What's new

US strengthens military ties with Pakistan

idune

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
-40
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
US strengthens military ties with Pakistan

The meeting of the United States-Pakistan Defence Consultative Group, which was held in Rawalpindi on September 21, carries profound symbolism. Although the attack on the Indian army camp at Uri, which India insists was Pakistan-sponsored, took place only on September 18, and ignoring the Indian elite’s hysterical threat of ‘jaw for tooth’ et al, Washington nonetheless decided to go ahead with the meeting.

So much for the India-US “defining partnership ”! So much for Pentagon chief Ashton Carter being a ‘Friend of India’! So much for the US-India logistics agreement, too!
Yet, the government continues with its grovelling at the American feet. The Indian Express newspaper reports today that India’s Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar is frogmarching Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s cabinet this afternoon to post-haste approve the Paris Agreement, overruling the scepticism of Enviornment Ministry and a host of sister ministries. To quote Indian Express,

  • He (Jaishankar) is also learnt to have quoted the special unilateral relation between India and the US, and argued that since the pact had been steered by the US, not ratifying it would send a wrong signal, especially when Barack Obama had just two months to go as US president. (Indian Express)
Isn’t it bizarre that when our government is preparing a nice farewell gift for Obama as he leaves the White House, and when Modi has vowed to ‘isolate’ Pakistan in the international community and hopes to get sanctions imposed on that country, for Pentagon it is business-as- usual with the GHQ in Rawalpindi?
Washington couldn’t care less that 18 Indian soldiers were slaughtered and that the pain still lingers in our heart. The Pakistan delegation to the meeting in Rawalpindi last Tuesday was led by Defence Secretary Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Zamir Ul Hassan Shah, while the US delegation was led by a ranking Pentagon official, Principal Deputy Undersecretary of Defence Policy Ambassador David B. Shear.

The joint statement issued after the meeting said the US and Pakistan “recognized the centrality of the US-Pakistan bilateral security partnership to their overall bilateral relationship and acknowledged that continued cooperation remains vital to promoting peace, security and stability in the region and beyond”.
The statement highlighted the two countries’ “commitments to a strong defence relationship in years ahead, geared to achieve common strategic objectives particularly related to counter-terrorism, regional stability and other areas of security cooperation”.

There were discussions regarding both countries’ “strategic priorities”, Pakistan’s on-going counter-terrorism operations, maritime security in the North Arabian Sea and Horn of Africa, “political and security situation in Afghanistan”, Afghan reconciliation, “operative coordination” between the two militaries, Pak-Afghan cooperation in border management, etc.

The overall sense one gets is that the US highly values the mil-to-mil cooperation with Pakistan, and the special flavour of the relations has far from dissipated.

Second, the joint statement underscores that US continues to ascribe centrality to Pakistan’s role in the stabilization of Afghanistan. The Pentagon’s eagerness to bond with the GHQ in Rawalpindi highlights how heavily Washington depends on Pakistan’s cooperation to sustain its open-ended military presence in Afghanistan — over 30000 trained American personnel, Special Forces, a full-fledged intelligence apparatus, drone aircraft for surveillance on Iran and surrounding regions, air power, plus of course the NATO forces in their thousands.

Significantly, the joint statement contains a pointed formulation to the effect that US and Pakistan “underscored that no country’s territory should be used to destabilize other countries”. Indeed, this is all incredibly ludicrous. Here in Delhi, Modi government is supposedly looking at ‘options’ to hit back at Pakistan in any whichever way it can, while in Washington, Obama administration is looking for ways to strengthen US’ military cooperation with Pakistan.


The illusion in the public mind that Modi ‘transformed’ the US-Indian relationship is fast evaporating.

What was all that banga banga on Madison Square Garden really about? What difference did it make to US-Indian relations?
Clearly, the US stance on the recent tensions in India-Pakistan relations and on the situation in Kashmir has not at all been helpful. The unkindest cut of all is that Washington doesn’t appear to believe in the Indian allegation that Pakistan had a hand in the Uri attack. Consider the US-Pakistani exchanges in these 10 days alone since the Uri attack on September 18:


  • On September 19, US Secretary of State John Kerry met Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif;
  • On September 21, US-Pakistan Defence Consultative Group met in Rawalpindi;

  • On September 23, White House “welcomed” the peace deal with Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (who lives in Pakistan).
Pakistan is accordingly toughening its stance toward India. The Advisor on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz told the National Assembly in Islamabad on Tuesday that if India so much as decides to revoke the Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan will treat it as an act of war. It’s both a snub and a defiant challenge to Modi himself personally.

Again, Aziz added that Pakistan is preparing a dossier on India’s alleged interference in Baluchistan. “We will expose India at the United Nations Security Council and before the international community,” he said.
Aziz would have factored in that US takes a dim view of Modi’s foray into Baluchistan. (See an acerbic commentary on the topic by the US government-funded RFERL entitled India Unlikely To Reshape Pakistan’s Baluch Conflict.)

Wake up, Modiji! Obama simply did his job for promoting his country’s exports (civilian and military) to the Indian market, and we paid dearly for those imports in hard-earned money. Obama doesn’t expect a farewell gift from us!

It’s this appalling comprador mindset of servility in the Hindu DNA that once tragically led to the shameful history of our beloved country becoming a British colony. The text of the US-Pakistan joint statement issued at Rawalpindi on September 21 is here.

http://blogs.rediff.com/mkbhadrakumar/2016/09/28/us-strengthens-military-ties-with-pakistan-2/
 
Another "gem" by former Amb. MK Bhadrakumar. The bitterness of this man is for all clear to see with his mocking tone. He was a EAM babu once, but has been scribbling columns for fifteen years decrying India's move away from Nehurvian foreign policy of non-alignment.

A bakwas article.
 
Another "gem" by former Amb. MK Bhadrakumar. The bitterness of this man is for all clear to see with his mocking tone. He was a EAM babu once, but has been scribbling columns for fifteen years decrying India's move away from Nehurvian foreign policy of non-alignment.

A bakwas article.

Yep, you label anything that doesn't suit your agenda as bakwas. Get off the high horse. The isolation policy hasn't worked. Admit your failures. As for being bitter, you should rather pose that question to the Modi government.
 
Last edited:
Hindu Extremist lead India has lost all respect in the world in such a short period of time.

This is how Indians are responding on Facebook..

eNTskaW.png


Another "gem" by former Amb. MK Bhadrakumar. The bitterness of this man is for all clear to see with his mocking tone. He was a EAM babu once, but has been scribbling columns for fifteen years decrying India's move away from Nehurvian foreign policy of non-alignment.

A bakwas article.

Zor ka jhatka dheere sa lage!

hqdefault.jpg
 
Depends on what your definition of isolation is.

"Isolation" is not a vague concept for which everybody's opinion differs. It literally means that your left standing alone where no one is willing to support/ stand with you. Your Op "isolation" has already been coffined up and buried by none other then your best mates the Russians .. forget China or the OIC or the US. At the end of the day, historically your biggest ally is conducting it's first ever military exercise with the aim to improve militarily ofcourse but also to build better relationships. This happens right after you claim that ... Pak was behind Uri attack and your media props up the idea that mission "isolation" is at play and Russia has taken the first jab by cancelling the exercise ... and a day later Russian special forces are on Pakistani soil for an exercise that was propagated to be cancelled .. and your here talking about the "definition of isolation" ... My personal opinion... looking up the definition of a 'slap in the face' would do much better for you guys right about now ... Don't worry too much though ... we can surely lend you some help with that one ..


giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Well we know what India's definition of isolation is. India has successfully isolated Pakistan from Bangladesh, Bhutan and Afghanistan.
First get Those damn 8 f-16 then talk Do more talk less We Successfully cut your aid
These few Feel good article Only amuse fanboys Not Rational minds
 
1. u.s. state dept disregards indian uri attack evidence
2. secretary of state shows grave concerns about the iok human rights violations.
3. u.s. pressures india to get back to the negotiations table
4. now this, u.s. wants to strengthen military ties with Pakistan

Who is isolated again??? :blink:

Side note: some ally of india:laughcry:
 
nonsense. this mtg was about Pakistan nuclear security weaknesses and possible changes that we will require Pakistan to make in the short term.
 
The overall sense one gets is that the US highly values the mil-to-mil cooperation with Pakistan, and the special flavour of the relations has far from dissipated.

US-Pakistan relationship has always been the military angle. Pakistan spends it's hard earned Rupees to buy US military equipment. It's always been this way, while India, through their policies, is getting $Billions in FDI. Who would you want to be?

The illusion in the public mind that Modi ‘transformed’ the US-Indian relationship is fast evaporating.

Non-sense. The US knows peace, or the inability of terrorist groups to regroup in the region depends on Pakistan.

Unless the US can rely on Indian troops to be able to conduct operations in FATA or Baluchistan Pakistan's interest will be required. A few dangling F-16s are a small price to pay.

This isn't a trilateral relationship. Pakistan & India aren't a supranational organization. Only Bilateral relations ally.

nonsense. this mtg was about Pakistan nuclear security weaknesses and possible changes that we will require Pakistan to make in the short term.

Why don't you read the statement rather than bs a post?

Below is the released statement after the meetings:

http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Do...Joint_Statement.pdf?ver=2016-09-22-174938-580

1. Militant/ terrorist networks in FATA/ Waziristan/ Afghanistan
2. Improvements in military coordination
3. Respect for sacrifices of respective nations
4. Improving coordination/ relationships with the ANA.
 
Back
Top Bottom