What's new

US wants Pak to ' change behavior', stop acting ' selectively, on Taliban

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
https://tribune.com.pk/story/147536...ge-behaviour-stop-acting-selectively-taliban/

1475367-mcmaster-1502025442-443-640x480.gif


US President Donald Trump’s National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster has said the White House wanted to see a “change in behaviour” from interested groups in the region, particularly Pakistan.

In an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt that aired on Saturday, he said while Pakistan had suffered “great losses” fighting the Taliban, they had done so “selectively”, The Hill reported.

“This is Pakistan in particular that we want to really see a change in– and a reduction of their support – for – these groups,” he said. “I mean, this is– of course, you know, a very paradoxical situation, right, where Pakistan is taking great losses.”

“They have fought very hard against these groups,” McMaster argued, “but they’ve done so really only selectively.”

He said Trump was making clear that the US would no longer tolerate any support for the Taliban or related groups.

“The president has also made clear that he, that we need to see a change in behavior of those in the region, which includes those who are providing safe haven and support bases for the Taliban,” McMaster added.

McMaster defended the campaign in Afghanistan, arguing they had seen “tremendous” success in the country.

“There’s a tremendously successful campaign going on with Afghan forces in the lead. It’s an unreported campaign in Nangarhar Province of Afghanistan,” McMaster said.

“We’re not gonna talk tactics anymore, right?” he added. “Everything before was, you know, troop levels and very specific details announcing to the enemy years in advance exactly the number of troops you’re gonna have, exactly what they’re gonna do and what they’re not gonna do. And so the president has said, that ‘That is not the way to fight a war. It never has been.’ This is an invention of recent years.”

McMaster also said the president “absolutely” has confidence in the commander in charge of the U.S. war effort against the Taliban and ISIS in Afghanistan.

The general defended Trump’s decisions in Afghanistan and the commander in charge of the mission following reports that the president wanted to fire him.

According to reports this week of a situation room meeting in July, Trump believes General John Nicholson – the commander in charge of Afghanistan – is “losing” the war in the country.

“I’ve known him for many years,” McMaster said of Nicholson. “I can’t imagine a more capable commander on any mission.”

He said the president “absolutely” had confidence in Nicholson.

McMaster himself has been the target of right-wing Trump supporters outraged at the general’s decision to renew security clearance for Susan Rice, former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser.

“General McMaster and I are working very well together,” Trump said in a statement on Friday. “He is a good man and very proIsrael. I am grateful for the work he continues to do serving our country.”

McMaster in the interview with Hewitt also argued that Trump’s loosening of restrictions on the military was beginning to see a “payoff”.

“The president has said that he does not want to place restrictions on the military that undermine our ability to win battles in combat,” McMaster added. “He has lifted those restrictions, and you’re beginning to see the payoff of that as well.”
 
. .
want want want............
fact the Taliban have decimated NATO and America. its never about how many bombs you can put on a target its about winning the hearts and minds of the locals. lose that and the rise against you .... you have no chance. Americans are arrogant and don't learn from history.
 
.
We have nothing to do with the Taliban nor there filthy ideology. We are fighting these scumbags for a decade.
But on the other hand Stop Making Afghanistan a colony of India by your own American Dollars and then we will talk. Leave Afghanistan and then let the people of Afghanistan decide the fate of this land. We are not lending our resources and intelligence for the sake of this Amero-indian nurtured Kabul Regime.
So in Short USA want to Carefully nurture and grow a venomous Snake in our neihbour and want us to lend a hand to feed it? Stupidity at a whole new level.
 
.
“but they’ve done so really only selectively.”

nothing new, it was Pakistan's day, hopefully tomorrow their officials will blame Iran or Russia for their failures.

anyways, just like you selectively harbor TTP leadership in Afghanistan and growing ISIS there to put pressure on Pakistan and other regional countries, Pakistan is also worried about its security, we don't trust that you yanks can defeat a puny criminal gang let alone Taliban and there is reason behind this logic, history tells us that wherever uncle sam set foot, extremism start growing their not decreased. Pakistan must not take shortsighted decision, Talibans are reality, regional powers receive their envoys hence we should try to become neutral, we have supported US too much against them that too without any appreciation it may haunt us in future.

Taliban dont love Pakistan, after all they are Afghans at the end of the day, they hate Pakistan like every other Afghan, they believe Punjabi have occupied their territory till attock and so on.. while the reality is otherwise, Quaid e Azam won then NWFP democratically..

regional countries must come together to kick NATO filth out of Afghanistan.
 
. .
These are not redIndians Mr McMaster, they are afghans. What are you doing in their country? Get your ----- out, now. And for selective thing, you do this, not us. We bear discrimination at every level, be it your behaviour in the region with our country, be it your companies dealing with us or even recruiting, or your people behaving with our people. America, its us who are behaving till now, but we have our limits too.
Btw we still remember Raymond Davis.
 
. . .
US need to go back to their own country and do their own work .
Their presence in Afghanistan is useless if we have to all of their work.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom