US Warships to fail against China, Russia - Think Tank Warns

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

US Fleet to Fail in Battle Against Russian, Chinese Navy, US Think Tank Says

According to recent research published by the Center of Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA), a think tank based in Washingtion, DC, the US fleet risks losing its superiority, as it faces difficulties in countering "the challenges posed by great powers like China and Russia".

A new report by the CSBA entitled "Regaining the high ground at sea", which considers the prospects of the US Navy in a changing environment, claims that without the ability to support new missions, carriers and their aircraft "would likely have gone the way of the battleship and left the fleet decades ago".

The authors of the report, while giving assessments of possible future threats, examine the US military strategy and the country's capabilities, warning that if current US naval and marine defence strategies were not transformed, the US fleet wouldn't be able to gain the upper hand in a battle with either Chinese or Russian military vessels.

The report recommends modernizing American Carrier Air Wings (CVWs), which are lacking "the range, endurance, survivability, and specialization to carry out the operational concepts needed to defeat great power militaries".

While analyzing how American and Soviet military capabilities evolved during the Cold War and post-Cold War periods, the authors say that even though the US "did not face a peer adversary" in the years following the Cold War, the current situation has changed.

"The current CVW configuration, however, is not well suited for the tactics that U.S. naval forces will need to employ against great power competitors, such as China and Russia, and regional powers fielding improved capabilities, like North Korea and Iran," the report reads.

The authors note that missile defence systems, "including directed energy weapons and short-range interceptors", which are being pursued by the Department of Defense, will not be sufficient in the case of potential Chinese and Russian missile launches.

Suggesting different naval force compositions, the researchers admit that their alternative plan "will be more expensive" than the one which currently exists, however, in order to preserve the relevance of the US fleet — it would be necessary.

SOURCE (HTTP) https://sputniknews.com/military/201812161070727865-us-fleet-fail-against-russian-navy/

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

Russia, China join forces for huge war game, flex might to US

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

Any moderator - this post was in context with my other CHINA post threatening war with US. That has been deleted by chinese moderators so now please delete this one. thanks

Any moderator - this post was in context with my other CHINA post threatening war with US. That has been deleted by chinese moderators so now please delete this one. thanks

@Deino

 

[Deino]

Any moderator - this post was in context with my other CHINA post threatening war with US. That has been deleted by chinese moderators so now please delete this one. thanks


@Deino

Not sure what's your intention? To troll, to provoke??
I explained You not always to start a new thread for each post you find but now you repeat that nasty BS in other sections too ... only to provoke.


If you want to start a pissing contest, please go ahead.

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

Not sure what's your intention? To troll, to provoke??
I explained You not always to start a new thread for each post you find but now you repeat that nasty BS in other sections too ... only to provoke.


If you want to start a pissing contest, please go ahead.

Please can you delete thank you

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

1. I posted news articles that have valid sources, are unedited word-for-word, and are referenced in both western and Chinese media sources. They broke no rules of the form whatsoever.

2. You deleted them because you are Chinese and you didn't like it. You did not delete any other posts that are poor quality. You attack data sources.

3. They were never talked about on this site before, nor previously posted. This is a high quality thread.

4. There were simple, easy-to-understand lacked conspiracy and were confirmed by what a normal person would consider reputable sources. And reported in the mainstream media, but maybe not in your country.

5. They are not trolling. They are not spam and they are not offensive. They are genuine sources of information in order to start a cultural and intellectual dialogue.

6. In the spirit of other posts previous to they are of the same magnitude and effect.

Further you are using words like "troll, provoke, BS, I explained, kindly, reminded, stupid" which are completely warped. In reality, you are censoring. And abusing your position as a moderator. And further stopping other members in the forum from accessing information, expanding their knowledge and growing intellectually. Your position is politically motivated. That is very clear.

 

[Sanchez]

Are you not a BD? With an even lower IQ than those of Indians.

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

Are you not a BD? With an even lower IQ than those of Indians.

Whats a BD

 

[Sanchez]

Whats a BD

Don't tell me you are a native Brit! You are a Muslim, possibly originated from Bangaladesh or India. Stop wasting your time by bring negative stuff on China to the forum, OK? You don't have an argument or the IQ to discuss issues about China!

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

Don't tell me you are a native Brit! You are a Muslim, possibly originated from Bangaladesh or India. Stop wasting your time by bring negative stuff on China to the forum, OK? You don't have an argument or the IQ to discuss issues about China!

What are you on about? 'Negative' stuff about China?

 

[Jlaw]

2. You deleted them because you are Chinese and you didn't like it. You did not delete any other posts that are poor quality. You attack data sources.

Why do you think Deino is Chinese? Anyone who disagree with you is automatically Chinese?

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

Why do you think Deino is Chinese? Anyone who disagree with you is automatically Chinese?

Because of something he said while moderating in a private message.

 

[Sanchez]

What are you on about? 'Negative' stuff about China?

Tell us how old you are, Sir?

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

Tell us how old you are, Sir?

Old enough to know a friend from a foe, whats your point?

 

[Sanchez]

Old enough to know a friend from a foe, whats your point?

Good for you! Are your parents from Bangladesh or India?