US Welcomes China’s RIMPAC Spying
- Thread starter GR!FF!N
- Start date
F-22Raptor
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 16,980
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Ya, I'm not sure what that was all about. The Soviets conducted similar surveillance missions for years. This is probably just routine for the Navy.
Accusations of hypocrisy from an american, now that's something.
Precisely, they accuse China of hacking American defense and try to paint China as biggest cyber treat only to be exposed by snowden, a CIA agent that America is the biggest hacker and repeatly hack China system in the world.
The America preach about democracy and freedom but they openly support oppressive countries like former Shah Iran and current Saudi Arabia.
Talking about double standard. American are pioneer of such practice.
Beidou2020
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 7,857
- Reaction score
- -48
- Country
- Location
China couldn't care less about what US says. They already have their ships near China so it makes no difference to us if they increase spying. We can do the same and get more info as our technologies improve.
danger007
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 10,007
- Reaction score
- -27
- Country
- Location
no i hope you think more better... China is in game with US. don't take US moves careless ... they are masters in this moves ...
Beidou2020
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 7,857
- Reaction score
- -48
- Country
- Location
China wrote the book on it.
We need to do what they do to us as our capabilities increase.
Hypocrite Americans call oul China for hypocrisy when China reacts defensively to U.S. acts of aggressions.
Amercians bitched about and harrassed Soviet planes and ships every week in international airspace and international waters for decades.
Amercians bitched about and harrassed Soviet planes and ships every week in international airspace and international waters for decades.
You have no moral high ground. The reality is this is your way of spinning the fact that you have lost the "moral high ground" to diplomatically fence off access to "your" seas (not to mention your illegal annexation of Hawaii) to China. Now China can boldly return 100,000 favors you paid to the Chinese people, threatening their security with your terrorist spying activity. Turning out one of your commanders like a common media prostitute in your propaganda campaign only goes to show just how far you have fallen in strength and credibility.
This is spitting in the face of the US
loool are you joking mate? This isnt nothing really to the U.S. China still doesnt have the capability to really patrol in the U.S EEZ mainland. Meanwhile the U.S has the capabilities to patrol/spy on China and basically every country on the globe EEZ. So china sending a spy ship to an exercise organized by the U.S in a U.S islands in Asia isnt something that can be called 'spitting on the face of the U.S.
China still needs at least 30 years to reach current U.S naval capability, i.e assuming the U.S stays static.
But at least cheer up, i think in a decade or 2 from now China might/will be the second most powerful navy in the world if it keeps up its current growth trajectory. But as of now you are still way behind the worlds only superpower.
loool are you joking mate? This isnt nothing really to the U.S. China still doesnt have the capability to really patrol in the U.S EEZ mainland. Meanwhile the U.S has the capabilities to patrol/spy on China and basically every country on the globe EEZ. So china sending a spy ship to an exercise organized by the U.S in a U.S islands in Asia isnt something that can be called 'spitting on the face of the U.S.
China still needs at least 30 years to reach current U.S naval capability, i.e assuming the U.S stays static.
But at least cheer up, i think in a decade or 2 from now China might/will be the second most powerful navy in the world if it keeps up its current growth trajectory. But as of now you are still way behind the worlds only superpower.
Get a clue, fanboy. China could have caught up to the US militarily a long time ago, but it doesn't need or want to. America has been bleeding itself dry with its wars and can't do **** against China, anywhere.
lool im far from being a fanboy, just making a point/stating a fact. China couldn't/cant yet match the U.S militarily even if it wanted. So are you saying China doesnt want to be strong militarily? or has been lagging behind militarily on purpose?
that couldnt be any more far from the truth(contrary to your name bro.
). China still lags behind even Russia militarily, though in a few select sector it might be ahead of Russia, forget about the U.S.However , China has done a remarkable job so far these past decades, considering the fact that the cultural revolution basically decimated the entire chinese elite/intellectuals. its not obvious coming from such a low base of 0 to the current level where the country is, this is something not many countriues could acheived. However comparing China to the U.S is laughable. the U.S is way way ahead of not only China, but every other country on planet earth. So if china comes second to that in the near future it aint that bad mate.
,
Last edited:
lool im far from being a fanboy, just making a point/stating a fact. China couldn't/cant yet match the U.S militarily even if it wanted. So are you saying China doesnt want to be strong militarily? or has been lagging behind militarily on purpose?
However , China has done a remarkable job so far these past decades, considering the fact that the cultural revolution baically decimated the entire chinese elite/intellectuals. its not obvious coming fro such a low base of 0 to the current level where the country is, this is something not many countriues could acheive. However comparing China to the U.S is laughable. the U.S is not only way way far ahead of not China, but evry othyer country on planet earth. So if china comes second to that in the near future it aint that bad mate.
China has spent minimally on defense because it operates only in its own backyard. They have far better finances than America does and could easily ramp up military spending by 100-200%
China still needs at least 30 years to reach current U.S naval capability, i.e assuming the U.S stays static.
Good point. As if the US will stay static. As we speak they're building their 2nd Gerald Ford Class Supercarrier...!
