What's new

USA: Reporter and Camera Man shot during LIVE TV

what was this guys record?? if had no history of crime then screening wouldn't of brought up red flags or stopped him from buying the gun.
Mental screening. It would be tedious but it might show up. Same basic screening process that takes place for the US mil.
 
.
Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
********-dot-com-b23_1440646379-11896212_1672649079621985_82726249804374_1440646385.jpg.resized.jpg
 
.
Mental screening. It would be tedious but it might show up. Same basic screening process that takes place for the US mil.

And how has that worked? Well......Okay....not so much?

The key thing to note here is, that no amount of psychological screening can show if the person is going to harm another one or not. Yes, you can take indicators like depression, social withdrawal, aggression......but you may end up declining them a means to legitimate self defence when it might be needed.

One way to look at this would be, why is America crazy with guns while other developed nations are not?
 
.
One way to look at this would be, why is America crazy with guns while other developed nations are not?

America is also crazy about cars in a way no other country is. What is your point?
 
. . . .

This is the elephant in the room. Mass shootings are sensational and get all the coverage. What doesn't get (as much) coverage is the hundred of murders committed daily in our inner city shitholes. Three people were killed in a Baltimore shooting just a few days ago, but that didn't get nearly as much coverage as Freddy Gray. This year Baltimore is on pace for the highest homicide rates in 40 years. But that doesn't get any coverage either. At the same time we have to deal with this black lives matter crap, when well over 90% of homicides of black people are at the hands of other blacks. Maybe we're just so used to ghetto violence that we've become numb to it. Mass shootings are anomalous and provoke a reaction. Which brings me to my main point. If black homicide rates were on par with white or even Hispanics, US murder rates would be lower than most of Europe.
 
.
It seems this intern / young lady had sexual connection to another senior anchor (not disclosed) , and the black guy was fired from channel because he stated folks commented racially against him ....

The pair had kept their relationship under the radar , at the station , disclosed only on interview after shooting that yes these two were active couple
2BAF4B4600000578-3211613-image-a-3_1440613958875.jpg


Black guy was more senior person ....

So the pro-dominantly white channel , fired the black guy who knows may be the boyfriend of the girl pitched in some "positive reviews" for his gf , to get that job

And ... BANG BANG
ad_179006871.jpg


The guy also was angry at church shooting of Black folks by white folks


or May be the black guy was sick in Mind !!!! He took out a preety cheerful lady who seemed to be loved by all folks !!!

You be the judge

2BAE213D00000578-3211613-image-a-26_1440599624573.jpg
2BAE213D00000578-3211613-image-a-26_1440599624573.jpg


TV-news-cameraman-Adam-Ward.jpg



But from pictures it seems the women was very licked person by people and the black person was mantally disturbed

The Reporter is dating the anchor-man at the time of the dead, it is not about who's senior or not, it's just different job title. The Black guy (the shooter) was also a former reporter himself.

The blackguy was fired from his job approximately 2 months prior the shooting, the black guys have received several complaint by other employee as well as audience and the Affiliation have given him 2 prior warning before terminating his job in the Station.

The shooter had sent a 26 pages manifesto to ABC before he shot himself, claiming Racial discrimination, Sexual discrimination (He is gay) and revenge from the Charleston shooting.

No information yet on whether or not the shooter and victim have any prior altercation or relations prior to shooting

Mental screening. It would be tedious but it might show up. Same basic screening process that takes place for the US mil.

the thing is, Basic Psychological Profiling does not usually works.

Psychological Screening can only detect a small spectrum of mental illness, things such as anti-social behaviour or autism can be write out, almost any other kind of violent mental disorder would not be surface via basic psy profiling (disorder such as Bi-Polar Disorder, Hyperactivities and Schizophrenia) especially when the patient is under medication.

Another thing is, there are more people buying gun a month then people joining the military in a whole year, it is quite not practical to conduct a nationwide psychological profiling.

And how has that worked? Well......Okay....not so much?

The key thing to note here is, that no amount of psychological screening can show if the person is going to harm another one or not. Yes, you can take indicators like depression, social withdrawal, aggression......but you may end up declining them a means to legitimate self defence when it might be needed.

One way to look at this would be, why is America crazy with guns while other developed nations are not?

To be honest, only a handful of develop country have a stricter gun law than US, most have equal or lax law on gun than even in the US

I have written an article about US Gun law a few weeks ago.

Understanding US Gun Law

In fact, Canada, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland have even lax gun law than in the US, almost all other is about the same, whatever you can get in the US, you can get it in the Balkan or France or Italy.
 
.
It seems this intern / young lady had sexual connection to another senior anchor (not disclosed) , and the black guy was fired from channel because he stated folks commented racially against him ....

The pair had kept their relationship under the radar , at the station , disclosed only on interview after shooting that yes these two were active couple
2BAF4B4600000578-3211613-image-a-3_1440613958875.jpg


Black guy was more senior person ....

So the pro-dominantly white channel , fired the black guy who knows may be the boyfriend of the girl pitched in some "positive reviews" for his gf , to get that job

And ... BANG BANG
ad_179006871.jpg


The guy also was angry at church shooting of Black folks by white folks


or May be the black guy was sick in Mind !!!! He took out a preety cheerful lady who seemed to be loved by all folks !!!

You be the judge

2BAE213D00000578-3211613-image-a-26_1440599624573.jpg
2BAE213D00000578-3211613-image-a-26_1440599624573.jpg


TV-news-cameraman-Adam-Ward.jpg



But from pictures it seems the women was very licked person by people and the black person was mantally disturbed

Systemic racism is not good.
 
.
To be honest, only a handful of develop country have a stricter gun law than US, most have equal or lax law on gun than even in the US

I have written an article about US Gun law a few weeks ago.

Understanding US Gun Law

In fact, Canada, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland have even lax gun law than in the US, almost all other is about the same, whatever you can get in the US, you can get it in the Balkan or France or Italy.

You missed what i wrote, completely....

Many countries have gun laws that allow ownership of personal firearms. However, what is the homicide rate by guns in those countries?

Check here:
List of countries by firearm-related death rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Norway has magnitudes less homicide rate by firearms than USA.....so Does UK....Canada...Denmark...Switzerland...Korea..

Point being, it is not the gun ownership at fault...but rather the psychology behind it.....but why does it seem to be so much prevalent in USA?

Almost every week we hear about a random shooting.....sometimes it is a college, hospital, mall, parking lot and sometimes totally random like shooting dead reporters on live tv.

Yes, that would be equally pointless. :D

Like most of your parroted posts on this forum.....

....i wonder if Syed.Ali.Haider is a robotic script.......
 
.
You missed what i wrote, completely....

Many countries have gun laws that allow ownership of personal firearms. However, what is the homicide rate by guns in those countries?

Check here:
List of countries by firearm-related death rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Norway has magnitudes less homicide rate by firearms than USA.....so Does UK....Canada...Denmark...Switzerland...Korea..

Point being, it is not the gun ownership at fault...but rather the psychology behind it.....but why does it seem to be so much prevalent in USA?

Almost every week we hear about a random shooting.....sometimes it is a college, hospital, mall, parking lot and sometimes totally random like shooting dead reporters on live tv.



Like most of your parroted posts on this forum.....

....i wonder if Syed.Ali.Haider is a robotic script.......

Gun law does not stop gun crime, the reason is very simple, you don't use your own gun you bought legally for crime, it's like robbing a bank and try to get away with your own car...

Crime being committed with or without firearms, unless one can prove any relationship between access to firearms and crime being committed. It's not like because it is easier to access firearms then let's go on a shooting rampage. It is the same as saying easier access to firearms make people more crazy.

This, crime rate, have to do with Psychology of a person, and organise crime, we can speculate all the time and trying to connect Gun Law/Ownership with Crime, but as much as people hate saying this, the real problem is at socio-psychology level. Ie, there got to be something wrong with the person head for him to wanting to go start a shooting rampage at the first place, no one in the sane mind would say "yeah, it's easy to get guns here, let shoot someone"
 
.
Point being, it is not the gun ownership at fault...but rather the psychology behind it.....but why does it seem to be so much prevalent in USA?

Ah yes, that must be the splanashun: Murrikans be mad! :D

You see, guns are a issue for USA but only in the sense that it becomes a favorite topic to begin bashing, a favorite pastime here on PDF. Somebody has to speak up, otherwise the fanatics hold sway, and by now they are used to getting their way in just about everything Pakistani.

(As for whether I am only subhuman or not, please read my signature. :D )
 
.
Gun law does not stop gun crime, the reason is very simple, you don't use your own gun you bought legally for crime, it's like robbing a bank and try to get away with your own car...

Crime being committed with or without firearms, unless one can prove any relationship between access to firearms and crime being committed. It's not like because it is easier to access firearms then let's go on a shooting rampage. It is the same as saying easier access to firearms make people more crazy.

This, crime rate, have to do with Psychology of a person, and organise crime, we can speculate all the time and trying to connect Gun Law/Ownership with Crime, but as much as people hate saying this, the real problem is at socio-psychology level. Ie, there got to be something wrong with the person head for him to wanting to go start a shooting rampage at the first place, no one in the sane mind would say "yeah, it's easy to get guns here, let shoot someone"

Well clearly, that has been happening........Cops are overly aggressive too because they don't know what the firearm wielding person will do. America, does seem to have a larger than normal share of psychos who shouldn't be having guns....that's all i am saying.
 
.
Well clearly, that has been happening........Cops are overly aggressive too because they don't know what the firearm wielding person will do. America, does seem to have a larger than normal share of psychos who shouldn't be having guns....that's all i am saying.

lol, am not saying anything either, but gun law in America have been the easy target for blame for crime being committed in the United States, it is very easy to blame Gun Law as well, than to try and fix the social injustice.

Problem is, most gun involved in a crime are obtained illegally, even some firearms are bought in a legal mean, they were being used with Criminal Mind in the beginning (Stuff like filing off the serial number, or replacing the barrel) I was working in the Forensic Department with MPD for half a year after I got out of the military, seen that enough time over my desk.

When you have a person who buys firearms with an illegal intention, it is not the firearms you need to look at or fix, but the person himself, simply because if that person cannot obtain a firearms in a legal mean, he or she would have got it by other mean anyway. The problem is fix the problem, not the gun
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom