even being recognized? haha.
(2)south viet nam has been dead, your north viet namese liar should not make use of such a corpse in this way, even a corpse should have its own dignity. so
let south viet nam come back, PRC would have a little interests on talking with its argument, otherwise,
please read the diplomatic letter sent by your viet nam PM phan in 1956 again and again.
(3)PRC was absent for san francisco conference, USSR attended but refused to sign on the treaty.
2,
words changed in your inconsistent liar network:
according to geneva accords ----->> After Geneva Accords 1954
please continue to tell lies on historical facts only your viet namese liar knows:
but france and china had no formal diplomatic relationship in 1954.
Base on your analogy, Han, Ming, Yuan, Qing dynasties were dead too.
![Mrgreen :D :D](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/mrgreen.gif)