below_freezing
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,253
- Reaction score
- 0
??????? C ?
Julia World Wide Web Xinhua reported, with China's growing economic power, the rise of China will become a threat to the United States has recently become a U.S. "foreign policy" of a problem. Experts say the United States, China's rise does not mean war, but some experts commented that, if the future of China surpassed the U.S. as "world boss," the U.S. is not necessarily "the peaceful transfer of power to China." He believes that China is America's "there are challenges."
"Foreign Policy" was previously Professor Joseph Nye of Harvard University published an article review the so-called "China threat" problem. He entitled "China's rise does not mean war," the article said China's military, economic and other aspects of it still harder to overtake the United States, the United States in the first half of this century is likely to continue to maintain superpower status, the Americans so should not produce too much of America's decline and unnecessary fear.
[Transfer from Jagged Community ]404
Specializes in U.S. foreign policy, senior research fellow at Cambridge University before Stephan Haer Po to comment on these articles, his "foreign policy" published an article on the endorsement of the views, but also put forward their own views. Haer Po said, There is no great world parliament "quietly disappear", the United States is no exception. And this along with the rise of Chinese power, by launching different from the West's diplomatic, political and economic values become more realistic. He wrote, "Peace in the 19th century the United States replaced Britain as the world, but this is not the rise of China replaced the United States after the model blueprint" - because the United States and British political model at the time, religion and language are the same, The United States is not the case now.
But Haer Po also said that this does not mean the outbreak of World War III will be. He pointed out that although the military has developed rapidly in China, including a new generation of stealth fighter planes and aircraft carriers should receive the attention the United States, but these are "controllable." He said China's military power put in, battle management and marine and space warfare capabilities are still lagging behind the United States for ten years. He also said that China's rapid economic growth and "mercantilist" trade policy has become difficult Sino-US commercial relations, but not can not go on.
The article points out, the idea that the United States and the idea of peace and cooperation can in fact is due to the rise of the Chinese model "is too simple to imagine for a smooth rise." The article said that although the threat of China's development models are not the Western model, but China has made the envy of some countries and that the Chinese model is superior to the West. The article concludes that China is not America's partners or friends, but the U.S. and Western sense of "survival challenges."
环球网记者谭利娅报道，随着中国经济实力不断增强，中国崛起后是否会成为美国的一个威胁近来成为美国《外交政策》探讨的一个问题。有美国问题专家表示，中国的崛起并不意味着战争，但也有专家发表评论称，如果未来中国超越美国成为世界老大，美国也不一定和平地向中国移交权力。他认为，中国是美国的存在挑战。
《外交政策》此前曾刊登哈佛大学教授约瑟夫·奈的文章评述所谓的中国威胁问题。他在题为《中国崛起并不意味着战争》的文章中表示，中国在军事、经济等方面赶超美国仍任重道远，美国在本世纪上半叶可能将继续保持超级大国的地位，美国人因此不应对美国衰落产生过多的、不必要的恐惧。
[ 转自铁血社区 ?? C ? - ? ]
专门研究美国外交政策的剑桥大学资深研究员斯特凡·哈尔珀日前对上述文章发表评论，他在《外交政策》上的刊文表示赞同作者的观点，同时也提出了自己的见解。哈尔珀称，世界上没有哪个大国会悄然消失，美国也不例外。而这一点随着中国实力不断上升，不断推行异于西方的外交、政治和经济价值观而变得更加真实。他写道，美国在19世纪和平取代英国成为世界第一，但这并非是中国崛起之后取代美国的模式蓝图因为美国与英国当时的政治模式、宗教信仰和语言都是一样的，而中美现在情况却并非如此。
但哈尔珀同时也表示，这并非意味着第三次世界大战将会爆发。他指出，中国虽然军力发展很快，包括新一代隐形战机和航母都应得到美国的重视，但这些都是 可以控制的。他称，中国在军力投放、战场管理和海洋及太空战争能力上仍落后美国十年。此外他还称，中国经济的快速增长与重商主义贸易政策令中美商业关系变得困难，但并不是无法进行下去了。
文章指出，那种认为美中可以和平合作的想法其实是由于把中国的崛起模式过于简单地想象为平稳崛起。文章称，虽然中国发展模式尚不足以威胁西方模式，但中国已令一些国家羡慕并认为中国模式优于西方。文章最后总结称，中国并非美国的伙伴或朋友，而是美国和西方意识的生存挑战。
Julia World Wide Web Xinhua reported, with China's growing economic power, the rise of China will become a threat to the United States has recently become a U.S. "foreign policy" of a problem. Experts say the United States, China's rise does not mean war, but some experts commented that, if the future of China surpassed the U.S. as "world boss," the U.S. is not necessarily "the peaceful transfer of power to China." He believes that China is America's "there are challenges."
"Foreign Policy" was previously Professor Joseph Nye of Harvard University published an article review the so-called "China threat" problem. He entitled "China's rise does not mean war," the article said China's military, economic and other aspects of it still harder to overtake the United States, the United States in the first half of this century is likely to continue to maintain superpower status, the Americans so should not produce too much of America's decline and unnecessary fear.
[Transfer from Jagged Community ]404
Specializes in U.S. foreign policy, senior research fellow at Cambridge University before Stephan Haer Po to comment on these articles, his "foreign policy" published an article on the endorsement of the views, but also put forward their own views. Haer Po said, There is no great world parliament "quietly disappear", the United States is no exception. And this along with the rise of Chinese power, by launching different from the West's diplomatic, political and economic values become more realistic. He wrote, "Peace in the 19th century the United States replaced Britain as the world, but this is not the rise of China replaced the United States after the model blueprint" - because the United States and British political model at the time, religion and language are the same, The United States is not the case now.
But Haer Po also said that this does not mean the outbreak of World War III will be. He pointed out that although the military has developed rapidly in China, including a new generation of stealth fighter planes and aircraft carriers should receive the attention the United States, but these are "controllable." He said China's military power put in, battle management and marine and space warfare capabilities are still lagging behind the United States for ten years. He also said that China's rapid economic growth and "mercantilist" trade policy has become difficult Sino-US commercial relations, but not can not go on.
The article points out, the idea that the United States and the idea of peace and cooperation can in fact is due to the rise of the Chinese model "is too simple to imagine for a smooth rise." The article said that although the threat of China's development models are not the Western model, but China has made the envy of some countries and that the Chinese model is superior to the West. The article concludes that China is not America's partners or friends, but the U.S. and Western sense of "survival challenges."
环球网记者谭利娅报道，随着中国经济实力不断增强，中国崛起后是否会成为美国的一个威胁近来成为美国《外交政策》探讨的一个问题。有美国问题专家表示，中国的崛起并不意味着战争，但也有专家发表评论称，如果未来中国超越美国成为世界老大，美国也不一定和平地向中国移交权力。他认为，中国是美国的存在挑战。
《外交政策》此前曾刊登哈佛大学教授约瑟夫·奈的文章评述所谓的中国威胁问题。他在题为《中国崛起并不意味着战争》的文章中表示，中国在军事、经济等方面赶超美国仍任重道远，美国在本世纪上半叶可能将继续保持超级大国的地位，美国人因此不应对美国衰落产生过多的、不必要的恐惧。
[ 转自铁血社区 ?? C ? - ? ]
专门研究美国外交政策的剑桥大学资深研究员斯特凡·哈尔珀日前对上述文章发表评论，他在《外交政策》上的刊文表示赞同作者的观点，同时也提出了自己的见解。哈尔珀称，世界上没有哪个大国会悄然消失，美国也不例外。而这一点随着中国实力不断上升，不断推行异于西方的外交、政治和经济价值观而变得更加真实。他写道，美国在19世纪和平取代英国成为世界第一，但这并非是中国崛起之后取代美国的模式蓝图因为美国与英国当时的政治模式、宗教信仰和语言都是一样的，而中美现在情况却并非如此。
但哈尔珀同时也表示，这并非意味着第三次世界大战将会爆发。他指出，中国虽然军力发展很快，包括新一代隐形战机和航母都应得到美国的重视，但这些都是 可以控制的。他称，中国在军力投放、战场管理和海洋及太空战争能力上仍落后美国十年。此外他还称，中国经济的快速增长与重商主义贸易政策令中美商业关系变得困难，但并不是无法进行下去了。
文章指出，那种认为美中可以和平合作的想法其实是由于把中国的崛起模式过于简单地想象为平稳崛起。文章称，虽然中国发展模式尚不足以威胁西方模式，但中国已令一些国家羡慕并认为中国模式优于西方。文章最后总结称，中国并非美国的伙伴或朋友，而是美国和西方意识的生存挑战。
