Varanasi court allows ASI survey of Gyanvapi Mosque, located next to Kashi Vishwanath Temple

[Crixus]

Take them

These are historical buildings you Muppet, they are used by Indian Muslims to worship


The temples are gone, they were destroyed a long time ago

Get over it, why is your communal state targeting Indian Muslims now


Thats idolatry

It's like mixing shit in your food and saying don't worry just eat around it

When the temple gets destructed it was historical and people used to worship if you can justify the destruction of the temple why are you angry now when the Mosque which was constructed over the remains gets removed.

That's the point, the temple was destroyed hundreds of years ago

And today in the 21st century the hindutva communal state is trying to target Indian Muslims NOW

So what's wrong now? If Muslims destructed a temple of Hindus and now they are claiming it back so whats wrong in it

 

[hussain0216]

There is no point in repeating, ad-nauseam, that the temple was destroyed a long time as if that settles it. That may settle it for you but it is not for those who actually make the decisions i.e. Indians. If it is proven that the mosque was built on a temple, regardless of whether it is 10 years ago or 1000 years ago, that mosque will be removed and the temple restored.

If it is proven that the mosque was built on a temple, then the Indian Muslims will be given a new place and funds to build a mosque. If things progress smoothly, hopefully, this mosque itself can be relocated without damaging it to a new place. But in no circumstances, will there not be a temple built.

The temples gone, it was torn to pieces


The mosque is a historical building, standing now

It should be protected as a historic site and a in use site for Indian Muslims

Attacking the religious sites of Indian Muslims is a act of war upon them by a hindutva extremist india

 

[Gilljutt]

The temples gone, it was torn to pieces


The mosque is a historical building, standing now

It should be protected as a historic site and a in use site for Indian Muslims

Attacking the religious sites of Indian Muslims is a act of war upon them by a hindutva extremist india

Mosque can be moved. There is no current or historical reason for the mosque to be where it is other than to steal the spot where Krishna was born.

 

[hussain0216]

But even if it was a million years ago, the mosque was built on Krishna's birthplace.

Scenario:
1. What if the British occupied Saudi Arabia destroyed mecca and built a church
2. during their occupation 40% of Saudi Arabia converted to Christianity.
3. After 200 years the British leave.
Outcome:
The first thing that muslims would want is the land where Mohammed was born.

Yaar we are not in the realms of what if's

There is NO temple


What you have is a historical mosque in use by Indian Muslims, that is the reality of today

Trying to repeatedly attack Indian Muslims by a biased communal state is oppression

 

[Robbie]

The temples gone, it was torn to pieces


The mosque is a historical building, standing now

It should be protected as a historic site and a in use site for Indian Muslims

Attacking the religious sites of Indian Muslims is a act of war upon them by a hindutva extremist india

The mosque whether historical or new, is not relevant to us. If the caretakers of the mosque agree, then it can be relocated without damaging it. But under no condition can that mosque remain on that land if the survey reveals that it used to be a temple.

 

[hussain0216]

Mosque can be moved. There is no current or historical reason for it to be where it is other then it was done to steal the spot where Krishna was born.

No it can't,, it's a historic mosque which is hundreds of years old


It's also IN USE

Indian Muslims use the mosque as we speak


Build your temple somewhere else

 

[Crixus]

The temples gone, it was torn to pieces


The mosque is a historical building, standing now

It should be protected as a historic site and a in use site for Indian Muslims

Attacking the religious sites of Indian Muslims is a act of war upon them by a hindutva extremist india

If Muslims can tear the place of worship of others then why they get angry when their place of worship which gets constructed over the same temple gets torn apart.

 

[Gilljutt]

Yaar we are not in the realms of what if's

There is NO temple


What you have is a historical mosque in use by Indian Muslims, that is the reality of today

Trying to repeatedly attack Indian Muslims by a biased communal state is oppression

Its not a historical mosque. It has no historic significance other than being built on the spot where Krishna was born..... lol.

 

[Crixus]

No it can't,, it's a historic mosque which is hundreds of years old


It's also IN USE

Indian Muslims use the mosque as we speak


Build your temple somewhere else

Wow, you are asking Hindus to build a temple somewhere else, the Mosque has only one significance its constructed over the remains of one of the holiest temple of Hindus ... why not take that Mosque as it's now under ASI no one is allowed to worship and It will good to see Muslims protest in UP.

 

[hussain0216]

The mosque whether historical or new, is not relevant to us. If the caretakers of the mosque agree, then it can be relocated without damaging it. But under no condition can that mosque remain on that land if the survey reveals that it used to be a temple.

The temple has been DESTROYED

There is no way around this

It was destroyed a long time ago by no one alive today



The mosque stands
It IN USE by Indian Muslims today
It is a current worship site
Indian Muslims pray at their mosque


Build your temple somewhere else

Indian Muslims wish to protect their historical sites and religious sites from these attacks by the hindutva extremist state in India

Its not a historical mosque. It has no significant history.

It's hundreds of years old, that's historic

It is a historic mosque for the Indian Muslim community of 220 million

 

[Robbie]

If Muslims can tear the place of worship of others then why they get angry when their place of worship which gets constructed over the same temple gets torn apart.

Its not a historical mosque. It has no significant history.

No it can't,, it's a historic mosque which is hundreds of years old


It's also IN USE

Indian Muslims use the mosque as we speak


Build your temple somewhere else

@hussain0216 At the end of the day, nobody is seeking permission from you or anybody else. People have just tried to explain our rationale.

The case is in court, the ASI has been asked to do a survey. Depending on the result of that survey, further action will be taken. You can choose to accept or not accept it. It doesn't really matter to us either way.

 

[hussain0216]

Wow you are asking Hindus to build a temple somewhere else ... why not take that Mosque as its now under ASI no one is allowed to worship and Its will good to see Muslims to protest in UP

Because their is no temple

Build your temple on empty ground somewhere else


The mosque is a EXISTING building, in USE by Indian Muslims, it's a religious site for Indian Muslims

 

[Gilljutt]

Because their is no temple

Build your temple on empty ground somewhere else


The mosque is a EXISTING building, in USE by Indian Muslims, it's a religious site for Indian Muslims

Existing building can be moved... no problem.

 

[Crixus]

Because their is no temple

Build your temple on empty ground somewhere else


The mosque is a EXISTING building, in USE by Indian Muslims, it's a religious site for Indian Muslims

Whether there was a temple or not it will be decided by ASI, although it's pretty clear from the walls of the Mosque that its constructed after demolishing the temple. Once ASI will submit the report, the court will decide, and sooner or later this Mosque will be gone.

As Banaras or Baba Viswanath has no significance for Islam they can take this structure which was constructed over the temple anywhere they want.

 

[hussain0216]

@hussain0216 At the end of the day, nobody is seeking permission from you or anybody else. People have just tried to explain our rationale.

The case is in court, the ASI has been asked to do a survey. Depending on the result of that survey, further action will be taken. You can choose to accept or not accept it. It doesn't really matter to us either way.

It matters to Indian Muslims

It is the culmination of Jinnahs message


It is the reality of the war being waged upon Indian Muslims by the hindutva extremist communal state

It is the use of biased hindutva extremist organisations to justify the destruction of Indian Muslims religious sites

It is the latest call to Indian Muslims about what we have always warned them about whether they are Kashmiri, Kerala or Bengali regarding india