What's new

US sends warning to Bangladesh on free election

Dont want to de-rail this thread but it shows the US duplicity and double standards. They are quiet like a robber through the night. Saying absolutely nothing as democracy is made a sham in Pak. It shows they dont like IK and want him gone so are happy to turn a blind eye. On the other hand they dont like current Bangladesh government so making moves.
 
.
is that for BD only

It will be expanded to other countries I'm sure. Even Modi's India. But they will tread lightly in that case. Modi has much more 'Pull' and has far more leverage.

Bangladesh and Pakistan does not.

Plus bhakts are very good at begging and prostrating to feet. Instead of Modi it will be Blinken's and Biden's feet....
 
Last edited:
.
Perhaps, the American perception of Pakistan is ‘Not to return to normal again and no hope’. Do, it may be a hands off policy. But, Pakistan has a democracy. IK was ousted in the Parliament through a vote.

Moreover, Pakistan is no more a geographically important as it was when the USSR moved south to Afghanistan that could have resulted it to reach the Arabian Sea.

Now, America does not want China to make a military corridor through Burma and reach the BoB. America needs BD assistance here.

The way this Hasina Bibi and the BAL party are entertaining China, the day is not far when China will extend its hand to the BoB.

Greed for power and money has made Hasina an idol for China. America wants a fair election that may change the situation.

Pakistan is still a major non nato ally and of major geostrategic interest

- population of 230+ million. Middle class of 150+ million. Nuclear muslim power. Influence in central asia, middle east, and south asia.

The US interest is to keep pakistan in a pressure cooker mode. They dont want to see a strong Pakistan yet at the same time dont want to see a weak fragmented pakistan.

The US wants to keep Paksitan in a perpetual state of conflict always coming back from the edge of the cliff. A sort of managed chaos scenario.

Id beg to differ Pakistan is a democracy. Its a hybrid regime effectively ran by the Military whereby BD is more democratic in the true sense that even though its somewhat a 1 party state its military is still subservient to the govt.

Ideally this the structure Pakistan will adopt once PTI returns to power. Pakistan in many ways is where Turkey was in the last 1990s/early 2000s. All set for major economic and political transformation in the next 2-3 decades.
 
.
The is an hour+ video. This has an interview with Donald Lu in English. The rest is in Bangla.

Pakistan is still a major non nato ally and of major geostrategic interest

- population of 230+ million. Middle class of 150+ million. Nuclear muslim power. Influence in central asia, middle east, and south asia.

The US interest is to keep pakistan in a pressure cooker mode. They dont want to see a strong Pakistan yet at the same time dont want to see a weak fragmented pakistan.

The US wants to keep Paksitan in a perpetual state of conflict always coming back from the edge of the cliff. A sort of managed chaos scenario.

Id beg to differ Pakistan is a democracy. Its a hybrid regime effectively ran by the Military whereby BD is more democratic in the true sense that even though its somewhat a 1 party state its military is still subservient to the govt.

Ideally this the structure Pakistan will adopt once PTI returns to power. Pakistan in many ways is where Turkey was in the last 1990s/early 2000s. All set for major economic and political transformation in the next 2-3 decades.
Pakistan Judiciary and Election System are not as hopelessly pathetic as it is in Bangladesh.
 
Last edited:
.

Assistant Secretary Donald Lu’s Interview with Channel i Tritiyo Matra’s Zillur Rahman​

Home | News & Events | Assistant Secretary Donald Lu’s Interview with Channel i Tritiyo Matra’s Zillur Rahman
349076466_279151697977214_6615004205727009870_n-1080x684.jpg




ZR: Welcome to the show. Just about three hours ago your Secretary of State Mr. Antony Blinken announced a new visa policy to promote democratic actions in Bangladesh. Under this visa policy the United States will be able to restrict the visas of any Bangladeshi individuals believed to be responsible for undermining the democratic elections in Bangladesh. Mr Donald Lu, my questions to you: Why did the US government take this new visa policy for Bangladeshis, and is this really necessary?

DL:
Thanks Zillur so much for having me on your program today. I want to make something very clear.
We have not sanctioned anybody today. As you just mentioned the Secretary of State has issued a new policy today that allows the US government to restrict US visas for anyone found to be impeding or undermining free and fair elections in Bangladesh. So this could members of the government, could be members of the judiciary, could be law enforcement, or it could members of the opposition. Our view is that the defense of democracy is both necessary and essential for Bangladesh to continue to move forward as a leader in South Asia and around the world.
ZR: How will Bangladeshi individuals, including current and former Bangladeshi officials and others be targeted under this policy? As you mentioned government officials – any members of government? Anyone?
DL:
So Zillur let me repeat. This policy will be applied equally to members of government and to members of opposition.
For example, if we were to find that members of the opposition had been involved in violence to undermine elections or voter intimidation, that individual would not be allowed to get a US visa. Similarly if we were to find that a member of government or law enforcement was involved in voter intimidation or violence or denial of free speech, we would not allow that person to travel to the United States.
ZR: And if it is the media, if it is internet service provider, if it is any other organization, even cell phone operators?
DL:
So Zillur, internet service providers don’t travel to the United States. This is not for institutions. It is only for the individuals.
ZR: Do the visa restrictions affect family members as well?
DL:
Yes, is the answer. Both this new policy as well as the law that underpins it is very clear. Immediate family members, meaning spouses and children, are subject to these same visa restrictions.
ZR: Will you notify the affected individuals that their visas have been revoked?
DL:
Correct, for anyone that we would revoke a visa for we would inform them immediately.
ZR: And Mr. Donald, who specifically will be restricted? Who specifically?
DL:
Zillur, again, the Secretary of State has announced a policy today and we have not yet applied the policy to any specific individuals. The policy allows us to restrict travel to the US for anyone who has committed abuses in one of four areas:
Voter intimidation, vote rigging, denial of free speech or freedom of assembly, and violence that seeks to undermine free and fair elections.
I want to give you my promise that this policy will be carried out in a way that is fair and constructive, and will be carried out equally toward opposition and government.
The US government never takes sides in elections. We do not support a particular party or a particular candidate. The only thing the US government supports is a free and fair democratic process.
ZR: How would visa restrictions apply to individuals committing offenses taking orders from higher levels to whom it would be difficult to link involvement?
DL:
It’s a great question. These restrictions would apply both to those giving orders and those taking orders. For those who are those are taking orders and who carry out acts of violence, or voter intimidation, or vote rigging, they would be ineligible for a U.S. visa.
At the same time those who are giving orders, those individuals, would not be allowed to travel to Untied States either.
ZR: Is this announcement in retaliation for the Government of Bangladesh’s decision of May 14 to curtail Ambassador Haas’ security detail?
DL:
Zillur it is absolutely not. I personally was involved with providing advanced notice about this policy to the Bangladeshi Government on May 3rd. So there’s no way our decision and our announcement on May 3rd could be retaliation for a decision taken by a government later on May 14th. The US government has not, and we will not, take decisions based on retaliation.
ZR: How far back does this policy apply?
DL:
Zillur, this is a forward-looking policy, meaning that our hope is that this policy will help to prevent violent and promote a free and fair election this coming year in Bangladesh. We take very seriously that responsibility and we don’t plan to look backwards.
The United States consider ourselves a friend of Bangladesh. We want that this policy is used to support the efforts of your Prime Minister, her government, the Bangladeshi civil society, and the Bangladeshi people to have a free and fair election in a country which is just so important to the United States.
ZR: Mr Donald Lu could you please tell us why Bangladesh elections are so important to the USA?
DL:
Zillur, I have had the opportunity visit several times to Bangladesh/. It is a country that is very special to us. We have wonderful people to people ties between families and between institutions like universities and our companies. For us, the promotion of democracy around the world is a central tenant of the Biden Harris administration and we believe Bangladesh is a true democracy that deserves to have free and fair elections.
ZR: Would you like to add anything else?
DL:
Zillur, I know this policy will create questions. I just have to emphasize again that we take this decision in the most constructive and positive way. We want this to contribute to the dialogue in Bangladesh and efforts by everyone – government, opposition, civil society – to create the environment for a free and fair election in the year ahead. This could be difficult times for Bangladesh, or this could be that this election ushers in a really joyous age in which Bangladesh can celebrate all of its accomplishments, both economic, but also political accomplishments, by making an election that is better than all the elections before it. That’s our hope.
ZR: Ambassador, Assistant Secretary of the State, thank you so much, thanks for your time.
DL:
It has been a delight to be with you Zillur. Let me wish you and your audience all the success.
ZR: Thank you so much, thank you. I hope to see you soon in Bangladesh.
DL:
I look forward to it.

Announcement of Visa Policy to Promote Democratic Elections in Bangladesh​

Home | News & Events | Announcement of Visa Policy to Promote Democratic Elections in Bangladesh
50909235586_e87feff702_c.jpg




U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office of the Spokesperson

For Immediate Release
STATEMENT BY SECRETARY ANTONY J. BLINKEN
May 24, 2023

Announcement of Visa Policy to Promote Democratic Elections in Bangladesh​

Today, I am announcing a new visa policy under Section 212(a)(3)(C) (“3C”) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to support Bangladesh’s goal of holding free, fair, and peaceful national elections. Under this policy, the United States will be able to restrict the issuance of visas for any Bangladeshi individual, believed to be responsible for, or complicit in, undermining the democratic election process in Bangladesh. This includes current and former Bangladeshi officials, members of pro-government and opposition political parties, and members of law enforcement, the judiciary, and security services. The United States notified the Bangladeshi government of this decision on May 3, 2023.
Actions that undermine the democratic election process include vote rigging, voter intimidation, the use of violence to prevent people from exercising their right to freedoms of association and peaceful assembly, and the use of measures designed to prevent political parties, voters, civil society, or the media from disseminating their views.
The holding of free and fair elections is the responsibility of everyone—voters, political parties, the government, the security forces, civil society, and the media. I am announcing this policy to lend our support to all those seeking to advance democracy in Bangladesh.

Frequently Asked Questions on New Visa Policy in Support of Bangladesh’s Elections​

Home | News & Events | Frequently Asked Questions on New Visa Policy in Support of Bangladesh’s Elections
default-blog-seal.jpg




Q. To whom would these visa restrictions apply?
A. This policy applies to any individual responsible for, or complicit in, undermining the democratic election process in Bangladesh. This includes current or former Bangladeshi officials, government supporters, and opposition members, among others. This would also include the immediate family members of such persons.
Q. Have any visa restrictions occurred under this policy at this time?
A. No. As the Secretary stated, the United States is committed to building a strong partnership with the Government of Bangladesh grounded in democracy and human rights. We welcome the Prime Minister’s expressed commitment to holding free and fair elections.
Q. Are these visa restrictions directed against the Government or the Awami League?
A. No, the United States does not support any particular political party. Restrictions under this new policy target individuals engaging in behavior that undermines the democratic election process, regardless of affiliation.
Q. Will you notify the affected individuals that their visas have been revoked?
A. It is a general practice to notify individuals whose visas are revoked or cancelled.
Q. How would visa restrictions apply to individuals who commit offenses after following orders from higher levels? What if it is difficult to link higher level decision-makers to those carrying out orders?
A. The policy applies to anyone who is responsible for, or complicit in, undermining the democratic election process in Bangladesh.
Q. Is this announcement in retaliation for the Government of Bangladesh’s May 14 decision to curtail Ambassador Haas’s security detail?
A. Given our close cooperation with the Government of Bangladesh, we informed it of this policy decision on May 3.
Q. Why does the United States care so much about Bangladesh’s elections?
A. The United States supports free and fair elections everywhere. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her government have committed to supporting free and fair elections in Bangladesh. This policy is designed to support these efforts and the Bangladeshi people, so they may hold elections to choose their leaders.
 
. . .
If this gets applied to Pakistan, PPP will have a heart attack.

So I am pretty sure they had informed the US beforehand of what they will be doing. Or the US simply does not care about Pakistan anymore.

The conditions laid down by Mr Lu for such an action are much milder than what is going on in Pakistan currently.
 
.
Well boys and girls - looks like the other shoe has dropped ! Earlier - this was applied to Nigerian situation, and now it is Bangladesh.

Hasina and her lathi bahini cohorts will be banned from the USA forever. No US visas for one party hacks.

I will endorse the name of Hasina Bibi to get banned from getting US visa. This stupid woman is a dictator and a killing machine.

She deserves to be hanged 800times. It is only possible when she is out of power. A fair election will guarantee her fall and the subsequent hanging by rope.

Well boys and girls - looks like the other shoe has dropped ! Earlier - this was applied to Nigerian situation, and now it is Bangladesh.

Hasina and her lathi bahini cohorts will be banned from the USA forever. No US visas for one party hacks.

Khik, khik, khik. @SoulSpokesman, please send your opinion about Hasina out of power. Do you think India will give her shelter?

No doubt, the military will catch and hang that woman for killing their Officers in Pilkhansa. She deserves death 800 times for each killing.
 
Last edited:
.
Spouses and children will also be denied Visa. How about the Grandson of the Nation, Joy Kumar, the son of Hasina. Will he be expelled from America? India might be a better place for him.
 
Last edited:
.
Spouses and children will also be denied Visa. How about the Grandson of the Nation, Joy Kumar, the son of Hasina. Will he be expelled from America? India might be a better place for him.

Shey FaceBook e jei kaidai fotor-fotor kortesey, amar mone hoi, nishana onek agei paisey.

Ma- Beta duijoner obosthai bhalo na....
 
.
If this gets applied to Pakistan, PPP will have a heart attack.

So I am pretty sure they had informed the US beforehand of what they will be doing. Or the US simply does not care about Pakistan anymore.

The conditions laid down by Mr Lu for such an action are much milder than what is going on in Pakistan currently.

Eventually this will get applied to most countries the US wants to control.

Prior to Bangladesh this was applied to Nigeria.

 
.
Its interesting US is punishing BD for not holding free & fair elections yet call recent development in Pak “internal matters”.

Only difference between the 2? BD has a stronger economy and government. Seems US under Biden is hell bent on making sure no Islamic country in the region prospers.

Whether IEA, Pakistan, BD, KSA, UAE or even Turkey. The Biden admin seems hell bent on ruining relations with key allies.
No Pakistani parallel with BD. Pakistan Psrliament has decided which parties would rule. IK party lost.

But, IK started street agitation by mentioning the name of Mujib. But, there is no parallel. Mujib won the majority, but IK lost majority support in the Parliament.

No way, America has no reason to interfere in Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
. .
Shey FaceBook e jei kaidai fotor-fotor kortesey, amar mone hoi, nishana onek agei paisey.

Ma- Beta duijoner obosthai bhalo na....
This Joy Kumar was making parallel between RAB killing innocent people and American gangs killing innocent bystanders. He said BD is doing the same as in America.

Bloody half-educated criminal!! He should be expelled for saying similar things his mother says time to time.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom