What's new

Vietnam Defence Forum

This is the best part of the Eurocopter, its lethal !!!!

View attachment 335339
who has more curves, the lady or eurocopter tiger? :enjoy:

eurocopter_tiger_arh_armed_reconnaissance_helicopter.jpg
 
.
Radar guided Redut P35 Missile, nearly as old as the Army´s T55 Tanks, but is still as deadly as hell. range 500km, speed 1.4 Mach, 1,000kg conventional warhead. the missile system was delivered by the USSR during Sino-Vietnam war, can blow 100,000 ton aircraft carrier up with a single hit.


tim-hieu-suc-manh-cua-lu-doan-679_8043550.png



redut_2702084.jpg

Has this ever been used?
 
. . . . .
Nope.

It was designed to solely engage and destroy the US carrier battle group. I'm pretty sure we haven't had a World War 3, so no, it only acts as a deterrent weapon system.

This might sound silly, but why won't the government invest in the Truong Sa and Hoang Sa project if we need a deterrent?
 
.
Do you know meaning of R&D phase at industrial level?

But you CPC chaps never able to understand this as you guys always done stealing.


@hoangsa74 cousins doing very decent job in R&D and quality control.

That is not sea hugging but sea kissing( new tech. developed by CPC chaps).



Seems like BrahMos quality control is better than Yakhont, that's why in 50 tests of BrahMos , that always hit the target.

Even after being sub standard of Yakhont. Right @hoangsa74? :Rofl:

This is the reason India use Indian/Israeli build seekers in BrahMos.




But India Japan openly backing Vietnam as leader of ASEAN. :/
LOL, r&d already speaks for yourself. Your nirbhay is still in r n d phase, it's not even a working one yet.

And what is cpc? something to do with china? This thread has nothing to do with china so stay on topic. this thread is about super indian weapons and what they can do to "stop" a Chinese take over of the spratly. So far, no indian weapon is a game changer that can tip the tide of the battle for the viet in the spratly.

I repeat again, yakhont in the viet's inventory is 40, Brahmos is 0. The worst thing is that not even one country in south east asia ghettos has bought any indian made weapons,...but they have bought Chinese weapons. india can tout how superior indian weapons all she can,..but at the end of the day it's up to the customers if they take those indian claims seriously or not. ...and so far NO customers of indian weapons. ..even with a 600 million loan shark.
 
.
This might sound silly, but why won't the government invest in the Truong Sa and Hoang Sa project if we need a deterrent?
You mean tthe Truong Sa and Hoang Sa submarines? The ones that were made by civilians?
 
. .
The Legend of the Vietnam War’s Mystery Fighter Ace
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...tnam-wars-mystery-fighter-ace-17747?page=show

solsticemigsmall_7633859414_0.jpg

Col. Nguyen Tomb — or “Toon” — is one of the names immortalized in military aviation, like Baron von Richthofen and Eddie Rickenbacker.

I first encountered Tomb when I was 10 years old, playing Chuck Yeager’s Air Combat on my dad’s computer. In one mission, you fly against the Vietnamese ace, infamous for having scored 13 air-to-air kills.

Tomb was the only Vietnamese pilot named in the game, and I was curious, like many others before and since, to learn more about this mysterious aviator. The top-scoring American pilots in Vietnam, by comparison, had only five kills each.

On paper, the air war over Vietnam should have been a grossly one-sided contest. The U.S. Air Force and Navy, the strongest air arms in the world, opposed the jets of the Vietnam People’s Air Force, averaging 70 warplanes in the early years of the air war, and peaking at 200 near the end.

It was far from one-sided. The Vietnamese received extensive technical assistance, training and replacement aircraft from Russia and China. They also drew upon decades of experience fighting materially stronger opponents.

Vietnamese MiG fighters launched hit-and-run attacks on U.S. attack formations that flew on predictable schedules, inflicting heavy losses even on supersonic F-105 Thunderchief bombers. Ground-based radars guided Vietnamese pilots into perfect ambush positions.

American aviators, in turn, had rules of engagement prohibiting them from firing missiles at unidentified aircraft or attacking enemy airfields. The Vietnamese ultimately lost more aircraft than they shot down in air-to-air combat, but they forced many air raids to abort mission and ditch their bombs.

NSA signals intelligence units spying on Vietnamese radio communications appear to be responsible for Tomb’s rise to fame. An NSA report made public through the Freedom Of Information Act, tells us how it began.

