This is latest news , where you discussed it earlier young man?
NATO admits fault in Pakistan attack
CNN|Added on November 26, 2011
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is latest news , where you discussed it earlier young man?
guys i tell u from real credible source that it was a planned attack.the americans were given coordinates of all the post along the Pakistan afg border well in time.where the hell was all that tech once they crossed thr intl border.it was no mistake.it was a sheer act of blunt aggression.
Given the 'delay', perhaps this was not intentional at the 'institutional level', but intentional at the 'local level' - a few 'rogue soldiers' acting out of rage and hate towards perceived 'Pakistani Military duplicity'.First, there is zero evidence for this.
Second, if the USA decides to intentionally attack Pakistan, you'll know it.
Given the 'delay', perhaps this was not intentional at the 'institutional level', but intentional at the 'local level' - a few 'rogue soldiers' acting out of rage and hate towards perceived 'Pakistani Military duplicity'.
There are plenty of articles out there now that highlight the distrust and dislike towards Pakistan among the 'average US soldier' deployed in Afghanistan, and especially those deployed along the Afghan-Pakistan border.
I'm not saying it is impossible for what you've described to happen, but please consider - when a truly disturbed soldier group commits an act of violence outside ROE, it is usually a couple or three individuals, maybe a squad. But to have an entire aviation squadron commanded by high-ranking officers ignore ROE, go rogue and decide one day,
"Let's smoke us some Paksiatnis! Sure it'll create an international incident of epic proportions. It'll destroy relations. Our careers will be over, we may face court martial. But screw it, I want to kill somebody!"
How likely is this for highly trained officers? Not at all, IMO.
Was there gross negligence and a screw-up of epic proportions in November? Of course. But still a FAR cry from "Lets kill us a gaggle of Pakistani border soldiers!"
Hi chogy
forget the deliberate or not delibrate argument for now but dont you think obama is out of order for not apologising immediatly.
Yes. It is ridiculous NOT to apologize profusely.
I'm not sure why the USA doesn't do this. Sometimes, I think it is connected with our current lawyer and litigation driven society. To apologize means to admit fault. Ignore this case for a moment. Let's say in the USA you have a car accident. If you know it was your fault, normal human nature is to tell the cops "I'm SO sorry - I was distracted, I hit the guy" and that is guaranteed to make you lose in any court of law. You have ADMITTED fault.
I know this thing isn't going to court, but this tendency not to admit error is sadly becoming ingrained in our culture.
First, there is zero evidence for this.
Second, if the USA decides to intentionally attack Pakistan, you'll know it. It'll look like Baghdad 1991. It won't be a pair of Apache gunships in the mountains.
The incident was horrendous enough without adding rumors to the mix.
Hi chogy
forget the deliberate or not delibrate argument for now but dont you think obama is out of order for not apologising immediatly.
A show of force via a ISAF aircraft, in theory, should have informed the Pakistani troops that they were ISAF forces.
IF the ISAF forces KNEW that those were Pakistani troops.. why keep attacking?
Moreover, if a return of fire was necessary.. was it also necessary to respond with maximum force? A bomb for a bullet?