What's new

US to back India's membership of UNSC: Obama

Chinese surprise: India now at par with P5
Your Ad Here
Chinese surprise: India now at par with P5

New Delhi: In a very significant strategic as well as diplomatic development, China on Monday upgraded its Ambassador to India Zhang Yan to the rank of vice-minister in the Chinese government.

Clearly, China upgrading its mission in India to the level it maintains in P5 countries on a day when US President Barack Obama is on a high-profile visit to New Delhi appears to be more than a mere coincidence.

The P5 or the powerful 5 is the exclusive club of world’s most powerful countries – USA, United Kingdom, China, France and Russia - who are also permanent members of United Nations Security Council.

As vice-minister the Ambassador will be reporting to the Chinese government on India’s reaction to all major issues, including currency movement.

The upgrade, confirmed by a spokesman of the Chinese embassy, suggests that India has moved up in China’s global pecking order and also points to the keenness of the Dragon to deepen its engagement with its neighbour - at a time when the region’s geo-politics is undergoing rapid changes.
Chinese surprise: `India now at pat with P5`
 
look guys lets not celebrate it YET.............. He did say that he will support india for the UNSC permanent member ship and for those who asks for VETO it is with veto else it is not permanent member ship............. when it expands may be in 2013 or 2020 when ever it is but no sooner than 2013 because india has non permanent member ship in security council but ..... when he spoke he did speak about IRAN and MYANMAR so the America will watch us how we play the cards and how we use our position as the non permanent member and contribute actively in the world forum........... so it is decided only after that which should be after 2013.......... is my guess.

Regarding China i can really understand why india is playing a submissive role and does not want to confront china and increase the rivalry between the two country................ Its UNSC permanent member ship since china can VETO any such move if it has any rivalry between them so India don't want to take any chance till then............ Once the UNSC member ship is done we can see more assertive india in regards to china...............

this move by the US is a master class the current business may be $10billion but in the future may be 10 years down the lane it will become a major trading partner with the US and who knows if our Govt plays all the cards well and get over the red tape we can take a big bite in the chinies manufacturing and export pie which is their back bone of their economy well may be not rite away may be 10 to 15 years down the lane.......... more over it all depends on how we take this initiative forward........ If india can do that it can definitely slow the chinies growth and can free the US from the dependency on China for their manufacturing goods and more over the US will be more comfortable with india than with china.........

this is my opinion
and trollers please stay away and if u have any positive and negative to add u are welcome but again trollers stay away and comments awaited
 
Last edited:
Well, this was one positive outcome of the trip. Frankly I was not expecting anything of substance, I was expecting all talk and no action - all 'Yes we can' type of nonsense. But this is a truly concrete step - the USA is finally walking the talk.
 
a historic day for india...cooperation in almost all the field especially education and agriculture. i am very happy
 
Barack Obama India trip: President supports India on UN Security Council


Mr Obama was making the announcement in a speech to India's parliament on the third and final day of his visit. In doing so, he fulfilled what was perhaps India's dearest wish for Mr Obama's trip here. India has been pushing for permanent Security Council membership for years.

"The just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate," Mr Obama said in prepared remarks. "That is why I can say today – in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member."

The announcement does not mean that India will join the five current permanent Security Council members in the near future. The U.S. is backing its membership only in the context of unspecified reforms to the council that could take years to bring about.

That makes Mr Obama's announcement more of a diplomatic gesture than a concrete step.

Nonetheless, it underscores the importance the U.S. places on fostering ties with this nation of 1.2 billion people, something Mr Obama has been seeking to accomplish throughout his time here.

Mr Obama said repeatedly throughout his three days in India – first in the financial centre of Mumbai and then in the capital of New Delhi – that he views the relationship between the two countries as one of the "defining partnerships" of the 21st century. He set out to prove it by making India the first stop on a four-country tour of Asia, and then through economic announcements, cultural outreach and finally the announcement about the U.N. Security Council.

India has sought permanent council membership as a recognition of its surging economic clout and its increased stature in world affairs. The U.S. endorsement is certain to deepen ties between the two countries and could also send Mr Obama's popularity in India skyrocketing to a level comparable to that enjoyed by George W. Bush. The former president is seen as a hero in India for helping end the country's nuclear isolation.

Barack Obama India trip: President supports India on UN Security Council - Telegraph




calm down. see the highlighted parts? Nobama is only doing what a lawyer does the best: Play Words With Kids . :cheesy:

in 2 years time, after 2012 that is, no one will remember this one-term president any more. so he can now "endorse" or "back" whatever he wants as it bears no legal or any realistic significance for the years ahead.

On the contrary, in exchange for these empty words, India is sending him real $$$. who is smarter now? :lazy:

by the way, China still holds the only whip hand in the whole game.:partay:
 
Barack Obama India trip: President supports India on UN Security Council


Mr Obama was making the announcement in a speech to India's parliament on the third and final day of his visit. In doing so, he fulfilled what was perhaps India's dearest wish for Mr Obama's trip here. India has been pushing for permanent Security Council membership for years.

"The just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate," Mr Obama said in prepared remarks. "That is why I can say today – in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member."

The announcement does not mean that India will join the five current permanent Security Council members in the near future. The U.S. is backing its membership only in the context of unspecified reforms to the council that could take years to bring about.

That makes Mr Obama's announcement more of a diplomatic gesture than a concrete step.

Nonetheless, it underscores the importance the U.S. places on fostering ties with this nation of 1.2 billion people, something Mr Obama has been seeking to accomplish throughout his time here.

Mr Obama said repeatedly throughout his three days in India – first in the financial centre of Mumbai and then in the capital of New Delhi – that he views the relationship between the two countries as one of the "defining partnerships" of the 21st century. He set out to prove it by making India the first stop on a four-country tour of Asia, and then through economic announcements, cultural outreach and finally the announcement about the U.N. Security Council.

India has sought permanent council membership as a recognition of its surging economic clout and its increased stature in world affairs. The U.S. endorsement is certain to deepen ties between the two countries and could also send Mr Obama's popularity in India skyrocketing to a level comparable to that enjoyed by George W. Bush. The former president is seen as a hero in India for helping end the country's nuclear isolation.

Barack Obama India trip: President supports India on UN Security Council - Telegraph




calm down. see the highlighted parts? Nobama is only doing what a lawyer does the best: Play Words With Kids . :cheesy:

in 2 years time, after 2012 that is, no one will remember this one-term president any more. so he can now "endorse" or "back" whatever he wants as it bears no legal or any realistic significance for the years ahead.

On the contrary, in exchange for these empty words, India is sending him real $$$. who is smarter now? :lazy:

by the way, China still holds the only whip hand in the whole game.:partay:

u have limited time 2 enjoy,no u.s president ever said this:lol:
 
Barack Obama India trip: President supports India on UN Security Council


Mr Obama was making the announcement in a speech to India's parliament on the third and final day of his visit. In doing so, he fulfilled what was perhaps India's dearest wish for Mr Obama's trip here. India has been pushing for permanent Security Council membership for years.

"The just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate," Mr Obama said in prepared remarks. "That is why I can say today – in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member."

The announcement does not mean that India will join the five current permanent Security Council members in the near future. The U.S. is backing its membership only in the context of unspecified reforms to the council that could take years to bring about.

That makes Mr Obama's announcement more of a diplomatic gesture than a concrete step.

Nonetheless, it underscores the importance the U.S. places on fostering ties with this nation of 1.2 billion people, something Mr Obama has been seeking to accomplish throughout his time here.

Mr Obama said repeatedly throughout his three days in India – first in the financial centre of Mumbai and then in the capital of New Delhi – that he views the relationship between the two countries as one of the "defining partnerships" of the 21st century. He set out to prove it by making India the first stop on a four-country tour of Asia, and then through economic announcements, cultural outreach and finally the announcement about the U.N. Security Council.

India has sought permanent council membership as a recognition of its surging economic clout and its increased stature in world affairs. The U.S. endorsement is certain to deepen ties between the two countries and could also send Mr Obama's popularity in India skyrocketing to a level comparable to that enjoyed by George W. Bush. The former president is seen as a hero in India for helping end the country's nuclear isolation.

Barack Obama India trip: President supports India on UN Security Council - Telegraph




calm down. see the highlighted parts? Nobama is only doing what a lawyer does the best: Play Words With Kids . :cheesy:

in 2 years time, after 2012 that is, no one will remember this one-term president any more. so he can now "endorse" or "back" whatever he wants as it bears no legal or any realistic significance for the years ahead. On the contrary, in exchange for this empty words, India is sending him real $$$. who is smarter now? :lazy:

by the way, China still holds the only whip hand in the whole game.:partay:

This is only one part of a long and arduous diplomatic process. It isn't as if Obama says it, and it gets done. Everyone knows that this is just one step in the process.

And as far as China holding the 'whip' is concerned, let us see if China will dare 'crack the whip' when it comes to the crunch. It all remains to be seen.

Edit: And most importantly, I hope you realize that in the UN, if France, UK, Russia AND the USA push for something it generally gets done. If India lobbies well diplomatically for reforms in the security council and gets all these countries to back the proposal, we might be seeing reforms much faster than you would think!
 
Last edited:
Barack Obama India trip: President supports India on UN Security Council


Mr Obama was making the announcement in a speech to India's parliament on the third and final day of his visit. In doing so, he fulfilled what was perhaps India's dearest wish for Mr Obama's trip here. India has been pushing for permanent Security Council membership for years.

"The just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate," Mr Obama said in prepared remarks. "That is why I can say today – in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member."

The announcement does not mean that India will join the five current permanent Security Council members in the near future. The U.S. is backing its membership only in the context of unspecified reforms to the council that could take years to bring about.

That makes Mr Obama's announcement more of a diplomatic gesture than a concrete step.

Nonetheless, it underscores the importance the U.S. places on fostering ties with this nation of 1.2 billion people, something Mr Obama has been seeking to accomplish throughout his time here.

Mr Obama said repeatedly throughout his three days in India – first in the financial centre of Mumbai and then in the capital of New Delhi – that he views the relationship between the two countries as one of the "defining partnerships" of the 21st century. He set out to prove it by making India the first stop on a four-country tour of Asia, and then through economic announcements, cultural outreach and finally the announcement about the U.N. Security Council.

India has sought permanent council membership as a recognition of its surging economic clout and its increased stature in world affairs. The U.S. endorsement is certain to deepen ties between the two countries and could also send Mr Obama's popularity in India skyrocketing to a level comparable to that enjoyed by George W. Bush. The former president is seen as a hero in India for helping end the country's nuclear isolation.

Barack Obama India trip: President supports India on UN Security Council - Telegraph




calm down. see the highlighted parts? Nobama is only doing what a lawyer does the best: Play Words With Kids . :cheesy:

in 2 years time, after 2012 that is, no one will remember this one-term president any more. so he can now "endorse" or "back" whatever he wants as it bears no legal or any realistic significance for the years ahead.

On the contrary, in exchange for these empty words, India is sending him real $$$. who is smarter now? :lazy:

by the way, China still holds the only whip hand in the whole game.:partay:
hahaha..lol what a stupid assessment.. it is a process, it can't be like today's he endorses and next day we will be in SC. it will take time and india will surely lead the way. and after 2012 when the republican will come into power, who are the ardent supporter of india (forget mc chain and bush).
 
Pak cries foul:
An angry Pak hit out after Obama's endorsement of India's bid for a permanent seat at the UNSC.
Says US should take moral view and not base itself on temporary expediency.
SaysUSshould consider India's 'flagrant violations' of J-K UN resolutions
Reasons enough to discredit proposed directive of reforms
US endorsement of India's bid adds to complexity of reform process.
Expects UNto take a moral view.
 
The bickering will come from countries such as SA, Nigeria, who will demand a place for Africa, Brazil and Argentina will claim that South America needs representation, in Europe the Germans will claim that they should have a place.

In Asia Japan and South Korea, will claim they deserve a place, while Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey will want the Islamic World represented in the Security Council. So because these things are decided on consensus and currently in the world there is none, there is little or no chance in the foreseeable future of large scale change in the UN. :)

Other than the five existing permanent members, the consensus of other countries doesn't matter much. Of course China can cater to any of these groups concerns.
 
Pak cries foul:
An angry Pak hit out after Obama's endorsement of India's bid for a permanent seat at the UNSC.
Says US should take moral view and not base itself on temporary expediency.
SaysUSshould consider India's 'flagrant violations' of J-K UN resolutions
Reasons enough to discredit proposed directive of reforms
US endorsement of India's bid adds to complexity of reform process.
Expects UNto take a moral view.


It is Pakistan that violated the preconditions set in the J-K UN resolution.
 
Also most of the General Assembly want the veto removed and view permanent status to be discriminatory, so that will also be a hurdle to reform of the security council. :)

:agree::agree: Even i think this UNSC is a thing of 20th century..
However i'll be happy if we get into this..FEEL GOOD FACTOR you know;)
 
in 2 years time, after 2012 that is, no one will remember this one-term president any more. so he can now "endorse" or "back" whatever he wants as it bears no legal or any realistic significance for the years ahead.

Thats what We are waiting for..Let the republicans return and we will witness an unprecedented advancement in India-USA relationships..

P.S- For conspiracy theorist India-Israel lobby will be back as a force to reckon with..
 
Back
Top Bottom