…the NSA could identify each North Vietnamese pilot by his own unique call sign suffix […] SIGINT analysts became familiar with many of the unseen North Vietnamese flyers and built case histories on individual pilots, their ranks, organizations, number of missions flown, even their combat records.

This is how they discovered Tomb, “an airborne outlaw in the image of a Wild West gunslinger” and “the first SIGINT-confirmed enemy ace.” To clarify, an “ace” is a pilot who has shot down at least five enemy aircraft.

In the NSA’s account, Tomb was such a serious threat that the commander of the U.S. 7th Air Force was “obsessed” with shooting him down, and the NSA alerted the general everytime Tomb was scheduled to fly. The report concluded with a detailed account of how the “Red Baron of North Vietnam” “single-handedly wrecked a strategic bombing mission.”

A photo also circulated of a MiG-17 numbered 3020 with over a half-dozen stars on its nose — each star representing an American plane shot down. This could only be the fighter of the infamous Tomb himself.

The MiG-17 “Fresco” evolved from the MiG-15 fighters flown extensively in the Korean War, featuring sharply swept back wings. It was a generation behind the F-4 Phantom, the top U.S. fighter of the time.

While the F-4 flew faster than Mach 2, the MiG-17 could not quite reach Mach 1 in level flight. And unlike the MiG-21 fighters in Vietnamese service, the MiG-17 couldn’t carry air-to-air missiles, relying instead on a heavy 37-millimeter and two 23-millimeter cannons. Nor did the plane have hydraulic controls, making it sluggish to handle at high speeds.

But despite these disadvantages, the MiG-17 was exceptionally maneuverable at slower speeds. Earlier in the conflict, the F-4 was plagued by its dependency on unreliable air-to-air missiles. If a MiG-17 closed into dogfighting range, it could easily out turn an F-4 and shoot it down — unless the Phantom pilot hit the throttle to disengage.

Another photo that made an impression depicted a slender MiG-21 fighter, technologically a close match for the Phantom. It was numbered 4326 and had 13 victory stars under the canopy. This too was thought to be Tomb’s fighter, because who else could have scored so many kills?

The Colonel’s Last Battle:

In 1972, the United States began Operation Linebacker, an intense aerial bombardment campaign against North Vietnam that lasted six months. On May 10, 11 North Vietnamese fighters and four F-4 Phantoms were shot down in a series of sharp engagements.

It was proving a good day for Navy Lt. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, and his back-seat radio intercept officer Lt. Junior Grade William “Irish” Driscoll.

Both were graduates of the Navy’s Top Gun school, which taught advanced air combat tactics — and they already had two kills to their names. As they flew their F-4J on a strike against the Hai Dong railyards, their formation came under attack by MiG-17s.

Cunningham turned sharply toward one and shot it down with a Sidewinder missile.

He then saw his wingman locked in a dogfight against eight MiG-17s. Several were on the tail of Cdr. Dwight Timm’s F-4. He got into firing position behind the 17s, but didn’t shoot because his heat-seeking Sidewinder missiles might have locked onto the hot twin engines of Timm’s Phantom.

“Break!” he barked at Timm. Timm complied with a sharp turn, giving Cunningham a clear shot for his second kill of the day.

The outnumbered F-4 pilots then disengaged, throttling up their engines to head for home.

Cunningham suddenly noticed a lone MiG-17 heading straight toward him. He decided to meet its approach — a nearly fatal mistake as the MiG-17 spat cannon shells at him in a head on pass.

Lacking a gun on his F-4, Cunningham swerved upwards.

The MiG-17 peeled up in pursuit — rolling over onto the Phantom’s tail. With only a short distance between them, Cunningham could see the number 3020 on the MiG.

He attempted to shake the nimble fighter with a rolling scissors maneuver, but the MiG pilot matched his Phantom’s every move.

The two aircraft burned up their energy in a series of tight turns, slowing further and further until the heavier Phantom was close to stalling.

This kind of low-speed knife-fighting was the MiG-17’s strength. Driscoll inquired nervously whether Cunningham shouldn’t abandon the fight — but Cunningham refused to give up.

Instead, he lit his afterburners, making the engine gulp fuel at a prodigious rate, and surged two miles ahead before turning around for another head on pass at the MiG, this time at an angle so the MiG couldn’t shoot back.

It didn’t work — the MiG latched immediately back on his tail.

So Cunningham disengaged and turned around a second time — but this time, as the MiG began to line up on his tail after the pass, he cut the throttle and hit the airbrakes. Denied thrust, the Phantom fell behind the MiG-17. But Cunningham’s fighter was too close for his missiles to lock onto the vulnerable MiG.

The MiG pilot rolled into a steep dive toward the ground, the heat from which would soon mask him from heat-seeking missiles.

As the MiG distanced itself from Cunningham, he fired a Sidewinder missile. It hit the MiG, which plummeted into the ground and exploded. There was no parachute in sight. Tomb had been defeated.

Shortly afterwards, an SA-2 surface-to-air missile hit Cunningham’s Phantom. Nursing his flaming fighter towards the coast, Cunningham and Driscoll ejected just over the water’s edge and were rescued at sea. They had shot down three fighters in one day, and had become the first U.S. aces in Vietnam.

Driscoll went on to work as an instructor at the Navy’s Top Gun school. Cunningham served 15 years as a Republican congressman for California before being jailed for corruption in 2005.

Legend and Myth:

As relations improved with Vietnam over the years, aviation historians began to inquire with Hanoi’s top pilots, seeking to learn more about the legendary Col. Tomb.

They all received the same reply — “Colonel who?”

None of the Vietnamese pilots had heard of Col. Tomb, and he was not in any of their records.

Tomb and “Toon” are not even Vietnamese names. (Some argue the NSA may have misheard the names “Tuan” or “Tonh.”) Most Vietnamese aces flew MiG-21s, not the older MiG-17s, and didn’t switch plane types back and forth.

Logically, there doesn’t seem to be any reason the Vietnamese air force would cover up its highest scoring ace — such an individual would have been highly celebrated. And other pilots lost in action had been commemorated, not erased from history.

Tomb wasn’t a legend. He was a myth.

But the Vietnamese disavowal didn’t put an end to the legend.

One theory was that Tomb was a Russian pilot. During the Korean War, Russian pilots had flown in Chinese and North Korean air force units. Thousands of Russian technical advisers assisted North Vietnamese forces during the Vietnam War. But post-war, no Russians have claimed to have flown in air-to-air combat in Vietnam.

A U.S. pilot, Col. Jack Broughton, claimed in his memoir Thud Ridge that he had seen a Russian pilot in the cockpit of an opposing MiG-19 with “blonde hair and blue eyes.” It seems quite a feat of perception.

There is one Russian credited with shooting down six American planes. But he was the commander of a surface-to-air missile battalion.

Another theory is that Tomb was actually two pilots — Din Tonh (hence “Toon”), and Dang Ngoc Ngu. The latter scored more aerial victories, while the former had a reputation as a maverick prone to lone wolf attacks. Supposedly, Din Tonh would sneak into formation alongside American fighters, waiting to see how long they took to notice his presence.

But both pilots flew MiG-21s, not MiG-17s, and neither were present for the air battle on May 10, 1972.

Another theory advanced by aviation historian Tom Cooper, a War Is Boring contributor, is that SIGINT picked up the call sign of Le Thanh Dao, a Vietnamese ace with six kills to his name, who was known to be flying on that day. But Le Thanh Dao flew a MiG-21, and was not shot down that day.

And what does the NSA report have to say about Tomb’s fate? “When the air war was at last winding down, Comrade Toon, decorated and promoted, was a forward ground controller, directing MiG reactions to U.S. air operations.”

So who was Cunningham’s opponent? Some argue he was a senior officer of the 923rd Fighter Regiment with the authority to ignore orders to disengage.

The Vietnamese air force claims he was a pilot named Nguyen Van Tho, and that he survived the loss of his plane — which doesn’t correspond to the explosion Cunningham witnessed.

The Real Col. Tomb:

To invert a popular saying — the Americans didn’t need to invent Colonel Tomb, because he already existed.

Nguyen Van Coc, Hanoi’s top-scoring ace, had nine air-to-air kills in his MiG-21. And the MiG-21 he flew? It was number 4326.

The 13 stars tallied on his plane included the victories of other pilots who had flown it, as per Vietnamese air force custom.

Nguyen Van Coc was 26 years old when he and a dozen other Vietnamese pilots trained in Russia in 1966 to operate the MiG-21 — the hottest ride in the Soviet inventory at the time. In his youth, his father and uncle were members of the Viet Minh and were killed by the French.

Van Coc was shot down before scoring his first kill on Jan. 2, 1967 in Operation Bolo, a U.S. aerial ambush. He went on to destroy an F-105 in an attack out of the sun on April 30, and then scored eight more kills through December 1969 using heat-seeking R-3 Atoll missiles.

Of nine victories, two were drones, and for the aircraft, six of the seven can be confirmed in U.S. records — making him the top-scoring pilot of the war no matter how you count it.

