US warns Pakistan of ‘multiple repercussions’

[harpoon]

We are also runnin out of patience with yur stupid WOT..US should issue an appology and stop anti-Pakistan propoganda in the media..

Contact Iran for ways on how to piss off US. They have been successfully doing it since 1979.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

of course you cant overlook US Prez elections.....to do so would be incredibly naiive

 

[Edevelop]

US warns Pakistan of ‘multiple repercussions’
​

Islamabad: The US has now threatened Pakistan with ‘multiple repercussions’, if the six-month-long blockade of NATO supplies is not lifted, Pakistani officials have said.

According to sources, the implications include a halt in US assistance for the country’s fragile economy and squeezing the political space available to the ruling Pakistan People’s Party by relying on other political groups.

“During the meetings Marc Grossman recently had with Pakistani officials, it was obvious that the US was running out of patience,” a Pakistani official told The Express Tribune.

“A message has been conveyed at the highest level that if the government cannot take a decision regarding NATO supplies, the US will rely on Nawaz Sharif,” he added. His claim, however, could not be independently verified.

The official added that the Obama administration was increasingly concerned over the delay in the reopening of the vital NATO supply routes for foreign forces stationed in Afghanistan.

Last month, the country’s Parliament announced new terms of engagement that seek an unconditional apology from the US over the Salala incident.

Initially, Washington agreed to accept the demand but due to a delay in the passage of the new recommendations, coupled with domestic compulsions of President Barack Obama, the US is now reluctant to take such a step.

A PPP lawmaker acknowledged that the government was in a fix on how to move forward after the US hardened its stance.

“There is now a growing realisation that it was a mistake to ask the Parliament to formulate new foreign policy guidelines,” said the lawmaker.

Pakistan Defence Minister Ahmed Mukhtar also hinted at mounting pressure on the government to reopen the supply routes. He said Pakistan could face economic sanctions if it did not unplug the routes.

The US embassy, however, denied Washington conveying any threats to Islamabad.

“The UN wants NATO supplies to reopen, the US wants NATO supplies to reopen, but that should not be characterised as a threat,” said the embassy spokesperson.

ANI

US warns Pakistan of

Did Someone catch this?

 

[lem34]

Why are most posters ignoring the following comment in OP:

The US embassy, however, denied Washington conveying any threats to Islamabad

I reckon this is just propaganda from PPP whose leaders wish to ingratiate themselves with Americans and are giving public reasons to reopen transit routes

 

[VCheng]

Did Someone catch this?

Yes. There are many options available for finding amenable politicians, including IK and many others.

 

[JohnyD]

US has a department of warnings.

But these days China's department of warning has been issuing more warnings than US....

ufff....those megatons....lol...............

 

[lem34]

Yes. There are many options available for finding amenable politicians, including IK and many others.

Is it not brilliant that Americans and their supporters are squirming from corner to corner lol. First they said in a number of weeks Pakistan will reopen routes. Well they didnt. Then they said routes were not important. Now one minute they beg the next minute threaten. I love it long may America nad its supporters squirm

now they tell us they will interfere in our internal affairs. Do they not realise the people the Army all important institutions are on one page

 

[pakdefender]

America is a spent power , they cant do squat if we dont re-open the routes

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

They should ask Russia to provide NATO Route supply. These NATO route supply is not in the interest of Pakistan. From Karachi to Peshawar. it carries thrice load on trucks and wheelers which are effecting our roads very badly.

 

[Secur]

Hafiz Saeed is small fry. I worry more about AAZ and why Hillary is saying that he is in Pakistan. The repercussions could be considerable.

As if we give a rat's *** about the repercussions , we have faced worst in the war !

Continue negotiating with Taliban and try to find a face saving way to get out of the region

They should ask from Russia to provide NATO Route supply. These NATO route supply is not in the interest of Pakistan. From Karachi to Peshawar. it carries thrice load on trucks and wheelers which are effecting our roads very badly.

Russia ?

My dear friend , The closure of Pakistani routes has given Kremlin a leverage for the missile defense shield ...

Never before , Had the US been forced to tread so carefully ... One slip , and suddenly trigger happy Yanks will be out of supply sitting cold in Kabul Answering nature's call in the open

 

[parkland]

damm wounded pakistan is not being humiliated by usa. whats then respect of a country that is being warned every hour. they come aver anytime and bomb ur cities and attack civilians.

it all starts with AID

 

[Secur]

China defeated India in 1962!! Under the cover of the infamous Cuban Missile Crisis when the world was on the verge of a nuclear war! Immediately after the crisis was resolved China withdrew all its forces back into the barracks. That in any books is NOT called a victory! 67 and 87 incidents OTOH are defined as victories because they achieved the objectives of Indian armed forces, which was to STOP Chinese aggression. Period.

Kiddo , you seem to have been taught an alternate version of history ... The point you are trying to make by bringing " Cuban missile crisis " , is known as " strategy " throughout the world ... Trust me , every country makes use of it ... If you were so keen to fight and take back your areas , why did you accept ceasefire ? Everybody knows an unilateral ceasefire is unbinding on other party ... What is called " victory " in your books ? Loosing Aksai Chin ( 38,000 km2 ) , Demchok and tracts of land in AP along with heavy causalities to the extent that PLA was marching upto Tezpur ? Chinese claimed those areas and took it ... Hell they even captured AP which was returned only after the ceasefire ... Thank them ! ... Its ironic that Indians still have the nerve to brag about some incidents or skirmishes ending in " Status Quo Ante Bellum " Did you take back Aksai Chin in '67 or '87 ?

 

[lem34]

damm wounded pakistan is not being humiliated by usa. whats then respect of a country that is being warned every hour. they come aver anytime and bomb ur cities and attack civilians.

it all starts with AID

Well you blamed Pakistanis for bombay killings. What could you do to Pakistan??- Nothing

 

[Guli Danda]

1967 we kicked your a$$, 1984 we kicked your a$$.
Those were tiny skirmishes, even though we won them, they are nothing compared to the all out war of 1962.

India has never ever defeated china at anything.

I don't think you even know what you are saying..false flagger!WS-10 Engine!
Go check 1967 and 87 conflicts..you were whipped!Not us! 1962??Back stabbing?Attacking when we withdraw the military?...Bravado?..LMFAO

 

[harpoon]

Well you blamed Pakistanis for bombay killings. What could you do to Pakistan??- Nothing

Since that attack Pakistan never knew any peace..May be a coincidence, may be not.