What's new

Vietnam fooling no one in maritime dispute

1, getting something is so simple for viet namese liars: just making a presentation on a conference to say that that's mine.
san francisco conference:
(1)who was south viet nam? in 1951, it was supposed to be the french daddy who represented its viet nam boy.
where is north viet nam? why it cannot attend the conference? wow, not get an invitation and not even being recognized? haha.
(2)south viet nam has been dead, your north viet namese liar should not make use of such a corpse in this way, even a corpse should have its own dignity. so
let south viet nam come back, PRC would have a little interests on talking with its argument, otherwise,
please read the diplomatic letter sent by your viet nam PM phan in 1956 again and again.
(3)PRC was absent for san francisco conference, USSR attended but refused to sign on the treaty.

2,
words changed in your inconsistent liar network:
according to geneva accords ----->> After Geneva Accords 1954

please continue to tell lies on historical facts only your viet namese liar knows:
but france and china had no formal diplomatic relationship in 1954.

Base on your analogy, Han, Ming, Yuan, Qing dynasties were dead too. :D
 
Actually, I agree with you. Without Viet Nam, we will lose so much pleasure.
A world is like a circus, so, how can it be so without a clown ?

China is typical clown, 1950 China jumped to Russia Stalin to counter " paper tiger US ", 1972 China jumped to US Carter to counter " Northern bear ". and now, again China jumped to Russia Putin to counter USA.

China do do her good job as black chess on policy table..
 
China was always begged by superpowers to be their friends, not like a true clown Vietnam who seeks the best servant position in different groups.
China is typical clown, 1950 China jumped to Russia Stalin to counter " paper tiger US ", 1972 China jumped to US Carter to counter " Northern bear ". and now, again China jumped to Russia Putin to counter USA.

China do do her good job as black chess on policy table..
 
Back
Top Bottom