Van Coc was then pulled out of frontline service to focus on training the next generation of Vietnamese pilots, who were heavily engaged in the air battles of 1972. His protégé, Nguyen Doc Soat, went on to score six victories.

Another Vietnamese ace, Nguyen Van Bay, scored his seven kills flying the older, slower MiG-17.

His victims included Korean war ace Maj. James Kasler, and two Navy F-8 Crusaders — much more agile aircraft than the F-4.

He was one of the few pilots since World War II to successfully hit a U.S. Navy ship when he and his wingman Le Xuan Di bombed the USS Oklahoma City and USS Highbee, respectively. (Other attempted MiG attacks suffered heavy losses from naval SAMs.)

All three of these aces survived the war.

Van Coc retired as Chief Inspector of the Vietnamese air force in 2002, while Duc Soat ended his career as Deputy Chief of the Army in 2008. Van Bay now grows mangos on a farm outside Ho Chi Minh City — an account of his meeting with one of his former aerial opponents, Col. Ralph Wetterhahn, makes for fascinating reading.

Unlike American pilots, most of whom returned home after a single tour of duty, many Vietnamese pilots served for most of the conflict. Because there were so many American planes and fewer Vietnamese fighters, the best pilots racked up more aerial victories. In all, there were 16 Vietnamese aces recognized in the war.

Tomb is a fascinating case of a hero enshrined in legend by his opponents in the conflict. In the end, searching for the “real” Col. Tomb may be a wild MiG chase — but there were many Vietnamese pilots who lived up to his fearsome reputation.

This first appeared in WarIsBoring here.

Image: Creative Commons.
 
.
All the best for Hillary Clinton

She made the first visit to Vietnam in 1995, accompanying her husband US president Bill Clinton. America formally ended the period of hostilities and normalized relationship with former foe. 20 years after the Vietnam war. A long time. I made some trips back to Vietnam during that period, Vietnam was still in a terrible shape, with our people enduring hardship. Since then everything has changed. Not everything is good now, but I see we are on a good path. I believe she is definitely a better choice for Vietnam than Donald Trump. A man I don't know what he wants. Nor do most of others know, what he really wants.


clinton1.jpg



clinton2.jpg



clinton3.jpg



clinton4.jpg
 
. .
LOL, r&d already speaks for yourself. Your nirbhay is still in r n d phase, it's not even a working one yet.

And what is cpc? something to do with china? This thread has nothing to do with china so stay on topic. this thread is about super indian weapons and what they can do to "stop" a Chinese take over of the spratly. So far, no indian weapon is a game changer that can tip the tide of the battle for the viet in the spratly.

I repeat again, yakhont in the viet's inventory is 40, Brahmos is 0. The worst thing is that not even one country in south east asia ghettos has bought any indian made weapons,...but they have bought Chinese weapons. india can tout how superior indian weapons all she can,..but at the end of the day it's up to the customers if they take those indian claims seriously or not. ...and so far NO customers of indian weapons. ..even with a 600 million loan shark.
You oversaw several facts: the military cooperation between Vietnam and India has just started recently, with airforce and submarine trainings. Now begins the second phase with cost guard ship building and arms transfer technology. The world is not built in one day.

As for your repeated rants of Chinese invasion of Spratlys, if they could they would have done it long ago. Without your call.
 
.
14370277_1220178244706795_2076806061689235148_n.jpg


"Accidental" attack by 4 US aircraft (2 F-16s and 2 A-10s) on Syrian army positions that ended up killing at least 62 Syrian soldiers and wounding a 100 more.

Curiously enough, the Syrian army positions that were attacked had been occupied by the Syrian Army for quite some time which makes the explanation of an accident hard to believe. USA said that was trying to help the Syrian army, but it would be the first time that it tries to do so; it had also not operated in that area at all and it did not inform the Russians either.

Also curiously enough, in what seems to be a coordinated attack with ISIS, as soon as the air strikes stopped, ISIS launched an offensive on those positions.

The Russian spokesperson Maria Sakharova said: "We had come to the terrible conclusion that the United States supports ISIS". Well, many people already knew that for quite some time, nothing new there except that this is an official government statement.

Funny that this is the country that always seems to be talking about and denouncing "human rights" abuses or breaches of international law. Of course that standard does not apply to USA, only to its opponents. Many of the jihadis receiving financial and military support by USA and its allies somehow seem to be considered "moderates", they probably behead in a more gentle way I guess.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom